Global coverage at a glance: breaking international headlines, geopolitical insights, regional developments, and on‑the‑ground reports from every continent.
Former President Donald Trump, speaking at Fort Bragg on Friday, detailed his involvement in the design of future U.S. Battleships, expressing a preference for aesthetics over stealth technology. This came as part of a broader address to military families, where he likewise discussed increasing military spending and his vision for a revitalized Navy.
Trump’s comments, reported by Yahoo News, revealed a desire to influence the visual aspects of the new vessels. He stated he had “put a little bit more spirit in the hull, give me a little bit more hull — because I aim for that ship to seem gorgeous, you understand.” He contrasted this with what he described as the current focus on stealth, calling the resulting designs “ugly.”
The former president announced in December plans for a new fleet of ships, dubbed the “Trump class,” including the “U.S.S. Defiant.” Naming ships after former presidents is traditionally reserved until after they have left office, a convention Trump appears to be bypassing. He claimed the new battleships would be “100 times more powerful” than those from World War II, though specific details regarding this increased capability were not provided.
Battleship Revival and Design Preferences
Trump’s remarks centered on a desire to resurrect the battleship, referencing iconic vessels like the USS Iowa, USS Alabama and USS Missouri. He acknowledged that officials had told him bringing back older designs was impractical, stating, “They said, ‘Sir, it’d be no good.’ Why do you say that?” Despite this, he expressed his preference for the aesthetic qualities of WWII-era battleships, describing how they moved through the water “like it’s a hot knife through butter.” He also reminisced about viewing scenes from “Victory at Sea,” a documentary series showcasing naval warfare.
The former president also touched on the materials used in shipbuilding, stating a preference for steel over aluminum, despite acknowledging the aluminum industry was “doing exceptionally well.” He emphasized the strength of seven-inch steel hulls, contrasting them with aluminum alternatives. The U.S. Navy currently relies on a mix of steel and aluminum alloys in its shipbuilding programs, balancing strength, weight, and cost considerations.
Fort Bragg Visit and Military Spending
Trump’s appearance at Fort Bragg, one of the largest military bases in the world, also included praise for U.S. Special Forces following a recent operation in Venezuela, as reported by the Associated Press. He stated the raid demonstrated “the full military might” of the U.S. And ensured the nation “is feared” by potential adversaries. The operation involved the removal of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, though details remain limited.
He reiterated his commitment to increasing military spending, stating that the U.S. Is “investing $1 trillion in our armed forces, most we’ve ever spent,” with plans to increase that amount next year. This commitment to bolstering the military is a key component of his ongoing political messaging.
During his speech, Trump also engaged in lighthearted banter with military families, even jokingly considering relocating to Fort Bragg with his wife, Melania. A YouTube video of the full speech is available for viewing.
The announcement of the “Trump class” battleships and the emphasis on aesthetic design represent a departure from traditional naval procurement processes, which prioritize functionality and technological advancements. The cost of building these ships, and the potential impact on existing naval programs, remains to be seen.
As the U.S. Continues to navigate a complex geopolitical landscape, the debate over military spending and the modernization of the armed forces will likely remain a central focus. The future of the “Trump class” battleships, and the extent to which the former president’s design preferences will influence their construction, will be a key area to watch in the coming months.
What are your thoughts on the proposed battleship designs? Share your opinions in the comments below, and be sure to share this article with your network.