Global coverage at a glance: breaking international headlines, geopolitical insights, regional developments, and on‑the‑ground reports from every continent.
As of February 24, 2026, the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine marks a sobering milestone, entering its fifth year. Initially initiated in 2022 as a “special military operation,” this conflict has evolved into Europe’s largest conventional war since World War II. The ongoing struggle is rooted in Russia’s earlier 2014 invasion of Ukraine and has since transitioned from rapid maneuvers to a prolonged, attritional fight characterized by entrenched positions and costly offensives. The war, which has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives, is increasingly a test of endurance for both sides.
Ukraine’s primary strategy hinges on making the conflict increasingly unsustainable for Russia. This involves minimizing territorial losses, inflicting high casualties on Russian forces, and elevating the economic toll of the war to a point where it may compel Moscow to reconsider its demands at the negotiating table. Ukraine has ramped up its long-range strike capabilities, targeting critical Russian energy infrastructure to weaken its opponent’s financial sustainability in the coming years.
In contrast, Russia hopes that sustained military pressure will yield tactical breakthroughs. Still, previous Russian offensives have often failed to meet their objectives, and attempts to exhaust Western political support have largely been unsuccessful. Despite challenges, Ukraine’s resilience has been bolstered by ongoing Western support, which remains robust even amid fluctuations in military engagement.
Current Situation and Challenges
As Ukraine enters 2026, it finds itself facing a complex set of challenges. While the situation is far from hopeless, Kyiv is grappling with electricity rationing in cities and ongoing manpower shortages within its military ranks. After a brief slowdown in Russian offensives during the winter, activity has picked up again as of late January. Ukraine has focused on realigning its relations with Washington, establishing mechanisms to ensure continued Western support, even as its drone advantages have waned.
Military analysts suggest that Russia’s political objectives cannot be achieved through military means alone. Capturing even tiny territories takes considerable time and resources, which have become increasingly costly. Although Russia retains certain advantages on the battlefield, these have not proven decisive, and time increasingly appears to be working against Moscow.
Historical Context
The initial stages of the war in February 2022 saw Ukraine on the brink of disaster as U.S. Intelligence indicated a massing of Russian troops along its borders, suggesting an imminent invasion aimed at installing a pro-Russian regime in Kyiv. However, Ukraine’s government was skeptical of these claims until the very end, and many Western allies misinterpreted the intelligence, underestimating the scale of the impending threat.
Despite early setbacks, including significant casualties, the Ukrainian military, bolstered by volunteers and Western intelligence support, successfully repelled Russian forces in key areas like Kyiv, Kherson, and Kharkiv. However, these victories also led to inflated expectations for a swift Ukrainian victory. In response, Russia initiated partial mobilizations and committed to a prolonged military campaign, particularly evidenced by the grueling battle for Bakhmut from August 2022 to May 2023.
Shift in Battlefield Dynamics
Since 2023, the conflict has taken on a positional and attritional character. The current battlefield dynamic features porous lines with Ukrainian forward positions that are often under threat from Russian infiltration attempts. The area known as the “kill zone,” which lies approximately 10 to 12 miles from the frontline, has become a critical battleground where drone warfare predominates. Here, both sides employ precision strikes and reconnaissance drones to gain an edge, resulting in a deadly stalemate.
Despite the challenges of maintaining troop morale and effective command, Ukraine has shown a capacity for tactical innovation. Operations such as the counteroffensive in Kupiansk during the fall of 2025 highlight how Ukrainian forces can effectively use drones to degrade Russian positions before infantry advances, illustrating a shift towards more systematic approaches in warfare.
The Economic Underpinnings of the War
Both countries are now engaged in campaigns targeting each other’s critical infrastructures, including energy supplies and military production capabilities. Russian strikes on Ukrainian cities have intensified, particularly during the harsh winter months, exacerbating an already strained electric grid. Reports indicate that residents in places like Kyiv have faced rolling blackouts, receiving electricity for only a few hours each day.
In response, Ukraine has increased its own drone production to disrupt Russian energy exports, aiming to create a financially unsustainable situation for Moscow. With Russia’s economy facing stagnation, increasing deficits, and pressure to meet military enlistment quotas amid budget constraints, the sustainability of its war efforts is under scrutiny.
Looking Ahead
The road ahead remains fraught with uncertainty. While Russia has adapted its tactics, its overall combat effectiveness continues to decline, leading to larger losses in manpower. Ukraine, while not without its own challenges, is aiming to stabilize the frontlines and leverage advanced technology to regain its previous advantages, particularly in drone warfare. The current balance of military power suggests that the conflict will continue to evolve, with the potential for sudden changes as both sides adapt to latest realities.
As the situation develops, it will be crucial to monitor how these dynamics unfold and whether Ukraine can maintain its strategic advantages while addressing the internal issues affecting its military capacity. The ongoing support from Western allies will be pivotal in determining the trajectory of the conflict.
For readers interested in following this complex situation, sharing insights and engaging in discussions can help preserve the focus on the human and geopolitical aspects of this ongoing conflict.