world

The arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, has sent shockwaves through the British monarchy and drawn intense scrutiny from European media. News of the arrest, which occurred on Thursday on suspicion of misconduct in public office related to his links with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, dominated front pages across the continent, with many publications framing the event as a pivotal moment for the royal family. The incident occurred on his 66th birthday, adding another layer of complexity to the unfolding situation.

European newspapers largely agreed that the arrest represents a significant escalation of the ongoing scandal surrounding Mountbatten-Windsor and a potential existential threat to the monarchy’s reputation. The coverage reflects a growing demand for accountability and a questioning of the privileges traditionally afforded to the royal family. The arrest follows years of allegations regarding his association with Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019, and the release of millions of pages of documents connected to a U.S. Investigation.

El País, a leading Spanish newspaper, described the arrest as a “momentous watershed” for the Windsor monarchy. In a Friday editorial, the paper suggested that King Charles III’s response to the scandal – which included stripping his brother of royal titles – had been insufficient, and that the monarchy faces a crucial test of its relevance in the 21st century. The paper noted a growing expectation among Britons that royals should be subject to the same legal standards as all citizens.

The sentiment was echoed by El Mundo, also of Spain, which characterized the arrest as a “historic blow” to the British monarchy. The paper highlighted the challenge facing King Charles III in rebuilding public trust in an institution central to the United Kingdom’s identity. The former prince has consistently denied any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein, but the arrest has reignited scrutiny of his past associations.

German publications offered similarly stark assessments. Bild, a German tabloid, declared Mountbatten-Windsor an “outcast” and questioned whether the monarchy could survive the scandal. Süddeutsche Zeitung labeled the arrest “an arrest for the history books.”

(Image: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor pictured soon after leaving a UK police station, looking stunned in the back of a car. Photo: Supplied via RNZ)

Beyond the immediate fallout, several publications focused on the internal dynamics within the royal family. A cartoon in Belgium’s Le Soir depicted the late Queen Elizabeth II observing the arrest from heaven, highlighting the profound shock the event represents for the institution. Le Figaro’s London correspondent, Arnaud de la Grange, suggested that the late Queen would have been deeply troubled by the events, noting that she was particularly protective of her son.

Luigi Ippolito, London correspondent for Italy’s Corriere della Sera, offered a particularly blunt assessment, describing Mountbatten-Windsor as a “black sheep” who had repeatedly jeopardized the monarchy’s reputation. He characterized the former prince as having been “pampered, coddled, and cajoled” throughout his life, ultimately becoming a threat to the entire institution.

The Irish Times emphasized the importance of a thorough investigation into the contents of the Jeffrey Epstein files, noting that the long reach of those files is becoming increasingly evident in damaged reputations and resignations. The paper underscored the need for legal accountability for any criminal acts committed, stating that “the law must grab its course,” a sentiment echoed by King Charles III himself.

Poland’s Gazeta Wyborcza drew a contrast between the handling of the Epstein-related cases in the UK and the US, noting that the UK arrest demonstrated “independent law enforcement doing its job” despite the suspect’s proximity to the head of state. The paper pointed out that, in the US, senior figures implicated in the Epstein saga have largely avoided arrest and continue to hold positions of influence.

The arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor marks a significant moment in the ongoing saga surrounding his association with Jeffrey Epstein. As investigations continue, the British monarchy faces a period of intense scrutiny and a critical test of its ability to adapt to changing public expectations. The coming weeks and months will be crucial in determining the long-term impact of this event on the institution and its future.

What actions will follow the initial arrest remains to be seen, but the demand for accountability from victims and their families is clear. The unfolding situation will undoubtedly continue to generate significant media attention and public debate.

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Friday delivered a significant blow to the Trump administration, ruling that former President Trump did not have the authority to unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs on nearly every country under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The 6-3 decision upholds a lower court ruling that found Mr. Trump’s tariffs were illegal.

The court held that IEEPA, a 1977 law intended to grant the president authority to regulate international transactions during a national emergency, does not authorize the imposition of tariffs. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh dissenting, according to NBC News.

“The Government reads IEEPA to give the President power to unilaterally impose unbounded tariffs and change them at will,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote. “That view would represent a transformative expansion of the President’s authority over tariff policy.” The court noted the lack of historical precedent for using IEEPA to impose tariffs, stating that no president had done so in the law’s half-century of existence.

The legal battle marked the first time the Supreme Court evaluated the legal merits of a second-term policy enacted during the Trump presidency. While the court had previously allowed the administration to temporarily enforce its plans while legal proceedings were underway, this ruling represents the most substantial legal defeat for Mr. Trump thus far in his second term, CBS News reported.

The decision does not preclude the president from imposing tariffs under other trade authorities. Mr. Trump had already utilized other laws to levy tariffs on imports of copper, steel, and aluminum, as well as other products. According to the CNBC, the average effective tariff rate is currently near 17%, the highest since the early 1930s.

The ruling comes as the Supreme Court similarly considers other significant cases involving the Trump administration, including challenges to the president’s authority to fire officials at independent federal agencies and the legality of his plan to end birthright citizenship. Arguments in the birthright citizenship case are scheduled for April.

The decision arrives amid concerns about the US economic outlook. Recent data shows that US economic growth slowed sharply in the fourth quarter of 2025, increasing at an annual rate of 1.4%, according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis. This represents a significant decrease from the 4.4% growth experienced in the third quarter of last year.

Donald Trump is currently in Washington, hosting a working breakfast for several US governors. The National Governors Association (NGA) initially limited invitations to Republican governors, but Mr. Trump claimed the NGA chair, Governor Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma, had “incorrectly stated” his position, and that he had invited all governors except those from Maryland and Colorado, whom he has publicly feuded with.

The Trump administration also announced Friday it will roll back air regulations for power plants, limiting mercury and hazardous air toxics. The move, announced in Kentucky, is intended to boost baseload energy but has drawn criticism from public health groups who argue it will harm vulnerable populations.