Beijing’s economic strength, long a cornerstone of its global influence, is increasingly shadowed by internal vulnerabilities. While China continues to dominate global supply chains and set technological benchmarks, a new assessment suggests its foreign policy is now as much a response to domestic economic weakness as it is driven by external ambitions. This shift presents both risks and opportunities for the European Union, demanding a recalibrated approach to engagement with Beijing.
Slowing economic growth, a rapidly aging population, and a heavily indebted property sector are eroding the foundations of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) legitimacy, which has historically relied on delivering consistent economic prosperity. According to a recent Chaillot Paper published by the Institute for Security Studies (ISS), this erosion is prompting a tightening of party control domestically and a push for economic and technological self-reliance, even if it means further distorting global markets. The pursuit of self-sufficiency is not merely economic; it’s a strategic response to perceived vulnerabilities.
To mitigate the impact of these domestic pressures, China is increasingly employing assertive nationalist rhetoric and a more confrontational diplomatic style. This behavior, the ISS analysis argues, is less about projecting strength and more about diverting attention from internal challenges. China’s influence is now wielded through coercive means – leveraging industrial overcapacity, creating technological dependencies, and establishing strategic chokepoints in critical supply chains – rather than through attraction and soft power.
The EU faces a complex situation. China’s economic fragility is not a cause for complacency, but rather a signal of increased risk and, crucially, potential leverage. The call from analysts is for Europe to accelerate its efforts to “de-risk” its economic relationship with China, bolster its own economic resilience, and engage with Beijing with greater confidence and resolve.
The Looming “Great Reallocation” of Supply Chains
Global supply chains have been under significant strain in recent years, impacted by US-China trade tensions, the COVID-19 pandemic, and broader geopolitical instability. A 2023 working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) documents a notable shift in US participation in global value chains. The paper, authored by Laura Alfaro & Davin Chor, highlights a “looming ‘great reallocation’” in supply chain activity. Direct US sourcing from China has decreased, with countries like Vietnam and Mexico gaining market share as alternative suppliers. This trend suggests a move towards lower-wage locations and “nearshoring” or “friendshoring” strategies.
However, the NBER paper cautions that these shifts are not without potential drawbacks. It remains unclear whether these measures will truly reduce US dependence on supply chains linked to China, and there are already indications that import prices from Vietnam and Mexico are rising. This suggests that simply relocating production does not automatically guarantee lower costs or increased resilience.
China’s Weaponization of Supply Chains
A report from the US-China Security and Exchange Commission (USCC) details how China is actively “weaponizing” its control over key supply chains. The report, titled “Chained to China: Beijing’s Weaponization of Supply Chains,” highlights a surge of low-cost Chinese goods flooding global markets, threatening to undermine competitors and solidify China’s dominance. This influx of goods, the USCC argues, is a deliberate strategy to gain control over increasingly vital supply chains.
This trend is particularly concerning given China’s ambitions in emerging technologies. The country’s supply chain sector is actively integrating high technology with international partners, as evidenced by initiatives outlined in a paper from the China Institute for WTO Studies. This integration, while presenting opportunities for collaboration, also raises concerns about potential vulnerabilities and dependencies.
Policy Implications for the EU
The combination of China’s internal economic challenges and its assertive external behavior necessitates a strategic response from the EU. The ISS Chaillot Paper emphasizes the need for Europe to strengthen its own economic assets and approach Beijing with a more unified and resolute stance. This includes diversifying supply chains, investing in critical technologies, and reducing reliance on Chinese markets where possible.
the EU must be prepared to address China’s use of economic coercion. The creation of strategic chokepoints and the potential for technological lock-in require proactive measures to safeguard European interests and ensure access to essential resources. A coordinated approach, involving both internal policy adjustments and international cooperation, will be crucial to navigating this complex landscape.
Looking ahead, the interplay between China’s economic performance and its geopolitical ambitions will continue to shape the global landscape. The EU’s ability to effectively manage its relationship with Beijing will be a key determinant of its own economic security and strategic autonomy. Continued monitoring of China’s economic indicators, coupled with a proactive and coordinated policy response, will be essential in the coming years.
What are your thoughts on the EU’s approach to China? Share your perspectives in the comments below.
