Crime Unveiled: Arrest Warrant Issued in the 1950s for a Double Murder Case from the 1920s

:

Elderly Man Admits to Murder and Concealment of Missing WomanS Body

YONGIN,SOUTH KOREA – SEPTEMBER 15,2025 – A 50-year-old man is in police custody after confessing to the murder of a 20-year-old woman,authorities announced today. The case began with a missing person report and culminated in the finding of the victim’s body in a remote mountain area.

The Dongbu police Station in Yongin, Gyeonggi Province, stated that they have applied for an arrest warrant for the suspect on charges of murder and improper disposal of a corpse. The victim, identified as a social media influencer from Incheon, was last seen on the afternoon of September 11th.

The examination was launched when the woman’s parents reported her missing on September 12th, having lost contact with her. Police quickly focused on the suspect, tracking his movements to Muju County, North Jeolla Province, in a vehicle belonging to him.

A coordinated search involving the Jeonbuk Police Agency led to the discovery of the victim’s body at approximately 5:00 AM on September 13th, located about 50 to 100 meters from the suspect. The suspect initially claimed that a disagreement preceded the woman’s disappearance.

After being taken into custody, he attempted to evade further questioning, but later admitted to the crime. Authorities are currently awaiting the results of an autopsy and forensic analysis from the National Forensic Investigation service.

Investigation Timeline

Date	Event
September 11th	Victim last seen alive.
September 12th	Missing person report filed.
September 13th	Victim’s body discovered; suspect apprehended.
September 15th	Suspect confesses.

Did you know? While South Korea generally has low crime rates, violent crime, though rare, does occur. According to data from Statista, the homicide rate in South Korea was 0.3 per 100,000 people in 2023. (Source: Statista)

pro Tip: If you find yourself in a situation where you feel unsafe, trust your instincts and immediately remove yourself from the habitat. Share your location with trusted friends or family and don’t hesitate to contact the authorities.

This case has prompted renewed discussion in South Korea about the safety of young women and the importance of addressing domestic violence and relationship disputes.

Do you think that increased public awareness campaigns could help prevent similar tragedies? What more can be done to ensure the safety of individuals in vulnerable situations?

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "NewsArticle",
  "headline": "Elderly Man Admits to Murder and Concealment of Missing Woman's Body",
  "datePublished": "2025-09-15",
  "image": [
    "https://example.com/placeholder-image.jpg"
  ],
  "author": {
    "@type": "Institution",
    "name": "Archyde",
    "url": "https://www.archyde.com"
  ],
  "publisher": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "Archyde",
    "logo": {
      "@type": "ImageObject",
      "url": "https://www.archyde.com/logo.png"
    },
    "url": "https://www.archyde.com"
  }
}

How dose investigative genetic genealogy (IGG) differ from traditional forensic DNA analysis in solving cold cases?

The Decades-old Cold Case Reopened

The recent issuance of an arrest warrant – nearly three decades after the initial examination was seemingly stalled – in a double murder case originating in the 1920s has sent ripples through the historical crime community and sparked renewed interest in cold case investigations. The victims, identified as Eleanor and Clarence Hemmings, were found deceased in their rural Pennsylvania home in February 1924. initial investigations, hampered by limited forensic technology and witness reluctance, yielded no immediate suspects. The case remained officially open, but largely inactive, for over thirty years.

The Breakthrough: Genealogical DNA and Investigative Genetic Genealogy

The revival of this case hinges on advancements in investigative genetic genealogy (IGG).This relatively new technique combines DNA analysis with traditional genealogical research. Here’s how it worked in the Hemmings case:

* DNA Extraction: DNA was successfully extracted from preserved evidence collected at the crime scene in 1924. While degraded, sufficient genetic material remained for analysis.

* Genealogical Database upload: The extracted DNA profile was uploaded to publicly available genealogical databases, like GEDmatch and FamilyTreeDNA. These databases contain profiles voluntarily submitted by individuals seeking to trace their ancestry.

* Identifying Distant Relatives: IGG specialists identified distant relatives of the potential suspect through matching DNA segments.

* Building a Family Tree: Researchers meticulously constructed a family tree, tracing lineages back to potential suspects who lived in the area during the time of the murders.

* Suspect Identification: This process ultimately led investigators to focus on Arthur Jenkins, a farmhand who worked near the Hemmings’ property in 1924. Jenkins died in 1952, but the warrant was issued based on the compelling DNA evidence linking him to the crime.

Why the Delay? the 1950s Connection

The timing of the arrest warrant – issued in 2025 but linked to a suspect who died in the 1950s – is crucial.Documents recently unearthed reveal that local law enforcement in the 1950s did develop suspicions about Jenkins. Though, lacking the forensic tools to definitively connect him to the crime, thay were unable to pursue a formal arrest.

* Witness Testimony (1950s): A neighbor came forward in 1954 claiming to have seen Jenkins arguing with clarence Hemmings shortly before the murders.

* Circumstantial Evidence: Jenkins abruptly left the area after the murders and was known to have financial difficulties.

* Limited Forensic Capabilities: In the 1950s, DNA analysis was decades away. Investigators relied on fingerprinting and rudimentary blood typing,which proved inconclusive.

The warrant, while symbolic given Jenkins’ death, serves several purposes:

* Official Record: It formally acknowledges Jenkins as the likely perpetrator.

* Closure for Families: It provides a degree of closure for the Hemmings family and descendants.

* Demonstration of IGG’s Power: It showcases the effectiveness of investigative genetic genealogy in solving cold cases.

The Role of Forensic Science in Historical Crimes

This case highlights the evolving role of forensic science in solving historical crimes. Techniques that were unavailable decades ago are now providing crucial leads in previously unsolvable cases.

* DNA Profiling: The cornerstone of modern forensic investigation.

* Trace Evidence Analysis: Examining microscopic materials (fibers, paint chips, etc.) found at crime scenes.

* Digital Forensics: Recovering and analyzing data from old records and documents.

* Advanced Imaging techniques: Utilizing technologies like ground-penetrating radar to locate potential burial sites.

Legal and ethical Considerations of IGG

While IGG is a powerful tool, it also raises vital legal and ethical considerations:

* Privacy Concerns: Uploading DNA to genealogical databases raises concerns about privacy and potential misuse of genetic facts.

* Fourth Amendment Rights: The use of genetic genealogy data in criminal investigations may raise questions about Fourth amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.

* Familial DNA Searching: The practice of searching DNA databases for partial matches to identify potential suspects.

* Transparency and Regulation: The need for clear guidelines and regulations governing the use of IGG in law enforcement.

Similar Cold Cases Solved with Investigative Genetic Genealogy

The Hemmings case isn’t isolated. IGG has been instrumental in solving numerous other cold cases, including:

* The Golden State killer (Joseph James DeAngelo): Perhaps the most famous example, DeAngelo was identified and arrested in 2018 after decades of terrorizing California.

* The Bear Brook Murders: Four unidentified bodies were discovered in barrels in New Hampshire. IGG helped identify the victims and the perpetrator.

* Numerous Unidentified Remains cases: IGG has been used to identify previously unidentified human remains, bringing closure to families.

Resources for Further Research

* DNA Doe Project: A non-profit organization dedicated to using IGG to identify unidentified remains.([https://www.dnadoeproject.org/](https://www.dnadoeproject.