Home » Economy » Do 4 year cycles still exist for bitcoin? Specialists give their opinion

Do 4 year cycles still exist for bitcoin? Specialists give their opinion

Bitcoin’s Four-Year Cycle Under Threat: Wall Street’s Influence Grows

Breaking News: The long-held belief in Bitcoin’s predictable four-year cycles – driven by the “halving” event – is facing serious scrutiny. A surge of institutional investment, coupled with evolving regulations, is leading experts to question whether the traditional patterns of boom and bust are a thing of the past. This is a pivotal moment for the cryptocurrency, potentially marking a shift from a scarcity-driven market to one more influenced by the rhythms of Wall Street. This article is optimized for Google News and SEO to deliver the latest updates instantly.

The Halving’s Historical Role & Why It Might Be Changing

For years, Bitcoin investors have relied on the halving – a programmed reduction in the reward for mining new blocks – as a key indicator of market cycles. Historically, halvings (like the one in 2024) have been followed by roughly four-year periods of bullish growth, culminating in a bear market. The theory suggests that reduced supply, coupled with consistent or increasing demand, drives up prices. However, the game is changing. The influx of capital from traditional financial institutions is introducing new dynamics, potentially overshadowing the halving’s influence.

Institutional Capital: A New Force in the Bitcoin Market

Guillermo Fernandes, a Venezuelan cryptocurrency investor and consultant, believes the arrival of institutional money is fundamentally altering Bitcoin’s behavior. “The influx of capital from Wall Street… implies that this market will be more prone to the behaviors and incentives of other public markets,” he explained to CriptoNoticias. Fernandes predicts that large institutions will focus on profit-taking and rebalancing their portfolios on a quarterly basis, leading to shorter, less predictable cycles – closer to four quarters than four years.

This perspective is echoed by Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise, who points to favorable regulations in the United States – including the creation of a national digital assets reserve and the Ley Genius – as catalysts for increased institutional participation. The launch of Bitcoin ETFs is seen as a particularly significant development, opening the door for massive investment from traditional players.

Is Supply Reduction Still Relevant?

Economist Daniel Arráez, specializing in Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, argues that the diminishing impact of the halving is also tied to the sheer size of the Bitcoin market. While the supply reduction is real, Arráez contends that the amount of Bitcoin generated is no longer significant enough to cause a substantial alteration in production costs. “The gap in the reduction of supply is no longer so wide,” he states, suggesting a potential flattening of the price curve and increased stability.

Not Everyone Agrees: The Risk-On Asset Debate

Despite the growing consensus around institutional influence, some experts remain skeptical. Henrik Zeberg, Chief Economist at SwissBlock, cautions that Bitcoin is not the “safe haven” many believe it to be. He highlights its correlation with stock markets, particularly the Nasdaq, suggesting it could be vulnerable to a significant downturn during periods of economic turbulence. Willy Woo, also of SwissBlock, anticipates a major price drop after current highs, linking it to broader macroeconomic conditions.

A Potential “Super Cycle” or a New Normal?

Manuel Terrones Godoy, a Bitcoin and cryptocurrency advocate, offers a more optimistic outlook, suggesting a “super bull cycle” is beginning. He attributes this potential surge to the ease of access provided by Bitcoin ETFs, removing previous obstacles to widespread adoption. “Bitcoin never had a massive adoption cycle, it had a gradual adoption cycle, very slow in fact,” Godoy notes.

The debate now centers on whether institutional demand can consistently overcome the traditional halving rhythm and the influence of the global macroeconomy. The future of Bitcoin isn’t solely tied to its programmed scarcity anymore; it’s increasingly shaped by the decisions and capital of large financial institutions. Staying informed about these evolving dynamics is crucial for anyone involved in the cryptocurrency space. For more in-depth analysis and breaking news on Bitcoin and the broader digital asset market, continue exploring the resources available at Archyde.com.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.