Emerald Fennell’s adaptation of Emily Brontë’s classic novel, Wuthering Heights, is proving to be a divisive one. While lauded for its striking visuals and willingness to lean into the darker, more sensual elements of the story, some critics and viewers feel the film ultimately pulls back from fully embracing its own provocative premise. The film, starring Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi, isn’t a faithful retelling, but rather a reimagining that prioritizes the raw, consuming lust at the heart of Cathy and Heathcliff’s doomed relationship. This approach, while initially compelling, leaves some wondering if Fennell should have committed even further to the film’s own audacious vision.
The core of the debate lies in Fennell’s willingness to deviate from Brontë’s original narrative. The novel, a staple of high school curricula since its 1847 publication, is renowned for its complex characters and exploration of social class and passionate, yet ultimately destructive, love. Fennell’s version, but, strips away much of the subtlety, presenting a Cathy (Robbie) as a calculating and spiteful woman and a Heathcliff (Elordi) as a force of untamed, animalistic desire. This shift in characterization, coupled with explicit depictions of sexual tension, has sparked conversation about the film’s intent, and execution.
One of the most discussed aspects of the film is its frank portrayal of the physical relationship between Cathy and Heathcliff. Fennell doesn’t shy away from depicting their intense attraction, culminating in repeated, graphic encounters. As reported by several reviews, a particularly controversial scene depicts Heathcliff interrupting Cathy during a private moment, a moment that pushes the boundaries of what’s typically seen on screen. This willingness to explore the physicality of their connection is a deliberate choice, transforming “Wuthering Heights” from a story of frustrated longing into one focused on the dangers and allure of unrestrained lust.
However, it’s in the film’s refusal to fully embrace the darker implications of this shift that some critics identify fault. Late in the narrative, Heathcliff proposes a chilling solution to their predicament: murder Edgar Linton (Shazad Latif), Cathy’s husband, so they can inherit his fortune. While Cathy ultimately rejects this plan, the suggestion itself is a significant departure from Brontë’s original text. The film flirts with the idea of transforming into a full-blown crime drama, but ultimately retreats, leaving viewers with a sense of unfulfilled potential.
This hesitation to fully commit to a more extreme vision is what frustrates some observers. Fennell establishes a heightened, almost surreal aesthetic, reminiscent of the work of director Ken Russell, known for his visually arresting and often sexually charged films. Given this stylistic foundation, the argument is made that the film could have leaned further into a horror-tinged narrative. What if, as the film suggests, the consequences of their actions were far more gruesome? What if Nelly (Hong Chau) or Isabella (Alison Oliver) discovered their secret and faced dire repercussions? The line between a gothic romance and a chilling tale of murder and madness, the argument goes, is surprisingly thin, and Fennell had the opportunity to cross it.
The film’s aesthetic choices, while visually striking, also contribute to this sense of unrealized potential. The production design, with its deliberate use of symbolic imagery – flesh-colored walls, phallic shapes, and vaginal motifs – hints at a deeper, more subversive exploration of desire and power. However, by ultimately settling for a more conventional tragic ending, the film feels somewhat restrained, failing to fully capitalize on the provocative groundwork it lays. As one critic noted, the film highlights that Cathy and Heathcliff are simply “terrible people” whose actions lead to misery, rather than offering a truly shocking or unsettling conclusion.
Fennell’s Wuthering Heights is a bold and visually arresting adaptation that sparks conversation. While it may not satisfy purists of the original novel, its willingness to explore the darker, more sensual aspects of the story is commendable. However, the film’s reluctance to fully embrace its own provocative premise leaves a lingering sense of what could have been. The film’s success, as measured by its initial reception and ongoing discussion, suggests an audience appetite for daring reinterpretations of classic literature.
As Warner Bros. Discovery continues to navigate its streaming strategy, including content on HBO Max, films like Wuthering Heights demonstrate a willingness to take risks with established properties. The studio’s recent agreement with Netflix, as reported by the Associated Press, signals a continued focus on delivering compelling content to a broad audience. Whether this will lead to more similarly audacious adaptations remains to be seen.
What did you think of Emerald Fennell’s take on Wuthering Heights? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
