Escalating geopolitical tensions following recent events in Iran are significantly disrupting oil and gas dealmaking in the United States, leaving the market in a state of uncertainty. Surging energy prices, coupled with the inherent risks associated with international conflict, have created a challenging environment for calculating accurate transaction valuations, effectively stalling many potential deals.
The current climate is characterized by a reluctance among investors to commit to large-scale transactions in the energy sector. The volatility in global oil and gas markets, directly linked to the situation in Iran, makes it exceedingly difficult to assess the long-term financial viability of potential acquisitions and investments. This paralysis extends across various segments, from upstream exploration and production to midstream infrastructure and downstream refining.
Impact on Transaction Valuations
The core issue lies in the difficulty of establishing a reliable baseline for valuation. Traditionally, energy asset valuations are heavily influenced by projected future cash flows, which are, in turn, dependent on stable and predictable commodity prices. The Iran conflict has introduced a significant degree of unpredictability, making it nearly impossible to forecast future prices with any degree of confidence. According to Seguro Energy, fair market transaction valuations require “sophisticated, industry-standard modeling tools and accepted methodologies,” which are proving inadequate in the face of such rapid and unpredictable shifts.
This valuation challenge isn’t limited to direct oil and gas assets. Companies involved in natural gas power are also feeling the effects. A recent report from Enverus indicated that U.S. Natural gas power sector M&A valuations have doubled since 2024, driven by demand from data centers and rising capital costs, but this growth is now threatened by the increased geopolitical risk. The report highlights that buyers were previously paying record prices for high-efficiency generation assets, a trend that is now in jeopardy.
Regional Hubs and Market Data
Data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) shows that wholesale electricity and natural gas market data are being closely monitored, but even this detailed information is struggling to provide clarity amidst the turmoil. The EIA, which republishes data collected by the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), tracks trading activity at major hubs across North America, including hubs in New England (Mass Hub), the PJM region (PJM West), the Midwest (Indiana Hub), Texas (ERCOT North), and California (NP-15). As of March 2026, the EIA has historical data for natural gas dating back to March 2014, and electricity data availability varies by hub, with some hubs having data from as early as 2001. However, this historical data offers limited predictive power in the current environment.
The Role of Financial Assessments
Financial assessments and valuations are crucial for navigating these uncertain times. Moss Adams emphasizes that valuations are “fundamental to informing your decision-making process, providing accurate financial assessments of your energy business.” These assessments can help companies determine fair market value and navigate complex financial reporting requirements, particularly in light of evolving accounting standards. S&P Global also provides tools to track deal activity, pricing, and M&A spending trends, offering some insight into the shifting landscape, but even these resources are hampered by the current instability.
The situation is further complicated by the increasing demand for data center infrastructure, which relies heavily on reliable and affordable energy sources. This demand is driving up the value of certain energy assets, but the geopolitical risks are simultaneously creating a chilling effect on overall investment.
What to Watch Next
The immediate future of US oil and gas dealmaking hinges on the de-escalation of tensions in Iran and the stabilization of global energy prices. Investors will be closely watching for any signs of a diplomatic resolution or a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape. Until then, a period of prolonged uncertainty and reduced transaction activity is likely to persist. Continued monitoring of market data from the EIA and independent valuations from firms like S&P Global will be essential for understanding the evolving dynamics of the energy market.
What are your thoughts on the impact of the Iran conflict on the energy sector? Share your insights in the comments below and help us continue to provide comprehensive coverage of this critical issue.
