Establishment of a CRISPR/Cas12a/13a-driven dual-detection platform for rapid diagnosis of swine influenza virus and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection | Virology Journal

Baudon E, Peyre M, Peiris M, Cowling BJ. Epidemiological features of influenza circulation in swine populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0179044. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179044.

Google Scholar

Yk C, Sm G, Hs J. Retrospective analysis of etiologic agents associated with respiratory diseases in pigs. Can Vet J; 2003;44:735-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14524628/

Shope RE. Swine influenza: i. experimental transmission and pathology. J Exp Med. 1931;54:349–59. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.54.3.349.

Google Scholar

Lunney JK, Fang Y, Ladinig A, et al. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV): pathogenesis and interaction with the immune system. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2016;4:129–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-111025.

Google Scholar

Dobrescu I, Levast B, Lai K, Delgado-Ortega M, Walker S, Banman S, et al. In vitro and ex vivo analyses of co-infections with swine influenza and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses. Vet Microbiol. 2014;169:18–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.11.037.

Google Scholar

Van Reeth K, Labarque G, Nauwynck H, Pensaert M. Differential production of proinflammatory cytokines in the pig lung during different respiratory virus infections: correlations with pathogenicity. Res Vet Sci. 1999;67:47–52. https://doi.org/10.1053/rvsc.1998.0277.

Google Scholar

Zhang H, Luo Q, He Y, Zheng Y, Sha H, Li G, et al. Research progress on the development of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome vaccines. Vet Sci. 2023;10:491. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10080491.

Google Scholar

Tian K, Yu X, Zhao T, Feng Y, Cao Z, Wang C, et al. Emergence of fatal PRRSV variants: unparalleled outbreaks of atypical PRRS in China and molecular dissection of the unique hallmark. PLoS One. 2007;2:e526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000526.

Google Scholar

Lunney JK, Fang Y, Ladinig A, Chen N, Li Y, Rowland B, et al. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV): pathogenesis and interaction with the immune system. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2016;4:129–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-111025.

Google Scholar

Janke BH. Influenza A virus infections in swine: pathogenesis and diagnosis. Vet Pathol. 2014;51:410–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985813513043.

Google Scholar

Li C, Xu H, Li J, Gong B, Guo Z, Xiang L, et al. Genetic evolution and alterations in pathogenicity of highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Virulence. 2025;16:2504124. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2025.2504124.

Google Scholar

Desrosiers R. Transmission of swine pathogens: different means, different needs. Anim Health Res Rev. 2011;12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252310000204.

Google Scholar

Zhao D, Yang B, Yuan X, Shen C, Zhang D, Shi X, et al. Advanced research in Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus co-infection with other pathogens in swine. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:699561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.699561.

Google Scholar

Van Reeth K, Nauwynck H, Pensaert M. Dual infections of feeder pigs with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus followed by porcine respiratory coronavirus or swine influenza virus: a clinical and virological study. Vet Microbiol. 1996;48:325–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(95)00145-x.

Google Scholar

Choi YK, Goyal SM, Joo HS. Retrospective analysis of etiologic agents associated with respiratory diseases in pigs. Can Vet J. 2003;44:735–7.

Google Scholar

Pol JMA, Van Leengoed LAMG, Stockhofe N, Kok G, Wensvoort G. Dual infections of PRRSV/influenza or PRRSV/Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in the respiratory tract. Vet Microbiol. 1997;55:259–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1135(96)01323-5.

Google Scholar

Yang Q, Xi J, Chen X, Hu S, Chen N, Qiao S, Wan S, Bao D. The development of a sensitive droplet digital PCR for quantitative detection of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;104:1223–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.115.

Google Scholar

Zhang M, Xie Z, Xie L, Deng X, Xie Z, Luo S, Liu J, Pang Y, Khan MI. Simultaneous detection of eight swine reproductive and respiratory pathogens using a novel GeXP analyser-based multiplex PCR assay. J Virol Methods. 2015;224:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.08.001.

Google Scholar

Bakre AA, Jones LP, Bennett HK, Bobbitt DE, Tripp RA. Detection of swine influenza virus in nasal specimens by reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP). J Virol Methods. 2021;288:114015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114015.

Google Scholar

Venteo A, Rebollo B, Sarraseca J, Rodriguez MJ, Sanz A. A novel double recognition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on the nucleocapsid protein for early detection of European porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection. J Virol Methods. 2012;181(1):109–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.01.024.

Google Scholar

Yu JE, Ouh IO, Kang H, Lee HY, Cheong KM, Cho IS, Cha SH. An enhanced immunochromatographic strip test using colloidal gold nanoparticle-labeled dual-type N proteins for detection of antibodies to PRRS virus. J Vet Sci. 2018;19(4):519–27. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2018.19.4.519.

Google Scholar

Figueiredo D, Cascalheira A, Goncalves J. Rapid, multiplex detection of SARS-CoV-2 using isothermal amplification coupled with CRISPR-Cas12a. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):849. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27133-7.

Google Scholar

Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Lee JW, Essletzbichler P, Dy AJ, Joung J, Verdine V, Donghia N, Daringer NM, Freije CA, Myhrvold C, Bhattacharyya RP, Livny J, Regev A, Koonin EV, Hung DT, Sabeti PC, Collins JJ, Zhang F. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science. 2017;356(6336):438–42. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9321.

Google Scholar

Mori Y, Notomi T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a rapid, accurate, and cost-effective diagnostic method for infectious diseases. J Infect Chemother. 2009;15(2):62–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-009-0669-9.

Google Scholar

Li H, Leng H, Tang S, Su C, Xu Y, Wang Y, et al. Prevalence, genetics and evolutionary properties of Eurasian avian-like H1N1 swine influenza viruses in Liaoning. Viruses. 2022;14:643. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14030643.

Google Scholar

Ren Z, Kang P, Zhang P, Sun C, Chen J, Xiang H, et al. Development of SYBR green I-based real-time qPCR differential diagnosis assays for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus typing in Guangdong province. Front Vet Sci. 2025;12:1495128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1495128.

Google Scholar

Tao C, Zhu X, Huang Y, Yuan W, Wang Z, Zhu H, et al. Development of a multiplex RT–qPCR method for the identification and lineage typing of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:13203. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252313203.

Google Scholar

Hoffmann E, Stech J, Guan Y, Webster RG, Perez DR. Universal primer set for the full-length amplification of all influenza A viruses. Arch Virol. 2001;146(12):2275–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007050170002.

Google Scholar

Liu J, Xu Y, Lin Z, Fan J, Dai A, Deng X, et al. Epidemiology investigation of PRRSV discharged by faecal and genetic variation of orf5. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13894.

Google Scholar

Li Y, Robertson I. The epidemiology of swine influenza. Anim Dis. 2021;1:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44149-021-00024-6.

Google Scholar

Lim S, Perez AM, Kanankege KST. Modeling the seasonal variation of windborne transmission of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus between swine farms. Viruses. 2023;15:1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15081765.

Google Scholar

Van Reeth K, Nauwynck H, Pensaert M. Clinical effects of experimental dual infections with Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus followed by swine influenza virus in conventional and colostrum-deprived pigs. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B. 2001;48:283–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0450.2001.00438.x.

Google Scholar

Ito S, Bosch J, Martínez-Avilés M, Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM. The evolution of African Swine Fever in China: a global threat? Front Vet Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.828498.

Google Scholar

Cong Y, Sun Y, Deng X, Yu H, Lian X, Cong Y. A SYBR green-based real-time RT-PCR assay to differentiate the H1N1 influenza virus lineages. J Virol Methods. 2022;300:114387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114387.

Google Scholar

Gerber PF, O’Neill K, Owolodun O, Wang C, Harmon K, Zhang J, et al. Comparison of commercial Real-Time reverse Transcription-PCR assays for Reliable, Early, and rapid detection of heterologous strains of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in experimentally infected or noninfected boars by use of different sample types. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:547–56. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02685-12.

Google Scholar

Elnagar A, Blome S, Beer M, Hoffmann B. Point-of-care testing for sensitive detection of the African swine fever virus genome. Viruses. 2022;14:2827. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14122827.

Google Scholar

Lunney JK, Fang Y, Ladinig A, Chen N, Li Y, Rowland B, Renukaradhya GJ. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV): pathogenesis and interaction with the immune system. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2016;4:129–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-111025.

Google Scholar

Prosper A, Solianas L, Canelian E, Bains L, Gabbing V, Torggian C, et al. Influence A influences: viral circulation in the Emilia-Romananas (Northern Italy) beween 2017 and 2022. Animals (Basel). 2022;12(12):1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121593.

Google Scholar

What advantages dose the CRISPR-based dual‑detection platform provide over traditional PCR for diagnosing SIV and PRRSV in swine?

Rapid Swine Disease diagnosis: A New CRISPR-Based Platform

The swift and accurate diagnosis of infectious diseases in livestock is crucial for maintaining animal health, preventing economic losses, and safeguarding public health. Swine influenza virus (SIV) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) pose significant threats to the swine industry globally. Traditional diagnostic methods, while reliable, can be time-consuming and require specialized laboratory infrastructure. Recent advancements in molecular diagnostics, particularly leveraging the power of CRISPR technology, are revolutionizing disease detection. A study published in virology Journal details the establishment of a novel CRISPR/Cas12a/13a-driven dual-detection platform for the rapid diagnosis of both SIV and PRRSV infections.

Understanding the CRISPR Revolution

Before diving into the specifics of the platform, it’s important to understand the core technology. CRISPR, which stands for “Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats,” is a revolutionary gene-editing tool adapted for diagnostic purposes.As explained by sources like Zhihu, CRISPR isn’t just about gene editing; it’s fundamentally a DNA sequence.

* How it Works: The CRISPR system utilizes Cas enzymes (like Cas12a and Cas13a) guided by RNA molecules to specifically target and bind to DNA or RNA sequences of interest – in this case, viral genetic material.

* Cas12a & Cas13a – key Players: Cas12a targets DNA, while Cas13a targets RNA. This dual capability is key to the platform’s effectiveness. When the Cas enzyme finds its target, it’s activated and begins to cleave nearby nucleic acids, generating a detectable signal.

The Dual-Detection Platform: A Detailed Look

The Virology Journal study outlines a platform designed to simultaneously detect SIV and PRRSV, considerably reducing diagnostic turnaround time. Here’s a breakdown of the key components and how they work together:

1. Sample planning: the process begins with extracting nucleic acids (RNA for SIV and PRRSV) from clinical samples like nasal swabs or lung tissue.Efficient nucleic acid extraction is vital for accurate results.
2. CRISPR-Cas Reaction: The extracted nucleic acids are then subjected to a CRISPR-Cas reaction. This involves:

* Target-Specific Guide RNAs: Researchers designed guide RNAs specifically targeting unique sequences within the SIV and PRRSV genomes.

* Cas12a for SIV & Cas13a for PRRSV: Cas12a is employed for SIV detection (DNA target) and Cas13a for PRRSV detection (RNA target).

* Reporter Molecules: Reporter molecules are added to the reaction mixture.Upon Cas enzyme activation, these molecules are cleaved, generating a fluorescent signal.

3. Signal Detection: A fluorescence reader detects the cleaved reporter molecules, indicating the presence of either SIV, PRRSV, or both. The intensity of the signal correlates with the viral load.
4. Multiplexing Capability: The platform’s design allows for simultaneous detection of both viruses in a single reaction, streamlining the diagnostic process.

Benefits of the CRISPR-Based Platform

This new diagnostic approach offers several advantages over traditional methods like PCR and virus isolation:

* Rapid Turnaround Time: Results can be obtained within an hour, compared to several hours or even days for conventional techniques.this speed is critical for timely intervention and disease control.

* High Sensitivity & Specificity: The CRISPR/Cas system exhibits exceptional sensitivity and specificity, minimizing false-positive and false-negative results.

* Cost-Effectiveness: The platform utilizes relatively inexpensive reagents and equipment, making it accessible to a wider range of diagnostic laboratories.

* Portability: The simplicity of the setup allows for potential growth of point-of-care diagnostic devices,enabling on-site testing in farms and veterinary clinics.

* Dual Detection: Simultaneously identifying both SIV and PRRSV is a significant advantage, as co-infection is common and can complicate disease management.

Real-World Applications & Case Studies

while widespread implementation is still evolving, early applications of CRISPR-based diagnostics in veterinary medicine are promising. Several veterinary diagnostic companies are now incorporating CRISPR technology into their product lines.

* Field Trials: Initial field trials