Brussels – The European Parliament has moved to restrict the use of artificial intelligence on its internal networks, disabling AI features on the work devices of lawmakers and staff amid growing concerns about cybersecurity and data protection. The move, detailed in an internal email seen by POLITICO, reflects a broader trend of heightened scrutiny towards AI technologies and their potential vulnerabilities.
The Parliament’s IT department determined it could not fully guarantee the security of data processed by these AI tools, prompting the immediate suspension of “built-in artificial intelligence features” on corporate tablets. The core issue, according to the email, is that some of these features rely on cloud services to perform tasks that could otherwise be handled locally on the device, potentially transmitting sensitive data off-site. This decision underscores the delicate balance between embracing technological advancements and safeguarding sensitive institutional information.
Specifically, the disabled features include writing and summarizing assistants, enhanced virtual assistants and webpage summaries available on both tablets and phones, according to an EU official who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Apps, email, calendar, and standard document tools remain unaffected by the change. The Parliament’s e-MEP tech support desk explained in the internal communication that the full extent of data sharing with service providers is still under assessment as these features evolve and grow more widespread. Until a clearer understanding is established, disabling the features is considered the safest course of action.
This isn’t the first instance of the European Union taking a cautious approach to technology. In 2023, the Parliament banned TikTok on staff devices, citing security concerns, and previously urged a shift away from Microsoft software in favor of European alternatives, as reported by POLITICO. The latest action builds on this pattern of prioritizing data security and digital sovereignty.
The decision comes as the EU continues to strengthen its data security policies, particularly in response to concerns surrounding foreign technology vendors. The Parliament’s move similarly extends to advising lawmakers to exercise caution when using AI features on their personal devices, specifically warning against sharing work emails or internal documents with AI tools that scan content and urging caution with third-party AI applications.
Data Security Concerns Drive Policy Shift
The core concern driving the Parliament’s decision is the potential for data leakage. The internal email highlighted that the AI features in question transmit data to cloud services for processing, raising questions about data privacy, and control. This is particularly sensitive given the nature of the information handled by Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) and their staff. The Parliament’s action reflects a growing awareness of the risks associated with relying on external cloud services for processing sensitive data.
The timing of this decision is also significant. The EU is actively working on comprehensive AI regulations, the EU AI Act, which aims to establish a legal framework for the development and deployment of AI technologies. This internal policy change demonstrates the Parliament’s commitment to upholding data protection principles while these broader regulations are being finalized.
Broader Implications for AI Adoption
The European Parliament’s decision to disable AI features could have wider implications for the adoption of AI technologies within government institutions and organizations handling sensitive data. It serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the importance of thoroughly assessing the security and privacy implications of AI tools before deploying them.
While the Parliament’s move may temporarily limit access to certain AI-powered productivity tools, it also underscores the need for greater transparency and control over data processing. The institution’s statement emphasizes that it “constantly monitor[s] cybersecurity threats and quickly deploys the necessary measures to prevent them,” signaling a proactive approach to digital security.
The Parliament’s press service stated it wouldn’t comment on specific security matters due to their sensitive nature, but confirmed its ongoing commitment to cybersecurity. The situation is evolving, and the Parliament will likely reassess its policy as AI technologies mature and data security concerns are addressed.
What comes next will depend on the ongoing assessment of data security risks and the development of clearer guidelines for the use of AI tools. The EU’s broader regulatory framework for AI will also play a crucial role in shaping the future of AI adoption within the Parliament and across the European Union.
What are your thoughts on the EU Parliament’s decision? Share your comments below and let us understand how you think this will impact the future of AI in government.
