Tariffs too Drive Inflation Higher, Fed‘s Powell Signals Hawkish Stance, Rate Cuts Unlikely
Table of Contents
- 1. Tariffs too Drive Inflation Higher, Fed’s Powell Signals Hawkish Stance, Rate Cuts Unlikely
- 2. What potential impact could a July rate cut have on savings account returns?
- 3. Fed Official Urges July Rate Cut Amid Economic Concerns
- 4. Mounting Pressure on the Federal Reserve
- 5. Key Economic Indicators Driving the Debate
- 6. The “FED Risk Premium” and Market Reaction
- 7. Potential Impacts of a July Rate Cut
- 8. Historical Precedents: Fed Responses to Economic slowdowns
- 9. What Investors should Do Now
breaking News: Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has issued a stark warning: the looming tariffs will inevitably lead to a “meaningful increase in inflation” in the coming months. Speaking on the economic impact of trade disputes, Powell detailed how the costs associated with tariffs will ripple through the supply chain, ultimately impacting the US consumer.
Powell explained that “everyone that I know is forecasting a meaningful increase in inflation in coming months from tariffs.” He elaborated on the mechanism, noting that “someone has to pay for the tariffs.” This burden will be distributed across the chain, involving manufacturers, exporters, importers, and retailers. While each player in this chain will attempt to avoid absorbing the cost, Powell acknowledged, “ultimately, the cost of the tariff has to be paid. And some of it will fall on the end consumer.” This suggests a direct impact on household budgets as the price of goods rises.
In a move that will likely temper market expectations for immediate monetary easing, Powell also reiterated the Fed’s “wait and watch” approach regarding interest rate adjustments. He effectively ruled out the possibility of rate cuts in the near term,stating,”The economy seems to be in solid shape,so the labor market is not crying out for a rate cut.” This sentiment was echoed in his recent testimony before the House Financial Services Committee, where he emphasized the Fed’s current cozy position to “wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance.”
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) remains focused on its mandate to keep long-term inflation expectations “well anchored” and to prevent temporary price shocks from becoming persistent inflationary problems. This commitment to price stability underpins the Fed’s cautious stance.
Market sentiment aligns with Powell’s assessment. The CME FedWatch tool indicates an overwhelming consensus, with 95.9% of traders anticipating no change in interest rates at the upcoming July meeting, reflecting a broad understanding of the Fed’s current monetary policy outlook.Evergreen Insights:
The enduring Impact of Tariffs: Powell’s comments highlight a fundamental economic principle: protectionist measures like tariffs rarely come without a cost. The prediction of inflation stemming from tariffs serves as a reminder that trade policies have tangible effects on domestic prices and consumer purchasing power. Understanding how these costs are absorbed or passed on is crucial for assessing the broader economic landscape.
The Fed’s Dual Mandate in Action: The federal Reserve operates with a dual mandate of maximum employment and price stability. Powell’s remarks demonstrate how these objectives can sometimes be in tension, especially when external factors like trade policy threaten to reignite inflation. The Fed’s willingness to “wait and watch” in a solid economy underscores its commitment to its price stability mandate.
Market Anticipation and Fed communication: The reliability of tools like the CME FedWatch reflects the market’s ability to interpret Fed communications and anticipate policy decisions. Powell’s clear messaging on inflation and rate cuts provides valuable guidance for investors and businesses, influencing their strategies and expectations. This ongoing dialogue between the Fed and the market is a critical component of modern monetary policy.
The Consumer as the Ultimate bearer of Costs: Powell’s direct assertion that “some of it will fall on the end consumer” is a critical takeaway. It emphasizes that while businesses may initially absorb some tariff costs, thay are often unable to do so indefinitely. Savers and spenders alike must remain aware of how geopolitical and trade decisions can directly influence their personal finances.
What potential impact could a July rate cut have on savings account returns?
Fed Official Urges July Rate Cut Amid Economic Concerns
Mounting Pressure on the Federal Reserve
Recent statements from a key federal Reserve official are adding fuel to the fire regarding potential interest rate cuts in July. The official, speaking on background to several financial news outlets, cited growing concerns about a slowdown in economic growth and weakening labor market indicators as justification for a more dovish monetary policy. This comes amidst ongoing debate about the trajectory of inflation, interest rates, and the overall health of the U.S. economy. The call for a rate cut is a meaningful shift from earlier hawkish rhetoric, signaling a potential pivot by the Fed.
Key Economic Indicators Driving the Debate
Several economic data points are contributing to the growing pressure on the Fed to consider a rate reduction. These include:
Slowing GDP Growth: Recent GDP figures have shown a deceleration in economic expansion, raising fears of a potential recession.
Cooling Labor Market: While still relatively strong, the labor market is showing signs of cooling, with job growth slowing and unemployment claims ticking upwards.
Falling Inflation: Inflation, while still above the Fed’s 2% target, has been steadily declining in recent months, providing some breathing room for the central bank.
Weakening Manufacturing Data: The manufacturing sector, frequently enough seen as a bellwether for the broader economy, has been experiencing a contraction.
Consumer Sentiment: Consumer confidence has dipped, reflecting concerns about the economic outlook.
These indicators are prompting analysts to reassess their forecasts for monetary policy and the likelihood of a Federal Reserve rate cut.
The market is already pricing in a higher probability of a rate cut, as reflected in the FED risk premium. According to recent analysis (as of July 19, 2025), the FED risk premium – calculated as the inverse of the stock market’s price-to-earnings ratio minus the 10-year Treasury yield – is currently indicating increased risk aversion. This suggests investors are demanding a higher return for holding stocks relative to bonds, a typical sign of economic uncertainty.
This shift in sentiment has been reflected in:
Bond yields: Treasury yields have fallen as investors flock to the safety of government bonds.
Stock Market Volatility: The stock market has experienced increased volatility, with investors reacting to the changing economic outlook.
Dollar Weakness: The U.S. dollar has weakened against other major currencies, as expectations for lower interest rates reduce its attractiveness to foreign investors.
Potential Impacts of a July Rate Cut
A rate cut in July could have several significant impacts on the economy:
Lower Borrowing Costs: Reduced interest rates would lower borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, potentially stimulating investment and spending.
Increased Economic Activity: Lower borrowing costs could lead to increased economic activity, helping to avert a recession.
Higher Asset Prices: Lower interest rates typically boost asset prices, including stocks and real estate.
Weaker Dollar: A rate cut could further weaken the U.S. dollar, potentially boosting exports.
However, a rate cut also carries risks:
inflation Rebound: Lower interest rates could fuel inflation, potentially undoing the progress made in recent months.
asset Bubbles: Excessively low interest rates could contribute to the formation of asset bubbles.
Reduced Savings Returns: Lower interest rates would reduce returns on savings accounts and other fixed-income investments.
Historical Precedents: Fed Responses to Economic slowdowns
Looking back, the Federal Reserve has a history of responding to economic slowdowns with interest rate cuts.
2001 Recession: The Fed aggressively cut interest rates in 2001 in response to the dot-com bubble burst and the ensuing recession.
2008 financial Crisis: During the 2008 financial crisis, the Fed slashed interest rates to near zero and implemented unconventional monetary policies, such as quantitative easing, to stabilize the financial system and stimulate the economy.
COVID-19 Pandemic (2020): In response to the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed again lowered interest rates to near zero and launched another round of quantitative easing.
These historical examples demonstrate the Fed’s willingness to act decisively to support the economy during times of crisis.
What Investors should Do Now
Given the current economic uncertainty and the potential for a rate cut, investors should consider the following:
Diversify Portfolios: Diversification is key to mitigating risk in a volatile market.
**Re-evaluate