FICAC Pursues Pryde Over Alleged Abuse of Office

Fiji Pursues Extradition Of director of Public Prosecutions

Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption‘s Acting Commissioner,Lavi Rokoika,has initiated extradition proceedings against Director of Public Prosecutions,Christopher Pryde. Documents were filed today in the Suva Magistrates’ Court to begin the process.

Pryde Faces Charges. He is accused of two counts of abuse of office, along with two alternative counts of causing a loss and obtaining a financial advantage. These charges stem from allegations of improper payments received during his time as DPP.

Court Proceedings Underway. Magistrate Yogesh Prasad heard submissions from FICAC representatives. they presented the extradition submission, including affidavits from the investigating officer and Manager Legal, as well as supporting documentation like the certification of record and a draft warrant of arrest.

Extradition Process Details. Once the documents are endorsed, FICAC will work with the Attorney General’s office to continue the extradition process. Magistrate Prasad disclosed a previous, brief connection to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions but stated he would continue presiding over the case unless pryde objects.

Timeline Established. The court has granted FICAC 28 days to finalize the extradition process. The matter is scheduled to resume on September 15th.

Stream the best of Fiji on VITI+. anytime. Anywhere.

What are your thoughts on this developing story? Share your comments below and let us know what you think.

What specific provisions of the Public Service Act are alleged to have been breached through the misuse of police resources for Tiko Construction?

The Allegations: A Breakdown of the Charges

The Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) is actively pursuing former prime Minister Frank Bainimarama and suspended Police Commissioner Sitiveni Qiliho, along with several others, including Iowane Tiko, in connection with allegations of abuse of office. The core of the case revolves around claims that bainimarama directed resources and personnel within the Fiji Police Force to benefit his daughter, Adi Litia BainimaramaS, private business – a construction company called tiko Construction.

Specifically, FICAC alleges that:

Misuse of Police Resources: Police officers and equipment were allegedly diverted from official duties to perform work for Tiko Construction, including providing security and logistical support. This constitutes a potential breach of the Public Service Act and the Police Act.

Conflict of Interest: Bainimarama’s familial connection to the owner of Tiko Construction created a clear conflict of interest, potentially influencing decisions regarding government contracts and resource allocation.

Abuse of Authority: The alleged direction to utilize police resources for private gain is considered an abuse of the Prime Minister’s authority and a violation of public trust.

fraudulent Intent: FICAC is investigating whether the actions were deliberately intended to defraud the government and gain an unfair advantage for Tiko Construction.

Key Individuals Involved & Thier Roles

Understanding the roles of the key players is crucial to grasping the complexity of this case.

Frank Bainimarama: Former Prime Minister of Fiji. Accused of directing the misuse of police resources.

Sitiveni Qiliho: Suspended Police Commissioner. Allegedly facilitated the deployment of police personnel and resources to Tiko Construction.

Iowane Tiko: Director of Tiko Construction and son-in-law of Frank Bainimarama. The company at the center of the allegations.

Adi Litia Bainimarama: Daughter of Frank bainimarama and owner of Tiko Construction.

FICAC Investigators: Leading the investigation and gathering evidence to support the charges.

The Legal Framework & Potential Penalties

The prosecution is building its case under several key pieces of legislation:

The Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 2010: Provides FICAC with the authority to investigate and prosecute corruption-related offenses.

The Public Service Act: Governs the conduct and responsibilities of public officers, including the proper use of government resources.

The Police Act: Outlines the duties and responsibilities of police officers and the proper use of police resources.

The Crimes Act: Addresses offenses such as fraud, abuse of authority, and conspiracy.

If convicted, the accused could face meaningful penalties, including:

Imprisonment: Depending on the severity of the offenses, sentences could range from several years to potentially decades.

Fines: Ample financial penalties could be imposed.

Disqualification from Public Office: A conviction could permanently disqualify the accused from holding any public office.

Asset Forfeiture: FICAC may seek to seize assets acquired through alleged corrupt practices.

Evidence Presented by FICAC (as of August 6, 2025)

While the full extent of the evidence remains under wraps due to ongoing legal proceedings, FICAC has publicly stated that it possesses:

Documentary Evidence: Including official memos, emails, and financial records allegedly demonstrating the direction of resources to Tiko construction.

Witness testimony: statements from police officers and other individuals who allegedly witnessed the misuse of resources.

Financial Records: Analysis of Tiko Construction’s financial transactions to identify any irregularities or illicit gains.

Forensic Analysis: Examination of electronic devices and data to uncover further evidence of wrongdoing.

The Defense’s Stance & counterarguments

The accused have maintained their innocence and are expected to vigorously defend themselves against the charges. Common defense strategies likely to be employed include:

Challenging the Evidence: Questioning the authenticity and reliability of the evidence presented by FICAC.

Lack of Intent: Arguing that any actions taken were not motivated by corrupt intent.

Procedural Irregularities: Raising concerns about the legality of FICAC’s investigation and the handling of evidence.

Political Motivation: Suggesting that the charges are politically motivated.

Impact on Fiji’s Political landscape

This case has significant implications for Fiji’s political landscape. It represents a high-profile test of FICAC’s independence and its commitment to combating corruption. The outcome of the trial could:

Strengthen Rule of Law: A prosperous prosecution would send a strong message that corruption will not be tolerated.

Erode Public Trust: A failure to secure a conviction could undermine public confidence in the government and the justice system.

Influence Future elections: The case could influence voter sentiment and the outcome of future elections.

Set a Precedent: The legal proceedings will establish a precedent for future corruption cases in Fiji.

Related Search Terms & Keywords

Fiji Corruption

FICAC Investigation

Frank Bainimarama Allegations

Tiko Construction

Police Misconduct Fiji

*