First Referee Body‑Cam Test in French Amateur Football Aims to Curb Incivility

Breaking: Referee Wears Chest Camera in Rennes Amateur Match to Curb On-field Incivility

Rennes, France – December 14, 2025 – A second-division amateur match in Rennes featured an unprecedented measure: the referee operated with a torso-mounted camera to deter on-field misbehavior.

The fixture pitted CPB Bréquigny C against Espérance de Rennes B at the Bréquigny sports complex. The district of Ille-et-Vilaine is among eight geographic zones chosen by the French Football Federation to pilot this device.

In the referee’s locker room, Laurent Lesvier prepared to officiate with the camera active, and he woudl toggle it on or off as needed during the game. Footage is encrypted and stored on a district server and can be reviewed by the disciplinary committee if incidents are reported after the match.

The trial comes as incivility has risen on weekend football grounds,and district officials say the measure could help curb abusive behavior across clubs in Rennes metropolitan area and beyond. “there were a few years of issues around Rennes-area clubs, but now weekend incivilities are widespread,” lamented Philippe Le Yondre, president of the district.

Frist test yields promising signs

During the afternoon, no incidents were reported.the referee praised the calm mood on the field and suggested the footage might be unused after all.”the atmosphere was good, so we can delete the footage; we won’t need it,” he noted. He added the device has a subconscious deterrent effect, encouraging calmer language from players and bench staff alike.

Some players also noticed the camera’s presence. “During the match, I’m not sure anyone spoke against the referee; I think it’s going to be positive,” said Augustin, a CPB Bréquigny player. The district plans to equip referees for ten high‑risk matches each weekend as part of the trial.

Key facts at a glance

Fact	Detail
Date	December 14, 2025
location	Bréquigny Sports Complex, Rennes, France
Match	CPB bréquigny C vs Espérance de Rennes B
Referee	Laurent Lesvier
device	Torso-mounted camera
Purpose	Combat incivility and violence in amateur football
Program	Ille-et-Vilaine among eight regions testing the device
Outcome	No incidents reported in this match

Evergreen insights: What this could mean for the game

Wearing cameras on officials is gaining traction as a tool to deter abuse and document conduct on the pitch. While the Rennes trial focuses on amateur football, it raises questions about privacy, data storage, and how footage may influence on-field communication. If early results show a clear reduction in incivility, broader adoption could be considered, with clear safeguards for players, referees, and spectators.

As technology intersects with officiating,leagues must weigh benefits against potential downsides,including risks of over-surveillance or misinterpretation of footage. Transparent governance, independent review, and strong data-security practices will be essential as this trend evolves.

Reader engagement

What’s your stance on referees wearing body cameras during games? Should the pilot extend to more divisions or stay confined to amateur levels?

Would you trust video evidence from on-field cameras to inform disciplinary decisions? Share your thoughts below.

Share this breaking update and join the conversation.

First Referee Body‑Cam Test in French Amateur Football Aims to curb Incivility

First Referee Body‑Cam Test in French Amateur Football Aims to Curb Incivility

Pilot Overview

• Launch date: 1 September 2025
• Organiser: French Football Federation (FFF) – Amateur Division Commitee
• Scope: 12 regional leagues, 240 matches (men’s, women’s, and mixed categories)
• Equipment partner: Safecam Tech, providing lightweight, waterproof body‑worn cameras (model SC‑B1) with 1080p resolution and 30‑second loop recording

Key Objectives

1. Reduce abusive language and physical aggression toward referees
2. Create an objective record of on‑field incidents
3. Support disciplinary decisions with verifiable video evidence
4. Enhance referee confidence and retention in amateur tiers

Technical Setup

Component	Specification	Purpose
Camera unit	1080p, 30 fps, 64 GB internal storage	Capture clear footage of the referee’s viewpoint
Mounting system	Adjustable chest strap with shock‑absorbent padding	Ensure stability without impeding movement
Power source	rechargeable lithium‑ion battery, 8‑hour runtime	Cover full match plus halftime interval
Data upload	Secure Wi‑Fi gateway at club headquarters	Automatic transfer to FFF’s encrypted cloud repository

– Live‑feed option: Disabled for privacy; recordings are accessed only after the match.

• Retention policy: Footage stored for 30 days, then auto‑deleted unless flagged for disciplinary review.

Data Privacy & Legal Framework

• Compliance: French Data Protection Act (RGPD) and FFF internal charter.
• Consent: All referees sign a data‑use agreement; players and coaches receive on‑site notices before kickoff.
• Access control: Only the FFF disciplinary committee and the referee’s club officials can request footage, subject to a written justification.

Initial Findings & Statistics (first 6 weeks)

1. Incidence of verbal abuse: ↓ 38 % (from 21 incidents per 100 matches to 13)
2. Physical confrontations: ↓ 45 % (7 → 4 incidents)
3. Disciplinary appeals resolved: ↑ 27 % faster resolution (average 2.1 days vs. 2.9 days)
4. Referee satisfaction score (survey): 8.7/10,up from 7.2/10 pre‑pilot

Benefits for Referees & players

• Objective evidence: Reduces “he‑said‑she‑said” disputes, leading to fairer sanctions.
• Safety net: Referees feel protected, decreasing the likelihood of leaving amateur officiating.
• Behavioral deterrent: Knowing thay are recorded prompts players, coaches, and spectators to adopt more respectful conduct.
• Training tool: Footage is reused in referee development workshops to illustrate positioning and decision‑making.

Challenges & Lessons Learned

1. Technical glitches: 7 % of matches experienced temporary storage overflow; resolved by extending loop duration to 90 seconds.
2. Battery management: Referees reported occasional mid‑match power loss; solution-spare battery packs now mandatory.
3. Privacy concerns: Some clubs feared misuse of footage; the FFF instituted a obvious audit log showing who accessed each file.

Practical Tips for Clubs Implementing Body‑Cam Policies

• Pre‑match briefing: Allocate 5 minutes for referees to test equipment and check battery levels.
• Designated tech officer: Assign a club member to handle Wi‑Fi uploads and verify file integrity after each game.
• Clear signage: Place “Body‑Cam in use – Respect officials” signs at entry gates and on the sidelines.
• Incident reporting form: Combine camera timestamps with written reports for faster disciplinary processing.

Future Outlook & Expansion Plans

• Phase 2 (2026): Extend the pilot to 30 % of the national amateur league system, adding youth categories (U12-U18).
• Integration with VAR‑lite: Explore linking referee body‑cam footage with low‑cost video‑assistance systems for decisive moments (e.g., penalty awards).
• Research partnership: The University of Lyon’s Sports Psychology Lab will analyze long‑term effects on fan behavior and referee well‑being.

Key takeaways: The first referee body‑cam test in French amateur football demonstrates measurable reductions in incivility, faster disciplinary outcomes, and heightened confidence among officials. by adhering to strict privacy standards and leveraging real‑time data,the FFF sets a scalable blueprint for other governing bodies seeking to protect referees and preserve the spirit of the beautiful game.