South Korean food exporters are facing increasing scrutiny regarding food additive regulations in international markets, with varying standards potentially leading to shipment rejections. A recent report highlights the complexities of “carry-over” regulations – the presence of a prohibited food additive in a final product due to its use in an ingredient – and the need for exporters to understand specific country requirements. The report, released on February 24, 2026, underscores the importance of meticulous ingredient sourcing and labeling practices to avoid trade disruptions.
The issue centers around the fact that while an additive might be prohibited for direct use in a final food product, trace amounts originating from permitted ingredients are often permitted – but the allowable levels and testing methods differ significantly across nations. This creates a challenging landscape for K-food companies aiming to expand their global reach. Understanding these nuances is crucial to ensure compliance and maintain access to key export markets.
The Korea Food Safety Information Institute’s report focuses on the regulations surrounding food additive carry-over, comparing the approaches of major importing countries. It details differences in principles for allowing carry-over, which food categories are exempt, the technical criteria used to determine acceptable levels and the requirements for labeling. According to the report, the European Union and Australia, for example, specifically exclude infant formula and similar products from carry-over allowances.
Crucially, the report emphasizes that if the food additive in question is an allergen, clear and accurate labeling is mandatory, regardless of the carry-over level. This aligns with global trends towards increased transparency in food labeling to protect consumers with allergies. The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in South Korea has been actively informing food importers about changes to allergen labeling regulations, particularly those related to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code, which came into effect on February 25, 2024.
Key Allergen Labeling Requirements
The updated regulations require clear identification of allergenic substances, including their presence in raw materials, food additives, or processing aids. Specifically, the following allergens must be declared:
- Sulfites (at concentrations of 10mg/kg or higher)
- Almonds
- Fish, Crustaceans, and Mollusks
- Brazil nuts
- Lupin
- Milk
- Cashews
- Peanuts
- Sesame seeds
- Hazelnuts
- Soybeans
- Macadamia nuts
- Wheat (including gluten-containing varieties)
- Pistachios
- Rye
- Walnuts
- Barley
- Oats
Labeling must adhere to specific formats, such as including the allergen name within the ingredient list or using phrases like “Contains [allergen]” or “Gluten” when applicable. The Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code provides detailed guidance on these requirements.
Navigating Carry-Over Regulations
The concept of food additive carry-over allows for trace amounts of a prohibited substance to be present if it originates from a permitted ingredient. Though, the report stresses that exporters must verify the specific regulations of each importing country. For instance, some nations have stricter technical criteria for determining whether carry-over is permissible, while others have different labeling requirements. The Food Safety Information Institute emphasizes that exporters should proactively confirm the acceptable carry-over levels and testing protocols for each target market.
The report also highlights the importance of understanding the “trade period” allowances. In some cases, products manufactured before the implementation of new regulations may be sold for a limited time, provided they were packaged and labeled according to the previous standards. However, these allowances are time-bound and vary by country.
Support for K-Food Exporters
The Korea Food Safety Information Institute is actively supporting K-food exporters by providing information on international allergen management standards and offering technical assistance, including allergen testing and analysis. This support aims to help companies navigate the complex regulatory landscape and ensure their products meet the requirements of global markets. The Korean Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation (KATI) is also providing resources to assist exporters.
Looking ahead, continued harmonization of food additive regulations internationally would significantly benefit exporters. However, in the absence of a unified global standard, K-food companies must prioritize thorough research and proactive compliance to maintain their competitive edge and ensure consumer safety.
Have you encountered challenges with food additive regulations in international trade? Share your experiences in the comments below.
Disclaimer: This article provides informational content only and should not be considered professional advice. Consult with relevant regulatory experts for specific guidance on food safety and export compliance.
