Geisse’s Mirror Kardashian: Network Furious Over Cloning Claims

Geissens Spark Outrage with “Bag on Head” Photos Following Robbery

EXCLUSIVE: Saint-Tropez, france – Reality TV stars Carmen and Robert Geiss have ignited a firestorm of criticism on social media after posting photos of themselves with designer bags placed on their heads, a stunt that many fans find insensitive and tone-deaf, especially in the wake of a recent robbery.

The controversial images, shared by Carmen Geiss on Instagram, appear to be a tongue-in-cheek imitation of a similar pose struck by Kylie Jenner.Carmen captioned the post, referencing her husband Robert as the photographer and questioning if her imitation would achieve the same viral status, predicting “Probably more drama, even more style, even more clicks.”

However, the online reaction has been far from the viral acclaim she might have anticipated. Instead, a meaningful portion of their followers expressed dismay and confusion.”Why do you turn things upside down?” and “What’s the shit with your bags on your head,” were common sentiments, highlighting a disconnect between the couple’s playful approach and the community’s perception of their recent ordeal.

Evergreen Insight: Social media trends, while seemingly harmless, can be perceived very differently depending on personal experiences and societal context. What one person intends as lighthearted imitation can be interpreted as a profound lack of empathy by others, especially when juxtaposed with sensitive events.

The Geissens’ flaunting of wealth also drew considerable ire. Many commenters voiced their disapproval of the couple displaying expensive designer items, particularly after suffering a robbery. “The next attack is coming! No wonder with such showing behavior!” one user warned, while another stated, “So I don’t know and find it very questionable that you can celebrate again after such a robbery…” The sentiment suggests a feeling that the couple’s actions, in the eyes of some, invite further negative attention and demonstrate a lack of awareness regarding the struggles of others.

Evergreen Insight: Public figures often face scrutiny regarding their perceived social responsibility.When wealth and luxury are displayed prominently, especially after experiencing hardship, it can create a perception of detachment from the realities faced by a broader audience, leading to accusations of insensitivity.

In response to the mounting backlash, Carmen Geiss shared a defiant selfie with husband Robert, addressing the criticism head-on.She acknowledged the robbery in Saint-Tropez and admitted that the world “is no longer like before,” citing Monaco and Dubai as places where she feels truly safe. However, she quickly pivoted to a message of resilience, declaring, “We don’t let life take ourselves – we just live it even louder!”

Evergreen Insight: Adversity can be a catalyst for redefining one’s viewpoint on life. While external circumstances may change, the internal decision to embrace life with vigor, rather than succumbing to fear or negativity, is a powerful testament to human resilience. This sentiment, though intended to be empowering, highlights the ongoing challenge public figures face in navigating their personal narratives in the public sphere.

What legal claims could Kim Kardashian pursue against Geissele Automatics, considering the use of a look-alike in thier advertising campaign?

The Controversy explained: Geissele Automatics & Kim Kardashian Likeness

The internet exploded this week with claims surrounding Geissele Automatics, a firearms manufacturer, and their marketing campaign featuring a model bearing a striking resemblance to Kim Kardashian. Dubbed “Geissele’s Mirror Kardashian” by social media users, the campaign has ignited a firestorm of controversy, leading to significant backlash and reportedly, a furious response from the Kardashian’s legal team and associated networks. This article dives into the details of the Kim Kardashian clone controversy, the legal implications, and the impact on Geissele Automatics’ brand.

What Exactly Happened? The Marketing Campaign & Initial Reactions

Geissele Automatics launched a series of advertisements featuring a woman many immediately identified as a Kim Kardashian look-alike. The campaign, promoting firearm accessories, utilized imagery and styling heavily reminiscent of Kardashian’s aesthetic.

Initial Social Media Response: The campaign quickly went viral, with users on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, and TikTok expressing shock, amusement, and outrage. Hashtags like #GeisseleKardashian and #KimKardashianClone trended rapidly.

The Core Issue: Right of Publicity: The central concern revolves around the right of publicity – the right of an individual to control the commercial use of their name, image, and likeness.Using someone who looks like Kim Kardashian without her consent raises serious legal questions.

Geissele’s Stance (as of July 21, 2025): As of this writing, Geissele Automatics has issued a limited statement acknowledging the controversy but maintaining they did not explicitly claim the model was Kim Kardashian.They’ve emphasized the intent was to create a visually striking campaign, not to impersonate the celebrity.

Legal Ramifications: Right of Publicity & Potential Lawsuits

The legal landscape surrounding the right of publicity is complex and varies by state. However,several potential legal avenues are open to Kim Kardashian and her representatives.

Violation of Right of Publicity: This is the most likely claim. Even without explicitly stating the model is Kardashian, the deliberate use of her likeness to attract attention could be deemed a violation.

False Endorsement: If consumers were led to believe Kardashian endorsed Geissele Automatics’ products, a false endorsement claim could be pursued.

Defamation (Potential): While less likely, if the campaign portrays Kardashian in a negative light (even implicitly), a defamation claim could be considered.

Network Concerns: Reports indicate networks that partner with Kardashian are concerned about brand safety and potential damage to their own reputations. This could lead to further legal pressure on Geissele.

The Impact on Geissele Automatics: Brand Damage & Sales

The controversy has already had a noticeable impact on Geissele Automatics.

Social Media backlash: The company has faced a barrage of negative comments and calls for boycotts on social media.

Potential Loss of Customers: Consumers who are fans of Kardashian or object to the campaign’s tactics may choose to avoid Geissele products.

PR Crisis: Managing the public relations fallout is proving challenging for Geissele, requiring a careful and strategic response.

Sales Data (Early Indicators): Preliminary sales data suggests a slight dip in accessory sales sence the campaign launched,though it’s too early to determine the long-term effect.

Similar cases & Precedents: Celebrity Likeness & Advertising

This isn’t the first time a company has faced legal challenges for using a celebrity’s likeness without permission.

Vanna White vs. samsung (1992): A landmark case establishing the right of publicity. Samsung used a robot resembling Vanna White in an advertisement, and she successfully sued for violating her right of publicity.

Michael Jordan vs. Jewel Food Stores (1998): Jordan successfully sued Jewel Food Stores for using a look-alike in an advertisement congratulating him on his NBA championship.

the Importance of Clear Disclaimers: these cases highlight the importance of clear disclaimers when using look-alikes in advertising. Simply stating “resembles” is often not enough to avoid legal trouble.

Understanding Right of Publicity Laws: A State-by-State Overview

Right of publicity laws vary significantly across the United States. Here’s a brief overview:

California: Has strong right of publicity laws, protecting not only name and likeness but also voice and signature.

New York: Also offers robust protection, but with some exceptions for news and public affairs.

Florida: Offers protection even after death, allowing estates to control the use of a deceased celebrity’s likeness.

Federal Law: There is no federal right of publicity law, leaving protection to individual state laws.

Practical Tips for Advertisers: Avoiding Legal Pitfalls

To avoid similar controversies, advertisers should consider the following:

1. Obtain explicit Consent: Always obtain written consent from individuals before using their name, image, or likeness in advertising.
2. Use Clear Disclaimers: If using a look-alike, include a prominent disclaimer stating that the model is not the celebrity.
3. Consult with Legal Counsel: Before launching any campaign that utilizes celebrity likeness, consult with an