Helsinki’s Forest Conservation Goal Falters Due to Insufficient Funding in South Savo

News">

Finland Scales Up Forest Conservation Efforts Nationwide

September 12, 2025

Helsinki, Finland – A nationwide expansion of Finland’s voluntary forest protection program, known as Metso, is underway, with ambitious goals to safeguard 80,000 hectares of valuable forestland by the year 2030.The initiative, which relies on voluntary agreements with landowners, will now encompass Lapland and the easternmost and northernmost regions of the country, in addition to its existing coverage in southern Finland.

Expanding the Scope of Conservation

The Ministry of the Environment has authorized the program’s expansion, signaling a significant commitment to biodiversity preservation.Currently, approximately six percent of Southern Finland’s forests are protected under the Metso program. The broadened scope will prioritize the preservation of old-growth and natural forests,notably in northern Finland,where 10,000 hectares are slated for permanent protection.

Between 2026 and 2030, the program aims to permanently protect an additional 50,000 hectares and establish fixed-term protection for 30,000 hectares, with temporary protections lasting for a decade. The program centers on voluntary participation from forest owners, offering financial compensation for participation.

Funding Concerns Threaten Ambitious Targets

Despite the ambitious goals, concerns are mounting regarding sufficient funding to support the program fully. Environmental Counselor Esa Pynnönen of the Ministry of the Environment estimates that achieving the permanent protection targets will require a substantial investment of $300 million, while fixed-term protection necessitates approximately EUR 100 million.

Currently, only over EUR 20 million is allocated annually, falling short of the required amount. Pynnönen stated that a threefold increase in funding is necessary to meet the program’s objectives. The Ministry acknowledges that annual funding levels may affect the program’s eventual success, allowing for versatility in achieving its stated goals.

According to data released by the Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) earlier this year, roughly 13 percent of Finland’s 26 million hectares of forestland is currently protected. The majority of existing protection is concentrated in Lapland,Northern Ostrobothnia,and kainuu.

Regional Disparities in Protection Efforts

Progress under the Metso program has been uneven across different regions. South Savo, despite its rich forest resources, has lagged behind in achieving its protection targets. Since the program’s inception in 2008, only approximately 2,300 hectares have been secured under fixed-term protection in South Savo, significantly less than the 6,000-hectare goal set by the South Savo Forest Program 2021-2025.

Forestry Center Finance and Inspection manager Jarkko Partanen notes that around 10,000 hectares in South Savo could benefit from protection,particularly areas containing watercourses,groves,and wooded cliffs.Compensation for participating landowners averages EUR 3,500 per hectare, adjusted upwards based on forest density and the presence of valuable deadwood.

Region	Metso Program Target (Hectares)	Hectares Protected (as of 2023)
South Savo	6,000	2,300
Lapland	Variable (Ongoing Expansion)	Significant Existing Protection
Southern Finland (Overall)	80,000 (by 2030)	96,000 (Permanently) + 72,000 (Fixed-Term)

Understanding Forest Conservation in Finland

Finland has a long-standing commitment to lasting forestry and biodiversity conservation. The Metso program represents a key component of this strategy, offering a voluntary, incentive-based approach to protecting valuable forest ecosystems.The program aims to balance economic interests with environmental preservation, recognizing the importance of forests for both their ecological value and their contribution to the Finnish economy.

Did You No? Finland is one of the most heavily forested countries in Europe, with forests covering approximately 75% of its land area.

Pro Tip: Landowners interested in participating in the Metso program should contact their local forestry center for detailed facts on eligibility requirements and compensation options.

Frequently Asked Questions about the Metso Program

What is the Metso program?

Metso is a voluntary forest protection program in Finland designed to preserve biodiversity by compensating landowners for protecting valuable forest habitats.

what types of areas are suitable for Metso protection?

Suitable areas include old-growth forests, diverse woodlands, mires, and habitats supporting threatened species.

How are landowners compensated for participating?

Landowners receive financial compensation based on the area and quality of the protected land, including incentives for the presence of deadwood.

Is the Metso program mandatory?

No, participation in the Metso program is entirely voluntary.

What is the current funding situation for the metso program?

The program currently faces funding shortfalls, possibly hindering its ability to meet its ambitious conservation targets.

How does the Metso program contribute to finland’s environmental goals?

The program plays a key role in enhancing biodiversity, preserving natural habitats, and mitigating the impacts of climate change.

What are your thoughts on the balance between economic progress and environmental protection? Share your opinions in the comments below!

what specific economic consequences are South Savo landowners experiencing due to the delays in Helsinki’s forest conservation projects?

The South Savo Impact: A Critical Setback for Helsinki’s Green initiative

Helsinki’s aspiring plan to offset its carbon footprint through extensive forest conservation efforts in South Savo is facing significant hurdles. The core strategy, reliant on preserving and expanding forested areas outside the capital, is demonstrably slowing due to a lack of allocated funding. This impacts not only Helsinki’s environmental targets but also the biodiversity and economic stability of the South Savo region. the city, a major economic and cultural hub of Finland – as established as its founding in 1550 – is finding its sustainability goals increasingly arduous to reach.

Funding Shortfalls and Project Delays

Originally slated for completion by 2028, several key forest acquisition and reforestation projects in South Savo are now facing indefinite delays. The initial budget,approved in 2023,proved insufficient to account for rising land values and increased operational costs.

* Land Acquisition Costs: The price of forested land in South Savo has increased by an average of 15% in the last two years, driven by demand from timber companies and private investors.

* Reforestation Expenses: Climate change-induced weather patterns, including more frequent droughts and wildfires, are increasing the cost of reforestation efforts. Seedling survival rates are down, requiring more intensive planting and maintenance.

* Monitoring & Management: Long-term forest health monitoring,crucial for verifying carbon sequestration,requires consistent funding for ecological surveys and data analysis. This aspect is currently underfunded.

These factors have led to a projected funding gap of approximately €8 million over the next three years,according to a recent report by the South Savo Regional Council.

The Role of Carbon Offsetting and Helsinki’s Strategy

Helsinki’s commitment to becoming carbon neutral by 2035 heavily relies on carbon offsetting. Recognizing that eliminating all internal emissions is challenging, the city adopted a strategy of investing in forest conservation projects that demonstrably sequester carbon dioxide. South Savo was chosen as a primary location due to its:

1. Proximity: Relatively close proximity to Helsinki allows for easier monitoring and management.
2. Land Availability: South Savo possesses significant areas of privately-owned forested land suitable for conservation.
3. Ecological Value: The region boasts diverse forest ecosystems, including old-growth forests and valuable habitats for endangered species.

The plan involved purchasing land from private owners, implementing enduring forestry practices, and establishing protected areas. Though, the current funding crisis threatens to derail these efforts.

Impact on South Savo’s Local Economy

The conservation initiative was initially welcomed in South Savo as a potential economic boost. The promise of investment in sustainable forestry and eco-tourism offered a diversification of the region’s traditionally timber-focused economy. However, the delays are now creating uncertainty and impacting local businesses.

* Reduced Timber Sales: Landowners who were anticipating selling their land to Helsinki are now hesitant, fearing further delays or reduced offers.

* Job Losses: Reforestation and forest management projects have been scaled back, leading to temporary job losses in the forestry sector.

* Ecotourism Potential Undermined: the lack of progress on establishing protected areas is hindering the progress of ecotourism initiatives.

Alternative Funding Models and Potential Solutions

Addressing the funding shortfall requires a multi-faceted approach. Several potential solutions are being explored:

* Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborating with private companies interested in carbon offsetting could provide a significant influx of capital.

* EU Funding opportunities: Exploring available grants and funding programs from the European Union dedicated to climate action and biodiversity conservation.

* Carbon Credit Trading: generating revenue through the sale of verified carbon credits generated by the conserved forests.

* Increased Municipal Budget Allocation: Helsinki increasing its budgetary commitment to the South Savo conservation projects.

The Broader Implications for Finnish Climate Policy

The challenges faced by Helsinki’s forest conservation initiative highlight a broader issue within Finnish climate policy: the reliance on offsetting as a primary strategy for achieving carbon neutrality. While offsetting can play a role, it is indeed crucial to prioritize direct emission reductions and invest in long-term, sustainable solutions. the situation in South Savo serves as a cautionary tale, demonstrating the risks of underfunding and the importance of robust monitoring and evaluation. The city of Helsinki, established as a competitor to Tallinn in 1550, must reassess its approach to ensure its environmental goals are achievable and contribute to a truly sustainable future.