Breaking News: Trump’s Birth Citizenship Ban Now Effective in 28 States
An administrative order signed by US President Donald Trump has substantial repercussions across the nation. The US Supreme Court, in a landmark decision issued on Tuesday, affirmed that a single lower court cannot halt the federal policy nationwide. This ruling allows President Trump’s birth citizenship ban to come into effect in 28 states after a 30-day period, except for 22 states and Washington, DC.
Supreme Court Upholds Challenged Policy
Immediately following his inauguration in January, President Trump signed an executive order aimed at reducing birth citizenship for children born to illegal and non-citizen parents. Specifically, the order prevents citizenship for children if their mothers are illegal residents or temporary visitors and their fathers are neither citizens nor permanent residents.
Within days of the order, 22 states and Washington, DC, filed a lawsuit against this policy, arguing its unconstitutionality. Various lower courts subsequently suspended the policy, but the Supreme Court intervened. The Court ruled that the nationwide suspension imposed by a lower court exceeded its authority, thereby validating the policy in regions where no lawsuit had been filed.
The Court’s Rationale
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, among others, noted, “The extent of federal court authority must not be overstepped.” Liberal judge Jackson criticized the ruling for allowing “constitutional rights infringements on those who were not party to the lawsuit.”
Implications for US Society
President Trump celebrated the ruling, posting “Big Win” on his social media platforms. The complexity and controversy surrounding birth citizenship are poised to intensify across the US, with as many as 28 states enforcing the new policy within the coming month.
Historical Context and Future Outlook
Birthright citizenship, guaranteed by the 14th Amendment, has been a contentious issue in US politics for decades. While over 30 countries in the world grant birth citizenship, the US stands among a select few. Advocates argue it ensures that individuals born on US soil are equal, whereas critics claim it encourages undue immigration. This ruling is a part of broader trends to scrutinize immigration policies and could foreshadow further legislative action.
Where Do We Go From Here?
The policy’s effects will inevitably draw extensive legal scrutiny and societal debate. For now, stay tuned to archyde.com for up-to-date coverage on this evolving story.
Stay informed and involved, as this issue will continue to shape our national conversation and future policies. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest on immigration, citizenship, and legal updates.
