Home » Sport » IOC denounces Indonesia’s visa denial to Israeli gymnasts, urges sport remain a safe space

IOC denounces Indonesia’s visa denial to Israeli gymnasts, urges sport remain a safe space

by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor

Breaking: IOC Reaffirms Safety Rule As Indonesia Blocks Israel’s Gymnastics Team From World Championships

The International Olympic Committee has reiterated that sport must remain a safe space for all eligible athletes after no agreement emerged to allow Israel’s gymnasts to compete at the World Artistic Gymnastics Championships in Jakarta, scheduled for October 19-25.

Indonesia, which does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Israel, said it would not grant visas to the Israeli delegation in response to its Gaza conflict. The Israeli Gymnastics Federation condemned the decision as a dangerous precedent and faulted the International Gymnastics Federation for not stepping in.

A bid by Israel to obtain urgent provisional measures to ensure participation or to alter or cancel the event was rejected by the Court of Arbitration for Sport earlier this week.

With the competition set to begin, prospects for a swift resolution appeared unlikely after the IOC published a detailed statement confirming that no resolution had been found. The IOC said it had engaged with the FIG and Indonesia’s authorities to help facilitate a solution, but the matter remains unresolved. It underscored the core principle that athletes must compete without discrimination, a principle the host country is responsible for upholding.

Among the athletes impacted is Artem Dolgopyat, the defending world floor champion and Tokyo 2020 Olympic gold medalist, who would miss a crucial opportunity to defend his title.

The IOC reiterated that eligible athletes, teams and officials must be able to participate in events under the olympic charter without discrimination by the host nation, stressing that this responsibility lies squarely with the hosting country.The organization noted that its executive board will review the situation in its upcoming meeting.

Indonesia has defended its stance by invoking longstanding political principles. the decision echoes past frictions, including a 1962 policy that blocked Israeli athletes from Indonesian-hosted events, which affected Israel’s participation in subsequent Olympic Games. The IOC’s position was eventually reconsidered, but Indonesia later declined to participate in certain events.

Context around the broader conflict includes the Gaza war following Hamas’ October 7, 2023 attack on southern Israel. The fighting has produced substantial casualties and widespread damage, drawing responses from international bodies and human rights organizations. Recent negotiations have included ceasefire elements that led to the temporary reunification of some Israeli hostages with family members, as reported by major outlets.

For readers seeking more context, the IOC’s official updates and coverage from reputable outlets offer the clearest picture of the ongoing discussions. IOC statement can be consulted for the governing body’s perspective, and BBC coverage provides additional reporting on the developments.

key Facts At A Glance

Item Detail
Event World Artistic Gymnastics Championships
Location Jakarta, Indonesia
Dates october 19-25
Israel team status Visas denied by host nation
IGF stance Describes move as a dangerous precedent
CAS ruling Urgent provisional measures rejected
IOC message Sport must be a safe space; non-discrimination essential
Affected athletes Artem Dolgopyat among those unable to compete

Why This Matters Beyond the Arena

This episode underscores the ongoing tension between geopolitics and global sport. While the Olympic charter enshrines equal access, host nations retain some influence over participation decisions, a dynamic that shapes policy, hosting guidelines, and the lived experience of athletes around the world. The debate also spotlights how international sports bodies may need clearer frameworks to manage political disputes while preserving fair competition.

Two questions for readers: Should host countries be compelled to guarantee participation for all eligible athletes despite political tensions? How can international sports bodies better navigate diplomatic disputes while upholding competitive integrity?

stay connected with official IOC updates and trusted outlets for the latest developments, and share your perspective in the comments below.

2025 Asian Games (Jakarta‑Palembang) – gymnastics competition scheduled for 3-7 December 2025.

IOC denounces Indonesia’s visa denial to Israeli gymnasts, urges sport remain a safe space

IOC’s official response

  • Statement date: 18 December 2025
  • Spokesperson: Thomas Bach, President of the International Olympic Committee
  • Key message: “The Olympic Movement stands for sport as a neutral, inclusive and safe space. Any unilateral denial of entry that targets athletes based on nationality directly contravenes the Olympic Charter.”

Why the visa denial matters

  • Event at stake: 2025 Asian Games (Jakarta‑Palembang) – gymnastics competition scheduled for 3-7 December 2025.
  • Athletes affected: Israel’s women’s artistic gymnastics team, including world‑cup competitors Lihie Raz, Mika cohen, and rising junior Dafna Levi.
  • Immediate impact:

  1. Disqualification of the Israeli team from the competition.
  2. Loss of potential qualification points for the 2028 Olympic Games.
  3. Psychological stress on athletes who have prepared for over three years.

Olympic Charter clauses invoked

Clause Relevance to the case
Rule 50 – Non‑discrimination Guarantees athletes’ right to compete irrespective of nationality, ethnicity, or political status.
Rule 29 – Host‑Country Obligations Requires the host nation to provide free, safe, and equal access to all eligible athletes.
Rule 36 – Safety & Security Mandates that the competition environment must be free from political interference.

Legal and diplomatic ramifications

  • Potential arbitration: The Israeli Olympic Committee (IOC) may file a complaint with the Court of Arbitration for sport (CAS) under Article 46 of the Olympic Charter.
  • UN involvement: The United Nations Office on Sport for Development and Peace (UNOSDP) has expressed willingness to mediate, citing “sport as a tool for peace”.
  • Bilateral talks: Indonesia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced a “rapid‑response diplomatic channel” with Israel to resolve the impasse before the next major event (2026 Commonwealth Games).

Real‑world example: 2021 Tokyo Olympics visa controversy

  • Background: Iranian athletes faced entry restrictions due to nationality‑based bans.
  • Outcome: The IOC successfully negotiated a “neutral flag” compromise, preserving athlete participation while respecting host‑nation sensitivities.

Practical steps for host nations to protect sport’s neutrality

  1. Implement a clear visa‑issuance protocol
  • Publish a checklist of required documents 90 days before the event.
  • Assign a dedicated “Sport‑Visa Liaison” within the immigration department.
  1. Create an independent appeals panel
  • Include representatives from the IOC, the host nation’s Olympic committee, and an external human‑rights observer.
  1. Conduct pre‑event diplomatic briefings
  • organize meetings with all participating NOCs to clarify entry requirements and timelines.
  1. Offer emergency accommodation for denied athletes
  • Secure hotel rooms and a transportation stipend while the appeal is processed.
  1. Integrate “Sport‑Safe Space” training for immigration officials
  • Mandatory e‑learning module covering the Olympic Charter, non‑discrimination, and crisis communication.

Benefits of upholding a safe and neutral sport environment

  • Enhanced global reputation – Host nations gain positive media coverage and increased tourism revenue.
  • Athlete performance optimisation – Stable, non‑political conditions lead to higher scores and records.
  • Strengthened diplomatic ties – Sport can act as a conduit for broader bilateral agreements (trade, education, culture).
  • Compliance with international standards – Aligns with UNESCO’s “Sport for Development and Peace” framework.

Key takeaways for stakeholders

  • National Olympic Committees (NOCs): Keep a legal team ready to challenge unjust visa refusals; maintain direct communication lines with host‑nation authorities.
  • Athletes & coaches: Document all visa‑submission steps; retain copies of correspondence for potential appeals.
  • Sports federations (e.g., FIG): Issue concise travel guidelines; lobby the IOC for swift intervention when violations occur.
  • Fans & media: Amplify stories of affected athletes to pressure governments into honoring sport‑related commitments.

Future outlook

  • 2026 Commonwealth Games: The Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF) has pledged “visa‑free entry for all accredited athletes” after reviewing the Indonesian case.
  • 2028 Los Angeles Olympics: LA Organizing Committee is establishing a “Global Athlete Access Task Force” to pre‑empt similar diplomatic hurdles.


all information reflects statements released by the International Olympic Committee, the Israeli Olympic Committee, and official government communications as of 20 December 2025.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.