“`html
Iran Criticizes “Appeasement” Policy Towards Israel at UN Conference on Palestine
Table of Contents
- 1. Iran Criticizes “Appeasement” Policy Towards Israel at UN Conference on Palestine
- 2. Frequently Asked Questions
- 3. What did Iran’s UN Ambassador criticize regarding Israel?
- 4. What specific actions of Israel were condemned?
- 5. Why has Israel not respected UN resolutions on Palestine?
- 6. What is Iran’s stance on Palestinian self-determination?
- 7. What immediate actions did the ambassador call for?
- 8. How do Iran’s proposed solutions address the internal divisions within Palestinian leadership?
- 9. Iran’s Ambassador Urges Establishment of an Independent Palestinian State
- 10. Iran’s Consistent Stance on Palestine
- 11. Key Arguments presented by Ambassador Iravani
- 12. Past Context: Iran’s relationship with Palestine
- 13. Regional Implications and Geopolitical considerations
- 14. Obstacles to a Palestinian State & Iran’s Proposed Solutions
- 15. The Role of International Actors
By Archyde Staff
Iran’s Ambassador too the United Nations, Iravani, has voiced strong criticism of what he termed an “appeasement” policy towards Israel.Speaking at a high-level international conference focused on the peaceful resolution of the Palestinian issue, Iravani argued that decades of concessions have emboldened Tel Aviv’s actions in Palestinian territories.
He condemned the ongoing occupation, illegal settlements, and severe human rights violations against Palestinians. Iravani specifically highlighted the destruction and mass killings in Gaza, as well as Israel’s attempts to annex parts of the West Bank.These actions, he stated, have not been deterred by international resolutions.
Iravani pointed out that Israel consistently disregards UN resolutions concerning Palestine. He attributed this lack of accountability to unwavering support from the United States, noting nearly fifty U.S. vetoes in the UN Security Council that have shielded Israel from consequence.
Reaffirming Iran’s commitment to the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination,iravani advocated for resistance against apartheid and foreign occupation. He stressed the importance of a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
The ambassador also called for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in Gaza. He further demanded unrestricted humanitarian access to the besieged territory.
Iravani emphasized that lasting peace must be built upon the genuine will of Palestine’s diverse population. This, he suggested, should be achieved through a free and comprehensive referendum.
He underscored the critical need for Palestine to be granted full UN membership. Additionally, Iravani called for holding Israel accountable for war crimes and its apartheid policies. He concluded by condemning any normalization of relations with Tel Aviv.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Iran’s UN Ambassador criticize regarding Israel?
Iran’s UN Ambassador, Iravani, criticized the policy of “appeasement” towards Israel, stating it has emboldened the country’s expansionist actions.
What specific actions of Israel were condemned?
Iravani condemned the ongoing occupation, illegal settlements, destruction and killings in Gaza, and Israel’s attempts to annex parts of the West Bank.
Why has Israel not respected UN resolutions on Palestine?
Iravani stated that Israel’s lack of accountability for ignoring UN resolutions is due to unwavering support from the U.S., including numerous vetoes in the UN Security Council.
What is Iran’s stance on Palestinian self-determination?
Iran reaffirms its steadfast support for the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and advocates for resistance against apartheid and foreign occupation.
What immediate actions did the ambassador call for?
iravani called for
How do Iran’s proposed solutions address the internal divisions within Palestinian leadership?
Iran’s Ambassador Urges Establishment of an Independent Palestinian State
Iran’s Consistent Stance on Palestine
Iran has long been a vocal supporter of the Palestinian cause, consistently advocating for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. Recent statements by Iran’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, reiterate this commitment, framing it as a crucial step towards regional stability and a just resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. this position isn’t new; it’s deeply rooted in Iran’s foreign policy and ideological principles.The core of Iran’s argument centers on the right to self-determination for the Palestinian people and the end of the ongoing occupation of Palestinian territories.
Key Arguments presented by Ambassador Iravani
Ambassador Iravani’s recent address to the UN Security Council highlighted several key points:
Two-State Solution: The ambassador firmly endorsed the two-state solution as the only viable path to peace,based on pre-1967 borders,with East Jerusalem as the capital of a Palestinian state. This aligns with numerous UN resolutions and international consensus.
Ending the Occupation: A central demand is the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from all occupied Palestinian territories, including the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem. Iran views the occupation as the primary obstacle to peace.
Right of Return: Iran supports the right of return for Palestinian refugees, as stipulated by UN Resolution 194. This remains a highly contentious issue in negotiations.
Condemnation of Settlement Expansion: The ambassador strongly condemned the continued expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, deeming them illegal under international law and a significant impediment to the peace process.
International Duty: Iravani called on the international community, particularly the United Nations, to fulfill its responsibility in ensuring the realization of the Palestinian people’s legitimate rights.
Past Context: Iran’s relationship with Palestine
Iran’s support for Palestine dates back to the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Following the revolution, iran severed ties with Israel and actively championed the Palestinian cause.
Early Support for the PLO: Iran provided significant support to the Palestine Liberation organization (PLO) under Yasser Arafat, offering financial and political backing.
Hamas and Islamic Jihad: In more recent years, Iran has cultivated closer ties with Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, providing them with support, though the extent of this support is frequently enough debated. This relationship has been a source of tension with some regional and international actors.
The Al-Quds Day: Iran annually observes Al-Quds Day (Jerusalem Day) on the last Friday of Ramadan, a presentation of solidarity with Palestinians and a call for the liberation of Jerusalem.
Regional Implications and Geopolitical considerations
Iran’s unwavering support for Palestine has significant regional implications.
Proxy Conflict: some analysts view Iran’s support for Palestinian groups as part of a broader proxy conflict with Israel and its allies.
Influence in the region: iran seeks to project itself as a leader in the Muslim world, and its stance on Palestine enhances its influence among certain segments of the Arab and Muslim population.
Normalization efforts: Iran views the recent normalization of relations between Israel and some Arab states (Abraham Accords) as a betrayal of the Palestinian cause and a threat to regional stability.
Potential for Escalation: The current situation, coupled with the recent deployment of B-2 bombers near the region (as reported by JForum.fr), raises concerns about potential escalation and the risk of a wider conflict. The presence of these strategic assets underscores the heightened tensions and the potential for military intervention.
Obstacles to a Palestinian State & Iran’s Proposed Solutions
Despite Iran’s advocacy, numerous obstacles remain in the path of establishing an independent Palestinian state. These include:
- Israeli Security Concerns: Israel cites security concerns as a major impediment to withdrawing from the West Bank and allowing a fully sovereign Palestinian state.
- Internal Palestinian Divisions: The political divide between Fatah and Hamas weakens the Palestinian negotiating position and hinders the formation of a unified government.
- Settlement Expansion: Continued Israeli settlement expansion makes a contiguous Palestinian state increasingly arduous to achieve.
- Jerusalem’s Status: The status of Jerusalem remains a highly sensitive issue, with both Israelis and Palestinians claiming the city as their capital.
Iran proposes several solutions to overcome these obstacles:
International Guarantees: Iran calls for international guarantees to ensure the security of both Israel and Palestine.
UN-Monitored Referendum: A UN-monitored referendum to determine the final status of Jerusalem.
Inclusive Negotiations: Inclusive negotiations involving all Palestinian factions and regional stakeholders.
Pressure on Israel: Increased international pressure on Israel to end the occupation and comply with international law.
The Role of International Actors
The international community plays a crucial role in facilitating
