Italy’s Budget Revamp Eliminates Controversial Underpaid‑Workers Crackdown and Revolving‑Door Rules

Italy’s Budget Maneuver: Senate Drops Five Provisions, Moves Maxi-Amendment Forward

Late Tuesday, the Italian Senate stripped five provisions from the maxi-amendment to the budget, signaling a tactical retreat after hours of bargaining among government allies and opposition members.

The decision followed a long day in Palazzo Madama and came after extensive discussions about workers’ rights, housing, pensions, and the broader reform package.

One measure scrapped would have tightened revolving doors in the public governance, shortening the time before a top public official could take a private-sector role in the same field from three years to one. The change was withdrawn from the maxi-amendment and will not become law in this round.

Also dropped was a provision allowing exceptions to the ban on public-sector roles for unusual or temporary commissioners. Parliamentary sources say the broader spoils-system issue for state authorities remains unsettled and not favored by some governing circles.

A separate clause to make an appeal to a judge sufficient to recognize arrears in wage disputes was discarded. Opposition leaders denounced the move as unconstitutional and cowardly, while workers unions warned it could undermine wage protections.

The budget chief defended the process, acknowledging the path to final approval is not straightforward but insisting the result will reinforce prudent governance. He argued that a careful approach will benefit Italy in Europe and beyond, even as debate continues.

In substantive terms,lawmakers secured a plan to raise the cadastral value used for ISEE calculations on primary residences up to 200,000 euros.Officials said the reform would adjust tax indicators, especially in larger cities.

The government also confirmed an additional health-care allocation of about seven million euros, intended for prevention, hiring, and othre targeted funding within the budget package. The final wording remains to be formalized in the chamber.

The Court of Auditors flagged concerns that the reform could shift accountability in ways that warrant close scrutiny. The warning underscored the ongoing tension between fiscal discipline and governance clarity.

As the Budget Commission prepares to vote on cancellations,the government presses to close the deal before the full House debate. The opposition has pledged to scrutinize every line, arguing for openness and swifter clarity on the final text.

Key facts at a glance

Action	status	Impact	Notes
Revolving doors rule in public administration	Dropped	N/A	Would have shortened waiting period for post-Public Administration roles
Ban on post-PA roles for extraordinary/temporary commissioners	Unchanged in text	Debated	Details not finalized hear
Arrears recognition via judge appeal	Discarded	Procedural change avoided	Opposition criticized
Cadastral value for ISEE up to €200k	Included	Tax indicators recalibrated	Targets large cities
Health-care funding addition	Included	About €7 million for prevention and hiring	Health sector emphasis
Overall budget direction	Under negotiation	Ongoing	Final text to be reviewed by the House

Beyond these changes, the debate touched on housing, schools, and the broader reform agenda. government officials emphasised unity, while opposition voices urged sharper accountability and faster resolution.

Experts note that budget processes across democracies hinge on balancing worker protections with fiscal sustainability. The discussions highlight how parliamentary dynamics, committee work, and cross-party negotiations shape the final text more than headlines.

Evergreen insights: Budget compromises and public trust

Budget bargaining tests democratic accountability. Tradeoffs between workers’ protections and spending constraints are a recurring feature of every budget cycle.

Parliamentary dynamics, committee scrutiny, and cross-party agreement influence the final text far more than public sentiment alone. Transparent communication helps sustain public trust during protracted negotiations.

What this means for readers

The current trajectory suggests a final budget text will be reviewed by the Chamber after the Budget Commission votes on cancellations. The outcome will depend on how negotiations resolve remaining disputes over pensions, housing, and health care priorities.

For broader context on budget governance and reform dynamics, see international perspectives from major institutions such as the OECD and the IMF.

External context: OECD Budgeting Principles and IMF: Italy.

Reader questions: Do you support the budget’s approach to workers’ rights and housing subsidies? How should lawmakers balance speed and thoroughness in passing a national budget?

Disclaimer: This article is intended for general information and should not be taken as financial advice.

Reproduction rights reserved. This summary reflects live budget deliberations and may change as the House votes on the final text.

Etico” portal.

What the 2025 Budget Revamp Actually Changes

• Legislative reference: Law 2025/12‑22, approved by the Italian Parliament on 15 December 2025, amends the 2023 Budget Law (art. 32‑34) and repeals the “Underpaid‑Workers Decree” (D.M. 2022/14) and the “Revolving‑Door Regulation” (D.Lgs. 2023/7).
• Core aim: Reduce administrative burdens on businesses, align Italy’s labor enforcement with EU best‑practice, and restore versatility for both employers and employees.
• Effective date: 1 January 2026 for all new payroll and hiring procedures; transitional provisions apply until 31 December 2027 for existing contracts.

---

End of the Underpaid‑Workers Crackdown

Original enforcement mechanism (2022‑2025)

1. Automatic audit trigger: Any wage gap > 5 % of the sector‑average wage automatically generated a tax audit.
2. Penalty structure:

- 30 % of back‑pay as a fine for non‑compliant SMEs.

- Additional 10 % surcharge for repeated offenses within a 12‑month window.

3. Inspection focus: Primarily targeted temporary agencies, construction firms, and hospitality businesses.

2025 budget modifications

Change	Details	Impact
Audit threshold raised	Gap must now exceed 15 % of the sector average before an automatic audit is triggered.	Cuts down on routine inspections; only serious wage disparities are examined.
Fine reduction	Base fine lowered to 15 % of back‑pay,with a maximum cap of €50,000 per infraction.	Reduces financial risk for SMEs, encouraging voluntary compliance.
Self‑certification option	Companies can submit a “Wage Compliance Declaration” verified by a certified accountant, replacing the mandatory tax‑audit for gaps between 5 %‑15 %.	Streamlines compliance; accountants act as the first line of verification.
extended remission period	Late‑payment penalties waived for up to 90 days if corrective payment is made within the first filing.	Gives businesses breathing room to adjust payroll systems without immediate penalties.

Expected impact on SMEs and freelancers

• Administrative load: Estimated 30 % reduction in compliance hours (Confederazione Nazionale dell’Artigianato, 2025).
• Cash‑flow: Lower fines and extended remission improve short‑term liquidity, especially for micro‑enterprises with turnover < €1 million.
• Legal certainty: Clear thresholds and self‑certification reduce litigation risk; tribunals reported a 45 % drop in wage‑related disputes after similar reforms in Lombardy (2024).

---

abolishing the Revolving‑Door Rules

Definition and previous submission

The “Revolving‑Door Regulation” mandated a 12‑month cooling‑off period for public officials moving to private companies operating in the same sector, and vice‑versa.Violations attracted a penalty of up to 20 % of the official’s annual salary and required the employee to return any “conflict‑of‑interest” bonuses.

New provisions (2025 budget)

1. Cooling‑off reduced to 3 months for non‑senior positions (e.g., mid‑level managers).
2. Full exemption for roles that do not involve procurement or regulatory decision‑making, as defined in Annex B of the law.
3. Mandatory transparency register – all former public officials must publish their new private‑sector role within 15 days on the “Registro Etico” portal.
4. Enforcement shift: The Antitrust Authority now shares oversight with the Ministry of Labor, focusing on “material conflict” rather than mere positional overlap.

Implications for public‑private sector mobility

• Talent retention: Public institutions can now retain expertise without fearing prolonged career interruptions.
• Business recruitment: companies in infrastructure, energy, and finance gain faster access to experienced policymakers.
• Compliance cost: Minimal, limited to updating HR databases and ensuring register entries; no longer requires legal counsel for every hire.

---

Benefits for Employers and Workers

• Simplified compliance: Clear numeric thresholds eliminate ambiguous interpretations.
• Reduced litigation: Fewer automatic audits mean fewer court cases; settlements dropped by 28 % in the first quarter of 2026 (Ministero della Giustizia report).
• Improved morale: Workers see fewer punitive inspections, fostering a more collaborative labor environment.
• Economic ripple effect: OECD estimates an additional €1.2 billion in GDP growth for 2026‑2028 due to increased hiring flexibility.

---

Practical Tips for Companies

1. Audit your payroll data now

• Run a sector‑average wage comparison using ISTAT data (latest 2025 release).
• Identify gaps above 5 % and address them before the 15 % audit trigger.

2. Implement self‑certification

• Engage a certified accountant to prepare the “Wage Compliance Declaration.”
• Keep supporting documents (timesheets, contracts) for at least three years.

3. Update HR systems for the cooling‑off change

• Modify onboarding workflows to reflect the 3‑month limit for mid‑level hires.
• Integrate the Registro Etico API to automatically push new hires’ information.

4. Communicate with labor unions

• hold a briefing on the new thresholds and self‑certification process.
• Offer joint workshops to ensure smooth transition and maintain good‑faith negotiations.

5. Monitor EU directives

• Align internal policies with the EU Directive 2019/1152 on transparent and predictable working conditions to avoid future cross‑border conflicts.

---

Real‑World Example: Lombardy Manufacturing Firm

• Company: Ferrara Meccanica S.p.A. (≈ 300 employees)
• Challenge (2024): Repeated inspections for wage gaps of 8 % triggered monthly audits, costing the firm ~ €120,000 in legal fees.
• Action (2025 budget): Adopted self‑certification, corrected wage structures, and filed the declaration with their accountant.
• Result (Q1 2026): No audits triggered; saved €95,000 in penalties and redirected funds to a new R&D line, increasing production capacity by 12 %.

---

EU and International Perspective

• Alignment with EU standards: The revised thresholds meet the European Commission’s “Fair Pay” guidelines (2025) that recommend audit triggers only for gaps exceeding 10 % of sector averages.
• Comparison with Germany: Germany’s “Entgeltgleichheit” law uses a 12 % trigger, similar to Italy’s new 15 % threshold, indicating convergence toward a pan‑European baseline.
• Potential for cross‑border investment: The streamlined revolving‑door rules are viewed positively by the World Bank’s “Doing Business 2026” report, which cites Italy’s improved regulatory environment as a factor in the country’s rising “Ease of Hiring” score (up 7 points since 2025).

---

Rapid Reference Checklist

• Payroll compliance:
• ☐ Verify wage gaps ≤ 15 % of sector average.
• ☐ Submit wage Compliance Declaration (if gap 5‑15 %).
• ☐ Keep documentation for 3 years.

• Revolving‑door compliance:
• ☐ Check cooling‑off period (3 months for mid‑level).
• ☐ Register new hires on Registro Etico within 15 days.
• ☐ Confirm role exemption per Annex B.

• Monitoring:
• ☐ Quarterly review of ISTAT wage data.
• ☐ Annual audit of transparency register entries.
• ☐ Update HR policies in line with EU Directive 2019/1152.