Los Angeles’s Art World: From Balkanized Beginnings to a $2 Billion Future
Los Angeles is betting big on art – to the tune of $2 billion in new museum infrastructure alone. But this isn’t a sudden impulse. It’s the culmination of a decades-long transformation, a story of talent, investment, and a uniquely L.A. spirit of reinvention. The city’s rise as a global art hub offers crucial lessons for other urban centers seeking to cultivate creative economies, and signals a potential shift in how we experience and critique art itself.
The Unlikely Rise of an Art Capital
For decades, Los Angeles’s art scene was fragmented, a collection of smaller communities rather than a unified force. As a journalist starting out in 1980, the idea of L.A. rivaling New York as an art capital seemed improbable. But a confluence of factors began to change that. The first, and arguably most important, was the sheer explosion of artistic talent. Artists, particularly those graduating from institutions like CalArts, began choosing to stay in Los Angeles, drawn by affordability and a sense of creative freedom. Mike Kelley, a pivotal figure, exemplified this trend, and his decision to remain in L.A. had a ripple effect, attracting others and establishing the city as a legitimate artistic home.
The Getty Effect: Media Attention and Cultural Legitimacy
However, talent alone wasn’t enough. The turning point came in 1982 with the announcement of J. Paul Getty’s $1.2 billion bequest to his museum. This wasn’t just about the money; it was about the attention. Suddenly, Los Angeles wasn’t just known for Hollywood; it was a city with a significant art institution and a story to tell. International media shifted its focus, and for the first time, art culture in L.A. received sustained global coverage. This media fascination proved to be a catalyst, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of interest and investment. You can see a similar dynamic at play today with the increasing focus on art and culture in cities like Miami and Dubai.
MOCA and the Power of Institutional Vision
The establishment of the Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCA) in 1983 further solidified L.A.’s position. MOCA wasn’t just another museum; it was a bold statement, an institution dedicated to presenting and interpreting the art of our time. Its innovative approach, exemplified by the “Temporary Contemporary” space, became a model for museums worldwide. MOCA demonstrated the power of institutional vision in shaping a cultural landscape.
The Future of Art and Criticism in a Digital Age
Today, Los Angeles stands firmly among the world’s most important art centers. But the landscape is changing, and the challenges are evolving. The upcoming openings of the Geffen Galleries at LACMA and the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art represent a massive investment in infrastructure, but also raise questions about programming and artistic direction. The Lucas Museum, in particular, risks blurring the lines between art and popular culture, a debate that highlights a broader tension within the art world.
The Crisis in Publishing, Not Criticism
Perhaps the most pressing challenge isn’t about the art itself, but about how it’s discussed and understood. The traditional model of art criticism, as embodied by decades of staff critics at newspapers like The Times, is under threat. The digital revolution has fragmented media, replacing in-depth analysis with fleeting snippets and “thumbs up” reactions. However, as the experience of Charles Baudelaire demonstrates, journalistic criticism has always been vital. The real crisis isn’t a lack of critical thought, but a shrinking platform for thoughtful discourse. This shift necessitates new models for art criticism – perhaps more independent voices, online platforms, and collaborative initiatives.
The Rise of Experiential Art and the Need for Nuance
The future of art may also be increasingly experiential, blurring the boundaries between creator and audience. This trend demands a more nuanced form of criticism, one that can grapple with the complexities of immersive installations, performance art, and digital media. Artnews recently explored this very topic, highlighting the need for critics to adapt to a rapidly changing landscape.
Los Angeles’s journey from a fragmented art scene to a global powerhouse offers valuable lessons. It demonstrates the importance of fostering local talent, leveraging institutional investment, and embracing a spirit of innovation. But it also underscores the critical need to preserve and nurture the art of criticism, ensuring that we continue to have informed and insightful conversations about the art that shapes our world. What will the next chapter hold for L.A.’s art scene, and how will we ensure that its story continues to be told with depth and nuance?
Share your thoughts on the future of art and criticism in the comments below!
