Leh Apex Body Ceases Dialogue with Delhi Over Lack of Peace Restoration

September 29, 2025

Leh, Ladakh – Talks between representatives of Ladakh and the Indian Union Government have hit a snag, as the Leh Apex Body (LAB) announced it’s withdrawal from scheduled negotiations. The decision, revealed today at a press conference in Leh, casts doubt on efforts to resolve ongoing tensions in the strategically notable region.

Negotiations Suspended Due to Current Climate

Thupstan chhewang, Chairman of the LAB, confirmed that the organization will not participate in the High-Powered Committee meeting slated for the 6th of October, nor in preparatory discussions scheduled for September 27th and 28th in New Delhi. This move is a direct response to the existing curfew and volatile security situation within ladakh, with Chhewang expressing concern that proceeding with talks under such conditions would appear insensitive.

Chhewang has formally requested Lieutenant Governor Kavinder Gupta to promptly lift the restrictions, undertake a thorough review of the security landscape, and facilitate the respectful cremation of individuals who lost their lives during recent unrest.

Roots of the Dispute: A History of Unfulfilled Promises

The LAB’s decision stems from a growing sense of disillusionment following the reorganization of Jammu and Kashmir in 2019, which created Ladakh as a separate Union Territory. According to Chhewang, the promise of greater autonomy and protection of Ladakhi rights has not materialized.He stated that the transition occurred without accompanying legislation to secure thes rights, effectively diminishing the safeguards previously afforded under Article 370.

The organization has consistently advocated for a four-point agenda, encompassing full statehood for Ladakh, protections under the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution – mirroring provisions for tribal areas in other states – and increased empowerment of the Hill Councils in Leh and Kargil. The recent use of force by authorities,resulting in fatalities,has deepened the sense of grievance and distrust.

Strategic Implications and Regional Stability

The withdrawal of the LAB from negotiations represents a significant setback for the central government’s efforts to stabilize the region. Ladakh’s location bordering Pakistan and China makes it a crucial strategic area. Prolonged unrest risks exacerbating existing geopolitical tensions.The government had initiated dialog in the immediate aftermath of the recent violence, aiming to de-escalate the situation, but this latest growth threatens to prolong uncertainty.

Here’s a fast overview of the key demands:

Demand	Description
Statehood	Full restoration of Statehood to Ladakh.
Sixth Schedule	Inclusion under the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, granting greater autonomy.
Hill Council Empowerment	Increased powers and budgetary allocations for the leh and Kargil Hill Councils.
Justice for Victims	Accountability for alleged excessive force used during protests and support for the families of those who died.

Did You Know? Ladakh, often called “Little Tibet”, is a high-altitude desert region known for its stunning landscapes and unique Buddhist culture.

Pro tip: Understanding the historical context of Article 370 is crucial to grasping the concerns of the Ladakhi people.

Ladakh: A Region in Transition

The creation of Ladakh as a Union Territory in 2019 was intended to provide greater administrative efficiency and development opportunities. However, it has also sparked concerns about the dilution of local identity and autonomy. The demands for statehood and Sixth Schedule protections reflect a broader pattern observed in other tribal areas of India, where communities seek greater control over their land, resources, and cultural heritage.

The ongoing situation highlights the complexities of governance in border regions and the importance of inclusive dialogue. The Indian government faces the challenge of balancing national security interests with the aspirations of local communities.

Learn more about Ladakh from the Ministry of External Affairs.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Ladakh Dispute

• What is the primary demand of the Leh Apex Body? the LAB is primarily demanding full statehood for Ladakh, along with protections under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution and greater empowerment of local Hill Councils.
• Why is Ladakh strategically vital to India? Ladakh is strategically important due to its location bordering Pakistan and China, serving as a crucial region for national security.
• what was the impact of the abrogation of Article 370 on Ladakh? The abrogation of Article 370 led to concerns among Ladakhis that their special rights and protections would be eroded.
• What is the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution? The Sixth Schedule provides for the governance of tribal areas in certain states,granting them a degree of autonomy.
• What is the current status of negotiations between the LAB and the government? Negotiations are currently stalled, with the LAB withdrawing from scheduled talks due to ongoing unrest and unfulfilled promises.
• What measures has the LAB requested from the Lieutenant Governor? The LAB has requested the lifting of restrictions,a review of the security situation,and facilitation of the cremation of victims.

What are your thoughts on the future of Ladakh? Share your opinions in the comments below and help us continue the conversation!

What are the potential consequences of the LAB’s decision to cease dialog with the central government?

Breakdown of the Dialogue Suspension

On September 29, 2025, the Leh Apex Body (LAB), a coalition of political and social organizations in Ladakh, officially announced the cessation of dialogue with the central government in Delhi. This significant development stems from what the LAB describes as a consistent failure to address core demands related to the restoration of peace and security in the region, notably following the revocation of Article 370 and the creation of the Union Territory of Ladakh in 2019. The primary concerns revolve around:

* Sixth Schedule Implementation: The LAB has been persistently demanding the inclusion of Ladakh under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution. This would grant greater autonomy to tribal areas, protecting their land, culture, and resources.

* Full Statehood: A key demand is the restoration of statehood for Ladakh, arguing that Union Territory status has diminished local portrayal and decision-making power.

* Job Security & employment: concerns over employment opportunities for local residents, particularly in the face of increased competition from outside the region, remain unresolved.

* Land Protection Laws: The LAB seeks robust land protection laws to prevent the sale of land to outsiders, safeguarding the demographic and cultural identity of Ladakh.

* parliamentary Representation: Demands for two parliamentary seats for Ladakh, ensuring adequate representation in the national legislature.

Timeline of Negotiations & growing Frustration

The dialogue between the LAB and the central government, facilitated by various intermediaries, began in early 2024. Initial meetings were described as “positive” and “constructive,” with both sides expressing a willingness to find a mutually acceptable solution. However, progress stalled in recent months, with the LAB alleging a lack of concrete action from Delhi.

Here’s a brief timeline:

1. February 2024: First round of talks initiated, focusing on the Sixth Schedule demand.
2. May 2024: A high-level delegation from the LAB met with Union Ministers in Delhi.
3. July 2024: LAB expressed disappointment over the lack of a clear roadmap for addressing their concerns.
4. September 2025: Official announcement of the suspension of dialogue.

The LAB’s statement emphasized that repeated assurances from the government had not translated into tangible outcomes, leading to a growing sense of disillusionment among the people of Ladakh. The lack of progress on crucial issues like land rights and employment has fueled anxieties about the future of the region.

Impact on Regional Security & Political Landscape

The suspension of dialogue raises concerns about the potential for increased unrest in Ladakh. The region has remained relatively peaceful as the creation of the Union Territory,but underlying tensions persist. The LAB’s decision could embolden other groups advocating for greater autonomy or a return to the pre-2019 status quo.

* Increased Protests: Analysts predict a surge in protests and demonstrations across Ladakh.

* Political Realignment: The situation could lead to a realignment of political forces in the region, with potentially new alliances emerging.

* Security Implications: The central government will likely increase security presence in Ladakh to prevent any escalation of tensions.

* Impact on Development: The suspension of dialogue could hinder development projects and investment in the region.

Perspectives from Delhi: Government Response

The central government has responded to the LAB’s decision with a call for continued dialogue, reiterating its commitment to the development and well-being of Ladakh. Government sources maintain that several proposals have been offered to address the concerns raised by the LAB, but these have not been fully accepted. They emphasize the need for a pragmatic approach and a willingness to compromise from both sides. The Ministry of Home Affairs has stated that channels of communication remain open and that it is indeed hopeful that the dialogue will resume soon.

The Role of Civil Society & local Voices

Civil society organizations and local leaders in Ladakh have largely supported the LAB’s decision, expressing solidarity with their demands. many residents feel that their concerns have been ignored by Delhi for too long. The suspension of dialogue is seen as a necessary step to pressure the government to take their grievances seriously. Local voices emphasize the importance of preserving Ladakh’s unique cultural identity and ensuring that the benefits of development are shared equitably among all residents. The future of Ladakh hinges on a genuine and meaningful dialogue that addresses the legitimate aspirations of its people.

Understanding the Sixth Schedule & its Relevance to Ladakh

The Sixth