The Slow Erosion of Life in Occupied Ukraine: A Glimpse into a Future of Forced Assimilation
A third of the population gone. Bartering for vegetables. Pensions accessed through VPNs. These aren’t relics of a distant past, but the daily realities for residents of occupied eastern Ukraine, as revealed in the story of Oksana, a resident of Novoaidar. But beyond the immediate hardship, Oksana’s experience offers a chilling preview of a broader strategy: the systematic dismantling of Ukrainian identity and the forced integration of occupied territories into Russia, not through economic prosperity, but through a slow, grinding erosion of life as it was known.
The Economic Strangulation of Resistance
Before the full-scale invasion in 2022, Novoaidar, like many towns in the Luhansk region, functioned within the Ukrainian economic system. Oksana’s ability to sell homegrown produce provided a modest but vital income. Now, that’s gone. The requirement to register a business under Russian law isn’t about fostering entrepreneurship; it’s about control. It’s a barrier designed to stifle independent economic activity and force reliance on the occupying authorities. This isn’t an isolated case. Across occupied territories, similar restrictions are being imposed, effectively creating a two-tiered system where those who comply are marginally better off, and those who resist face economic ruin.
The stark income disparity – villagers earning less than €200 while construction workers can earn over €1,300 – highlights a deliberate strategy. The limited job market, heavily skewed towards service and construction, coupled with the lure of high-paying contracts with the Russian army (over €2,300), is designed to incentivize collaboration and funnel young men into the Russian war effort. This isn’t economic development; it’s a calculated attempt to reshape the demographic and political landscape.
The Weaponization of Basic Services
The stories of power outages, water shortages, and unreliable internet access aren’t simply the consequences of war. They are tools of control. As Oleksii Kharchenko, the governor of the Luhansk region, points out, these disruptions are often presented as “repairs” or “maintenance,” masking a deliberate strategy to destabilize life and increase dependence on the occupying forces. The poor cellphone reception and blocked websites further isolate the population, limiting access to information and hindering communication with the outside world. The reliance on VPNs to access even basic services like Ukrainian pensions underscores the extent of this digital siege.
The Ukrainian pension lifeline, accessed through clandestine means, is a poignant example of resistance and resilience. But even this is under threat. The impending deadline for Russian citizenship – by September 10th, those without it will be considered foreigners – is a blatant attempt to sever ties with Ukraine and force assimilation. Denial of social security, healthcare, and basic rights is a powerful incentive, but it comes at a steep price: potential conscription into the Russian army.
The Confiscation of Identity and Property
The confiscation of property from those who have fled is perhaps the most alarming development. Under the guise of Russian law, homes are being declared “ownerless” and transferred to communal ownership. This isn’t about addressing housing shortages; it’s about erasing the past and solidifying Russian control. Oksana’s decision to obtain Russian papers for her house, despite her desire to remain Ukrainian, is a heartbreaking illustration of the impossible choices facing residents. This tactic, combined with the pressure to adopt Russian citizenship, represents a systematic attempt to dismantle Ukrainian identity at the individual and collective level.
The situation in occupied Ukraine is a stark warning about the long-term consequences of forced occupation. It’s a case study in how economic pressure, the weaponization of basic services, and the manipulation of legal frameworks can be used to erode a culture and assimilate a population. The rebuilding of cities like Lysychansk, as portrayed on Russian television, is a facade masking the continued devastation and the ongoing struggle for survival.
Looking Ahead: A Future of Resistance and Resilience
While the situation is dire, the resilience of people like Oksana offers a glimmer of hope. Her determination to stay, to maintain a semblance of normalcy, and to wait for “things to be like before” reflects a deep-seated commitment to her identity and her homeland. The development of tools like the Telegram chatbot for communication with occupied territories, as mentioned by Kharchenko, demonstrates a commitment from Kyiv to maintain a connection with its citizens. However, the long-term success of this resistance will depend on sustained international support and a continued focus on documenting and exposing the human rights abuses taking place in occupied Ukraine. The future of these territories hangs in the balance, and the choices made today will determine whether they become fully integrated into Russia or remain a beacon of Ukrainian identity.
What strategies do you believe are most effective in supporting populations living under occupation? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
