The Anti-Terrorism Court of Lahore gave a reserved verdict on the bail applications of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder chairman Imran Khan in 8 cases on May 9.
The anti-terrorism court in Lahore rejected the bails of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder in the Jinnah House attack and May 9 eight cases. Judge Manzar Ali Gul gave a reserved verdict on the bails.
Anti-Terrorism Court Judge Manzar Ali Gul heard former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s bail pleas in 8 cases on May 9. Founding Chairman PTI’s lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar appeared in the court.
Founder PTI had filed bails in the Jinnah House attack, Shadman police station arson cases and the burning of police vehicles at Rahat Bakery Chowk and Zaman Park. Apart from this, founder PTI also filed bails in the Askari Tower attack and three other May 9 cases, which were rejected by the court.
Report of the hearing
Barrister Salman Safdar while arguing in the court said that the wrong reaction to the opinion of PTI founder came from the people. I have represented founder PTI in more than 240 cases. All kinds of cases were registered against one accused. There is no section under which a case has not been registered. Cypher’s case went to the Supreme Court, all others got relief from subordinate courts.
The lawyer said that in 30 cases decisions have been made against the government. I am placing before you about 25 decisions. The plaintiffs in each case are policemen. The government has thrown googly, leg break, off break second third. Sometimes they say that the conspiracy took place in this way, then they say that it did not take place in this way. Bushra Bibi was included in 12 cases that she was also involved in the conspiracy. It is easy to accuse and difficult to prove.
Barrister Salman Safdar said that I am not asking you for discharge or dismissal of the case. You cannot even provide these facilities. The accused has been in jail for a long time, I am asking the court for bail.
The lawyer argued that Pervez Musharraf’s medical records were presented, he had to leave the world to prove them true. After that everyone was convinced that all the medicals were correct. Judges have relayed that PTI founder was in NAB custody from 9 to 12 May.
Later, Special Prosecutor Rao Abdul Jabbar said in his arguments that all the cases are of rebellion against the government and attack on sensitive installations. The judgments presented are not related to these cases. According to British law, the King is not impeachable. The accused is not a king. At the behest of the accused, 200 installations were attacked. It was said on social media that today is the day of real jihad. Indian TV channels also continued to run the same news.
The prosecutor added in the arguments that the general public is prohibited from visiting certain places in Kent. Everyone has a modern device that communicates location and messages. How PC Hotel, Awari Hotel or milk shop in Anarkali was not attacked. Military installations were attacked. The statue of Colonel Sher Khan Shaheed, who sacrificed his life for the safety of the country, was kicked. These wars and attacks continue even today. The ranger and the policeman were martyred, while the accused says that I am in jail.
While giving arguments in the court on behalf of the prosecution, it was further said that the accused was not in jail on May 7 when the conspiracy took place, the application of the accused should be dismissed.
Later, the court reserved its judgment after completing the arguments on the bail pleas of the prosecution and the accused’s counsel.
#Major #verdict #Imran #Khans #bail #pleas #cases #Pakistan
What specific incidents from May 9th led to the filing of these eight terrorism cases against Imran Khan?
## Interview with Legal Analyst on Imran Khan’s Bail Rejection
**Host:** This week, former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s hopes for bail in 8 cases related to the May 9th protests were dashed by an Anti-Terrorism Court in Lahore. Joining us today is legal analyst, Alex Reed, to break down the implications of this decision.
Welcome to the show.
**Alex Reed:** Thank you for having me.
**Host:** Let’s start with the basics. What were the specific charges against Mr. Khan in these 8 cases?
**Alex Reed:** The charges stem from the violent protests that erupted across Pakistan on May 9th following Mr. Khan’s arrest. These cases primarily relate to the attacks on Jinnah House, arson incidents at Shadman police station, and the burning of police vehicles at Rahat Bakery Chowk and Zaman Park.
**Host:** Mr. Khan’s lawyer, Barrister Salman Safdar, argued passionately for his release. What were the key points of his defense?
**Alex Reed:** Barrister Safdar argued that the public’s reaction to Mr. Khan’s arrest was a spontaneous response to perceived injustice. He highlighted the sheer number of cases filed against Mr. Khan, suggesting a coordinated effort by the government to silence him.
He also emphasized that Mr. Khan had received relief in numerous other cases and pointed to discrepancies in the government’s narrative surrounding the May 9th events.
**Host:** Despite these arguments, the court ultimately denied the bail applications. How significant is this decision for Mr. Khan’s political future?
**Alex Reed:** This is a major setback for Mr. Khan.
Being denied bail in these high-profile cases will keep him incarcerated for the foreseeable future, potentially hampering his ability to lead his party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, and participate in upcoming elections.
**Host:** Do you anticipate any further legal challenges from Mr. Khan’s team?
**Alex Reed:** It’s highly likely that they will appeal this decision. They are determined to secure Mr. Khan’s release and will explore all legal avenues available to them.
**Host:** This case continues to be closely watched both within Pakistan and internationally. Thank you for providing your expertise on this complex situation, Alex Reed.
**Alex Reed:** It was my pleasure.
