2023-05-04 02:30:00
While this Wednesday, May 3, a new hearing for the impeachment of the Supreme Court of Justice, the former general administrator of the Court, Héctor Daniel Marchiwhose testimony was key last week in the Commission, gave a statement before the court of Ariel Lijo for a criminal case opened for that reason. In his witness statement, the accountant close to Ricardo Lorenzetti He reiterated his accusations and remarked that “the mere fact that they transferred me immediately following my reports on irregularities in Obra Social is clear proof of the connection between the two events.”
Marchi, recently removed from his position by the vote of the other three judges (a maneuver that he described as a “covert sanction” for a critical report that he had delivered in which he uncovered a series of mischief in the social work, whose responsibility he attributed to Juan Carlos Maqueda), did not appear -with prior notice- to testify this Wednesday as scheduled, and will once more be called as a witness for Tuesday of next week.
In his testimonial statement , the former official claimed to be “A victim” and once more aimed at Maqueda.
“It is strange that with 150 billion reserves and 0 pesos of debt and having incorporated state-of-the-art technology to the General Secretariat of Administration, which I informed the ministers a few days before, they have transferred me without notifying me,” he declared.
“The mere fact that I am transferred immediately following my reports on irregularities in the Social Work It is clear proof of the connection between the two events,” said Marchi.
“I do not have any grudges or animosity once morest the judges of the Court, but the guidelines that have guided my work during all these years, and that were a commitment on my part with the then seven ministers of the Court who honored me with the appointment, do not I will never stop complying with them,” added the witness.
“I have reported very serious irregularities of the Obra Social in the Hearing before the Political Judgment Commission of the Chamber of Deputies and I reported certain pressures that officials close to me had suffered, for which I comply with leaving it settled in this court,” he graphed. .
In turn, Marchi stressed that the Court had ordered a audit supported by its supervision report.
“In it, very serious irregularities in the Obra Social were denounced. Even the notes of the Obra Social itself give an account of these irregularities. Therefore it is objective, accounting and proven information. It is not a mere statement. All the supervision reports, recommendations and the final work report, and the working papers that include more than 18,000 pages, were delivered to the presidency of the Court for referral to the Political Judgment Commission,” said the accountant close to Lorenzetti. .
“Shared Dreams”: Cassation annulled three dismissals and they will investigate Schoklender’s relatives once more
Statements by Marchi on Juan Carlos Maqueda and Silvio Robles
The official then shifted the focus to Juan Carlos Maquedawho “was the one who was in charge of Obra Social until 2021. This fact is undeniable for the following reasons: Dr. Maqueda expressly acknowledges it in the email that was read at the Political Trial Commission and that he himself sent to that Commission; before I entered, the Court, the Council and the Work were a single unit and controlled by the administrator”.
On the other hand, he clarified that when Lorenzetti presided over the body “the areas were distributed among the ministers (Zaffaroni and Lorenzetti in the CIJ, Argibay in the forensic medical corps and the women’s office; Highton in the domestic violence office, etc.). Maqueda was left in charge of the Obra and expressly asked that it not be included in an agreement, which I know because I have to certify the agreements, Dr. Lorenzetti, who was president, told me that it was Maqueda’s decision and he ratified it.
Likewise, Marchi indicated that “on April 7, 2008, the statute of the Work was approved with a board of directors (Agreed 5/2008) that was in force until the year 2021.”
“There was a board of directors, a minister in charge and this governed peacefully for 13 years, without any participation from the Administration,” he asserted.
According to the witness statement, Maqueda proposed the director Aldo Tonón and Claudia Madiesbut he quickly asked Madies to resign, so only the former remained in office.
Survey: who wins the Buenos Aires internship in Together for Change
“The appointment of personal physician Tonón and private secretary Marta Herrera is an very clear proof of Maqueda’s control over Obra Social”, Marchi stated.
“Dr Maqueda”, continued the accountant, “resigned from his role in Obra Social and proposed that the administration supervise”. At the request of Rosatti, Dr. Althabe was appointed, who was hired on October 15, 2021.
“Control remained in the hands of Dr. Maqueda and Dr. Rosatti, since Tonón and Althabe continued on the Board of Directors. Proof of this is that the administration only submitted reports,” Marchi continued.
“It is absurd to say the opposite, because if the administration had been in control of the work, I would not have criticized myself, and the Obra Social would have had a better administration, just look at the 30 recommendations that I made to the Obra Social ”, he detailed.
As to Silvio Robles, held him responsible for “the attacks” and multiple threats which he practiced in court.
“He promoted my displacement and is appointing personnel in key areas such as security, administration, etc.”, accused Marchi.
He also blamed the official close to Rosatti for having threatened “to various employees, telling him that he manages the majority of the Court and that they have to obey him because otherwise he will transfer them.”
Robles, according to the witness, “did not properly communicate” the last report resulting from the audit on the Obra Social corresponding to the management of Althabewho is the current director proposed by Horacio Rosatti.
Marchi slipped that the report in question was not available to all ministers. “Silvio Robles received it on August 26, 2022 and this report was the one that created the beginning of all the problems since Dr. Rosatti did not want to receive it or publish it,” he declared.
CA/ED
You may also like
1683168832
#Marchi #assured #victim #alleged #irregularities #social #work #Judiciary
