San Jose officials are facing increasing pressure to align the city’s investments with its values, potentially leading to divestment from companies involved with federal immigration enforcement, the military, and the prison-industrial complex. The San Jose City Council is scheduled to discuss the issue on March 24th as part of its annual review of the city’s investment policy, a conversation fueled by growing advocacy for corporate accountability.
A coalition of local advocates is urging the city to cut financial ties with corporations that profit from activities they deem harmful or inconsistent with San Jose’s progressive stance. The initial focus of the movement stemmed from concerns over Israel’s actions during the Israel-Hamas war, but has broadened to encompass a wider range of corporate practices, including those related to mass incarceration and detention. This push for divestment reflects a growing national trend, organizers say, particularly in response to perceived injustices and human rights concerns.
Focus on ICE Contracts Sparks Debate
The debate centers on companies that contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other federal agencies. According to a review, just one company, Microsoft, currently holds a contract with ICE within San Jose’s investment portfolio. The computer software giant’s involvement has become a focal point for activists demanding a more ethical approach to city investments. Microsoft operates a substantial data center in San Jose, with a maximum electrical load of 99 megawatts, and utilizes renewable natural gas generators for backup power according to the California Energy Commission.
Drusie Kazanova, co-founder of San Jose Against War, a leading organization in the divestment effort, believes momentum is building. “There’s a mass movement in resistance to the Trump administration and their attacks, both domestically and abroad,” Kazanova stated. The organizers have employed various tactics, including rallies, letter-writing campaigns, and an online petition, to amplify their message and pressure city leaders.
Financial Concerns Complicate the Issue
Despite the growing support for divestment, some councilmembers have expressed reservations, citing potential negative impacts on the city’s financial stability. San Jose is currently facing a projected $56 million budget shortfall, according to Mayor Matt Mahan, raising concerns that divesting from certain companies could exacerbate the financial strain. Mahan acknowledged the calls for divestment in a message to residents on Monday, indicating the city is carefully considering the implications of such a policy.
Data Center Expansion and PG&E Partnership
The discussion around investment policy comes as San Jose actively seeks to attract more data centers to the South Bay. In July 2025, the city and Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) announced a partnership aimed at providing power delivery guarantees to data center developers as reported by KQED. This initiative, coupled with a recent $9 million easement agreement approved for a Microsoft data center expansion according to Getobedio, highlights the city’s commitment to fostering growth in the tech sector.
The potential conflict between attracting investment and upholding ethical investment principles presents a significant challenge for the City Council. Balancing economic development with social responsibility will be crucial as they navigate this complex issue.
The March 24th City Council meeting promises to be a pivotal moment in this debate. The outcome will likely set a precedent for how San Jose approaches its investment strategy and its commitment to aligning financial decisions with community values. Residents are encouraged to follow the discussion and engage with their elected officials to voice their perspectives.
Share your thoughts on this developing story in the comments below.
