Ming Dan at 49: Advocating for Justice Over Ex-Husband’s Home from the Anti-Japanese War Era

October 7, 2025

Beijing – On the first birthday following the passing of Taiwanese Actress Xu Xiyuan, widely known as Big S, her legal representative issued a poignant statement, emphasizing her character and reaffirming a commitment to pursuing justice in several outstanding legal matters. The statement,released on October 6th,has resonated widely across entertainment and legal circles.

A Client of Unwavering Integrity

Deng Gaojing,the attorney entrusted by Big S,delivered a heartfelt message via Weibo,describing the actress as “the most ideal client a lawyer could hope for.” He praised her consistent lawfulness, honesty, and fairness, noting her meticulous provision of evidence in all legal proceedings. He assured that,nonetheless of her location,justice will prevail.

According to reports, Big S entrusted Deng Gaojing with representation in three notable cases during her lifetime. These included disputes concerning rights infringement related to Zhang lan and TikTok,allegations of online defamation by Wang Xiaofei,and a private criminal prosecution against Zhang Lan for alleged defamation.

Status of Ongoing Litigation

Currently, the case involving Zhang Lan and TikTok remains active in the Beijing courts, with proceedings underway to formalize a change in representation following Big S’s death. The other two cases-those against Wang Xiaofei and the criminal prosecution of Zhang Lan-have reportedly been either withdrawn or terminated.

This period of legal activity follows a trend of celebrity rights protection in China. In 2024, Reuters reported a significant increase in cases filed by celebrities to safeguard their reputations and intellectual property. This reflects both a growing awareness of legal recourse and evolving legal frameworks designed to protect public figures.

Case Name	Status	Key Parties Involved
Zhang Lan & TikTok Rights Infringement	Active – Court Proceedings Ongoing	Big S, Zhang Lan, TikTok
Wang Xiaofei Online Infringement	terminated/Withdrawn	Big S, Wang Xiaofei
criminal Prosecution of Zhang Lan	terminated/Withdrawn	Big S, Zhang Lan

Did You Know? Celebrity legal battles in China often attract considerable public attention, influencing public discourse surrounding online behavior and defamation laws.

Pro Tip: Always document any instances of online harassment or defamation, as this evidence may be crucial in pursuing legal action.

The Growing Trend of Celebrity Legal Action

The willingness of public figures to pursue legal remedies for defamation and rights infringement is a global phenomenon. This trend is driven by several factors, including the increasing reach of social media, the potential for significant reputational damage, and the evolving legal landscape surrounding online content. The case involving big S is just one example of the growing focus on protecting the rights of individuals in the digital age.

Frequently Asked Questions About Big S’s Legal Cases

• what was Big S known for? Big S was a prominent Taiwanese actress.
• What is the current status of the Zhang Lan and TikTok case? the case is currently active and being handled by the Beijing court.
• Why did Big S pursue these legal cases? She sought to protect her reputation and rights against alleged infringements.
• Who is deng Gaojing? Deng Gaojing is the lawyer who represented Big S in these legal matters.
• What kind of legal framework exists to protect celebrities in china? China’s legal framework surrounding celebrity rights is evolving, with courts seeing a surge in related cases.

What are your thoughts on the rise of legal battles involving public figures? Do you believe social media platforms should be more accountable for defamatory content? Share your opinions in the comments below!

What are the potential implications of Ming Dan’s case for property law and heritage preservation in China?

The Case of ming Dan: A fight for Historical Property Rights

Ming Dan, at 49, is currently embroiled in a high-profile legal battle concerning a property deeply rooted in China’s history – a home built during the tumultuous Anti-Japanese War era. This isn’t simply a divorce case; it’s a fight for recognition of historical significance and a challenge to the valuation of cultural heritage within the Chinese legal system. The core of the dispute revolves around the ownership of a traditional siheyuan (courtyard residence) in Beijing, acquired by her ex-husband, Li Wei, before their marriage and now claimed by Ming Dan as a jointly-owned asset deserving of a valuation reflecting its historical importance.

Historical Context: Siheyuan and the Anti-Japanese War

Siheyuan are traditional courtyard residences representing a significant part of Beijing’s architectural and cultural heritage. Many were constructed or adapted during the Anti-Japanese war (1937-1945) as safe havens and centers of resistance. Thes homes frequently enough served as meeting places for intellectuals, artists, and activists, and some even housed underground networks supporting the war effort.

The specific siheyuan in question, located in the Dongcheng District of Beijing, dates back to 1938. Records suggest it was originally commissioned by a prominent scholar involved in disseminating anti-Japanese propaganda.Its architectural features and documented history contribute to its cultural value, a point Ming Dan is fiercely advocating. Understanding this historical backdrop is crucial to grasping the complexity of the case. keywords: Siheyuan, Beijing architecture, Anti-Japanese war history, Chinese cultural heritage, historical property.

The Legal battle: Valuation and Ownership Disputes

Li Wei argues the property should be valued solely as a residential asset,based on current market rates for similar properties in the area. This valuation significantly undervalues the siheyuan due to its historical significance. ming Dan contends that a specialized appraisal,considering its architectural style,historical context,and cultural importance,is necessary. She’s seeking a valuation that reflects its unique status, potentially increasing its worth substantially.

The legal challenge highlights a gap in Chinese property law regarding the valuation of properties wiht significant historical or cultural value. Current regulations primarily focus on market-based assessments,often overlooking the intangible benefits associated with heritage sites. This case could set a precedent for future disputes involving similar properties.Keywords: property law China, historical property valuation, cultural heritage law, divorce settlements, asset division.

Ming Dan’s Advocacy: Beyond Personal Gain

Ming Dan’s fight extends beyond securing a larger share of the marital assets. She views the case as an chance to raise awareness about the importance of preserving China’s cultural heritage. She’s actively collaborating with historians and preservationists to document the siheyuan’s history and advocate for its protection.

Her efforts include:

* Gathering Historical Evidence: Compiling archival documents, photographs, and testimonies to establish the siheyuan’s historical significance.

* Public Awareness Campaigns: Utilizing social media and interviews to raise public awareness about the case and the broader issue of heritage preservation.

* legal Precedent: Hoping to establish a legal precedent for valuing historical properties based on their cultural and historical merit, not just market value.

This proactive approach positions Ming Dan as a champion for cultural preservation, attracting support from heritage organizations and concerned citizens. Keywords: cultural preservation, heritage advocacy, historical preservation China, property rights activism.

Expert Opinions and Supporting Evidence

Historians specializing in the Anti-Japanese War era have provided expert testimony supporting Ming Dan’s claims. Dr. Zhang Wei, a leading scholar on beijing’s architectural history, stated, “This siheyuan is a tangible link to a crucial period in Chinese history.Its preservation is not merely a matter of property rights; it’s a matter of safeguarding our collective memory.”

Documentary evidence, including a letter from a prominent resistance leader dated 1942, found within the siheyuan’s archives, further strengthens Ming dan’s case. This letter details a secret meeting held at the residence, confirming its role in the anti-Japanese movement. Keywords: expert testimony, historical evidence, archival research, cultural significance, Beijing history.

Potential Outcomes and Future Implications

The outcome of Ming Dan’s case could have far-reaching implications for property law and heritage preservation in China.

* Favorable Ruling for Ming Dan: could lead to a revised valuation methodology for historical properties, incorporating cultural and historical factors.

* Unfavorable Ruling: May reinforce the current market-based valuation system, potentially hindering efforts to protect cultural heritage.

* Legislative Changes: The case could prompt lawmakers to consider amendments to property laws to better address the unique challenges of valuing historical properties.

Nonetheless of the outcome, Ming Dan’s advocacy has already sparked a national conversation about the importance of preserving China’s cultural heritage and the need for a more nuanced approach to property valuation. Keywords: legal precedent, property law reform, heritage protection policy, cultural heritage management, Chinese legal system.

Real-World Examples: Similar Cases & Challenges

While ming Dan’s case is unique in its specifics, it echoes challenges faced in other historical preservation disputes globally. In Kyoto, Japan, similar battles have been fought over the preservation of traditional machiya townhouses