Home » News » New revenge of Trump, via the escort to Kamala Harris

New revenge of Trump, via the escort to Kamala Harris

by James Carter Senior News Editor

Trump Revokes Secret Service Detail for Kamala Harris – A Pattern of Political Retaliation Escalates

WASHINGTON D.C. – In a move widely condemned as politically motivated, former President Donald Trump has ordered the immediate removal of Secret Service protection for Kamala Harris, despite a recent, secret extension granted by President Joe Biden. This breaking news development comes just ahead of Harris’s planned book tour promoting ‘107 Days,’ a campaign memoir, and adds to a growing list of individuals targeted by Trump since his return to the White House. This story is developing and Archyde.com is committed to providing the latest updates.

Harris Loses Protection Despite Past Threats

While Harris’s six-month post-Vice Presidential protection period officially expired in July, President Biden quietly authorized a one-year extension. Trump, however, swiftly overturned that decision, citing an assessment that reportedly found no “alarming” threats. Critics argue this justification is flimsy, given Harris’s history of receiving threats during her time in public office. The removal includes not only her personal security detail and residence security in Los Angeles, but also the intelligence gathering operations designed to proactively identify and mitigate potential risks.

Doug Emhoff, Harris’s husband, already lost his Secret Service detail on July 1st, as mandated by law. This latest action, however, is seen as a deliberate escalation, particularly given the timing coinciding with Harris’s high-profile book tour across all 50 states.

Outrage from California Leaders & a Growing List of Targets

The decision has drawn immediate condemnation from California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who labeled it “another act of revenge.” Mayor Bass pledged to ensure Harris’s safety within the city of Los Angeles, despite the federal withdrawal of protection.

This isn’t an isolated incident. Since regaining office, Trump has revoked security details from a remarkable number of individuals, including Ashley and Hunter Biden, former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Anthony Fauci, former Secretaries of State Mike Pompeo and John Bolton (who has become a vocal critic of Trump and is currently under Department of Justice investigation). This pattern raises serious questions about the weaponization of executive power and the potential chilling effect on dissent.

Beyond Security Details: Investigations and Clearance Revocations

The scope of Trump’s actions extends beyond simply removing security. A parallel wave of investigations has been launched targeting prominent figures who have opposed him. Special Prosecutor Jack Smith, New York Prosecutor Letitia James, former Governors Chris Christie and Andrew Cuomo, and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook are all facing scrutiny.

Furthermore, Trump has revoked security clearances – the ability to access classified information – from a wide range of individuals, including President Biden, Hillary Clinton, former National Security Councilor Jake Sullivan, and former Secretary of State Anthony Blinken. SEO experts note that this broad targeting is unusual and fuels concerns about a systematic effort to undermine political opponents.

The Historical Context: Presidential Transitions and Security Protocols

Traditionally, the Secret Service provides a period of protection for former Presidents, Vice Presidents, and their families, recognizing the inherent risks associated with their public profiles. While the duration of this protection is subject to review and budgetary considerations, the abrupt and seemingly punitive nature of Trump’s actions is unprecedented. This situation highlights the importance of clear, non-partisan guidelines for security protocols during presidential transitions. Understanding these protocols is crucial for informed civic engagement and holding leaders accountable.

The implications of this move are far-reaching, potentially setting a dangerous precedent for future administrations. It raises fundamental questions about the boundaries of presidential power and the protection of democratic institutions. Archyde.com will continue to monitor this developing story and provide in-depth analysis as it unfolds. Stay tuned for updates and expert commentary on this critical issue, and explore our other Google News-featured articles for comprehensive coverage of US politics.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.