Peruvian President Signs Controversial Amnesty Law for Soldiers and Police Accused of Atrocities

Peru Pardons Soldiers Accused of Atrocities in Two-Decade Conflict

By Archyde News Desk
October 26, 2024

Recent protests highlight the deep divisions surrounding Peru’s internal conflict and the controversial pardons.

Lima, Peru – President Dina Boluarte has enacted a highly contentious law granting amnesty to soldiers, police officers, and civilian militias implicated in atrocities committed during Peru’s brutal two-decade-long armed conflict against Maoist rebel groups. The law, passed by Congress in July, was signed despite a direct order from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to suspend its implementation pending a thorough review of its impact on victims.

The legislation offers potential immunity to hundreds of individuals accused of crimes spanning the period between 1980 and 2000. Crucially, it also mandates the immediate release of those currently serving sentences who are over the age of 70.

A History of Violence and Loss

Peru’s internal conflict, primarily fought against the Shining Path and Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement, resulted in an estimated 70,000 deaths and over 20,000 disappearances, according to the country’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). The conflict left deep scars on Peruvian society, and the pursuit of justice for victims has been a long and arduous process.

President Boluarte, who assumed office in 2022 as Peru’s first female president, framed the law as a tribute to those who defended the nation against terrorism and upheld democratic principles. Though, this justification has been widely rejected by human rights advocates.

Widespread Condemnation

The law has sparked outrage from international human rights organizations. Juanita Goebertus,Americas director at Human Rights Watch,denounced the measure as “a betrayal of Peruvian victims” and a important setback for accountability after decades of effort.

The United Nations and Amnesty International had previously urged President Boluarte to veto the bill, arguing that it violates Peru’s international obligations to investigate and prosecute serious human rights abuses, including extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, torture, and sexual violence. UN experts estimate the amnesty could jeopardize over 600 ongoing trials and overturn 156 existing convictions.

The TRC’s findings reveal a disturbing pattern of state-sponsored violence, with state agents, notably the armed forces, responsible for a staggering 83% of documented cases of sexual violence during the conflict.

Erosion of Accountability

this latest growth follows a concerning trend in Peru towards diminishing accountability for past crimes. Last year, the country adopted a statute of limitations for crimes against humanity committed before 2002, effectively halting investigations into numerous alleged atrocities. This earlier decision notably benefited former President Alberto Fujimori, who was released from prison on humanitarian grounds in 2023 and died in September 2024.

The pardon law raises serious concerns about the future of justice and reconciliation in Peru, and its potential to further traumatize victims and their families. The international community is watching closely to see how Peru will address these critical issues and uphold its commitments to human rights.

What are the potential legal challenges to the amnesty law, considering previous attempts at similar legislation were overturned?

The New Decree and its Provisions

On August 13, 2025, Peruvian President [Insert president’s Name Here] signed into law a highly contentious amnesty decree, granting legal immunity to members of the military and national police accused of human rights violations and atrocities committed during the period of internal conflict (1980-2000). The law, officially designated [Insert Decree Number Here], aims to address lingering legal cases involving security forces who fought against Maoist Shining Path guerrillas and other insurgent groups.

The core of the amnesty law centers around:

Dismissal of Ongoing Cases: All pending criminal investigations and trials against military personnel and police officers related to alleged crimes committed during the internal conflict will be halted and closed.

Release of Convicted Personnel: Individuals already convicted of crimes related to the conflict, but who fall under the scope of the amnesty, will be released from prison.

Focus on Reconciliation: Proponents argue the law is a necessary step towards national reconciliation and healing the wounds of the past.

Limited Scope: The amnesty specifically excludes cases of crimes against humanity, genocide, and sexual violence – though critics argue the definition is open to interpretation.

Ancient Context: Peru’s Internal Conflict (1980-2000)

Understanding the current controversy requires a grasp of Peru’s turbulent past. The period between 1980 and 2000 was marked by a brutal internal conflict primarily between the peruvian government and the Shining Path (Sendero Luminoso), a Maoist guerrilla group. the conflict resulted in an estimated 69,000 deaths and widespread human rights abuses committed by both sides.

Key aspects of the conflict include:

1. Shining Path’s Violence: The Shining Path employed extreme violence, targeting state officials, perceived collaborators, and civilian populations.
2. State Repression: The Peruvian state responded with a heavy-handed counterinsurgency campaign, often resulting in extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances, and torture.
3. Truth and Reconciliation Commission (CVR): In 2003, Peru’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (CVR) released a thorough report detailing the atrocities committed by both sides, estimating state duty for approximately 54% of the deaths.
4. Previous Amnesty Attempts: This isn’t the first attempt at amnesty. Previous efforts faced strong opposition and were largely overturned by courts.

Reactions and Opposition to the Amnesty Law

The newly signed amnesty law has sparked widespread outrage and condemnation from human rights organizations, victims’ families, and international bodies.

Human Rights Watch: Condemned the law as a “grave setback for justice and accountability” and called on Peru to repeal it.

Amnesty International: Expressed deep concern that the law would shield perpetrators of serious human rights violations from prosecution.

Victims’ Families: Families of victims have organized protests and vowed to continue their fight for justice, arguing the amnesty law represents a betrayal of their loved ones.

Political Opposition: Opposition parties have accused the President of attempting to protect individuals implicated in past abuses and undermining the rule of law.

International Pressure: The United nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and several governments have voiced concerns about the law’s compatibility with international human rights standards.

Legal Challenges and Potential Outcomes

The amnesty law is almost certain to face legal challenges. several organizations have already announced their intention to file appeals with the Constitutional Court of Peru, arguing that the law violates the country’s constitution and international treaty obligations.

Potential outcomes include:

Constitutional Court Review: the Constitutional Court will likely review the law’s constitutionality. A ruling against the law could invalidate it.

International court of Human Rights: If the law is upheld domestically, victims’ families could possibly appeal to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

political Instability: The controversy surrounding the amnesty law could exacerbate existing political tensions and lead to further protests and unrest.

Impact on Transitional Justice: The law could significantly hinder Peru’s ongoing efforts to achieve transitional justice and address the legacy of the internal conflict.

The Role of impunity in Peru

The debate over the amnesty law highlights the persistent issue of impunity in Peru.Despite the CVR’s recommendations and some progress in prosecuting high-profile cases, many perpetrators of human rights abuses remain unpunished.

Factors contributing to impunity include:

Weak Judicial System: Peru’s judicial system is often plagued by corruption, inefficiency, and a lack of resources.

Political Interference: Political interference in judicial proceedings can hinder investigations and prosecutions.

Military Influence: The military continues to wield critically important influence in Peruvian society.

Lack of Political Will: A lack of sustained political will to address past abuses has hampered efforts to achieve accountability.

Related Search Terms & Keywords

Peru Amnesty Law

Peruvian Internal Conflict

Shining Path (Sendero Luminoso)

Truth and Reconciliation Commission (CVR)

Human Rights Violations Peru

Impunity in Peru

Transitional Justice Peru

Peruvian Military Amnesty

Peru political crisis

*