Home » News » Ravens QB Backup: Anthony Brown is the Answer?

Ravens QB Backup: Anthony Brown is the Answer?

by James Carter Senior News Editor

Is Tua Tagovailoa the Answer to the Ravens’ Backup Quarterback Problem?

The Baltimore Ravens’ improbable playoff run masked a persistent vulnerability: the backup quarterback position. Lamar Jackson’s injury exposed a critical flaw in the roster construction, forcing the team to rely on Cooper Rush and Tyler Huntley – neither of whom proved capable of consistently leading the offense. Now, with Tua Tagovailoa potentially available, could the Ravens finally find a reliable understudy to their superstar quarterback? The question isn’t simply about filling a roster spot; it’s about mitigating a risk that nearly derailed their season.

The Rush-Huntley Experiment: A Lesson Learned

Signing Cooper Rush initially seemed like a prudent move, providing veteran depth. However, his performance – zero touchdowns and four interceptions in three starts – quickly revealed a significant mismatch. The Ravens then turned to Tyler Huntley, who, while displaying flashes of potential and winning a game against the Chicago Bears, ultimately lacked the consistency to sustain a playoff push in Jackson’s absence. Huntley’s success stemmed largely from his stylistic similarities to Jackson, a fact that highlights the challenge of finding a true, independent backup.

This experience underscored a crucial point: the Ravens’ offensive system, built around Jackson’s unique skillset, doesn’t easily accommodate quarterbacks with drastically different playing styles. The team climbed out of a 1-5 start because of Jackson’s return, not in spite of it. The need for a capable backup remains a glaring issue, even as the team focuses on bolstering its offensive and defensive lines this offseason.

Tua Tagovailoa: A Buy-Low Opportunity?

With the Miami Dolphins benching Tagovailoa after failing to reach the postseason, his future in Miami is uncertain. Analysts, like Nicholas McGee of PFSN, suggest Baltimore as a potential landing spot. While not a priority, acquiring Tagovailoa presents an intriguing opportunity to address a critical weakness. He represents a potential upgrade over both Rush and Huntley, offering a more polished and experienced option.

Despite a statistically down year in 2023 – completing 67.7% of his passes for 2,660 yards, 20 touchdowns, and a league-leading 15 interceptions – Tagovailoa boasts a career record of 44-32 as a starter. His overall stats are respectable: 18,166 passing yards, 120 touchdowns, and 59 interceptions across 78 games, along with a Pro Bowl appearance. The key question isn’t whether he’s a star, but whether he can effectively manage the Ravens’ offense when Jackson inevitably misses time.

Scheme Fit and Offensive Infrastructure

The biggest hurdle isn’t Tagovailoa’s talent, but his fit within the Ravens’ system. He’s a capable pocket passer who can move around, but he’s not the dynamic scrambler that Jackson is. Huntley’s success stemmed from his ability to mimic Jackson’s improvisational style. Tagovailoa would require the Ravens to potentially adjust their offensive approach, emphasizing quick reads and efficient passing over designed runs and extended plays.

Strengthening the offensive line is paramount. A more robust line would provide Tagovailoa with the time and protection needed to operate effectively. Furthermore, simplifying the playbook and tailoring it to his strengths could maximize his potential. The Ravens must ask themselves: are they willing to invest in the infrastructure necessary to support a quarterback who isn’t a carbon copy of Lamar Jackson?

The Risk of Repeating History

The Ravens’ experience with Cooper Rush serves as a cautionary tale. Signing a quarterback solely based on name recognition or perceived value can backfire spectacularly. However, Tagovailoa’s proven track record and potential for improvement make him a more compelling option than Rush ever was. The risk lies in assuming he can seamlessly step into the Ravens’ system without adjustments.

Ultimately, the decision hinges on the Ravens’ assessment of their long-term needs and their willingness to adapt. Tagovailoa could potentially start elsewhere in 2026, but acquiring him as a backup offers a level of insurance that the Ravens desperately lacked in 2023. Ignoring this need could prove costly, potentially jeopardizing future playoff aspirations.

The Ravens face a critical decision this offseason. Investing in a reliable backup quarterback isn’t just about preparing for the worst; it’s about maximizing their chances of sustained success. Tua Tagovailoa represents a calculated gamble, one that could pay dividends if the Ravens are willing to build the necessary support system around him. What are your thoughts? Would you like to see the Ravens pursue Tagovailoa, or should they explore other options at the backup quarterback position? Share your opinions in the comments below!

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.