Redefining Digital Privacy in Employment: Milan Court’s New Boundaries on Private and Public Digital Communications

Italian Court Defines Limits of Employer Access to Employee Communications

September 26, 2025

milan, Italy – A recent decision by the Milan court has established a crucial precedent regarding employee digital privacy, specifically addressing the extent to which employers can utilize employee communications as grounds for disciplinary action. The ruling draws a distinct line between private messaging platforms, such as WhatsApp, and public social media channels like Facebook, impacting employers and employees alike.

The case stemmed from the dismissal of an environmental sector employee in October 2024, following accusations of misconduct dating back to October 2021. The company cited both audio messages exchanged within a corporate WhatsApp group and a publicly visible post on the employee’s personal Facebook profile as justification for the termination.

The Core of the Dispute

Specifically, the accusations involved audio recordings containing allegedly defamatory remarks against the mayor of Lacchiarella, and aggressive statements directed towards a local police commander, all shared within the company WhatsApp chat. Additionally, the employee had posted an offensive remark about urban police on his public Facebook profile.

Central to the Court’s deliberation was the interpretation of Article 15 of the Italian Constitution, which guarantees the inviolability of personal correspondence and interaction.The Court had to determine how this constitutional protection applies to modern digital communication methods.

WhatsApp vs. Facebook: A Critical Distinction

The employee’s defense argued that accessing whatsapp chats for disciplinary purposes was unlawful, referencing prior rulings. The Court agreed, citing a 2018 Supreme Court ordinance stating that messages exchanged in private chats-intended for a limited group-do not constitute just cause for dismissal.

Crucially, the Court ruled that even if an employer gains access to private communications through third parties, without directly intruding, it still represents a breach of privacy. A recent Cassation ordinance from march 6, 2025, reinforced this, emphasizing that obtaining secretly communicated facts, even through a recipient’s actions, is a violation.

The Court also clarified that the use of a company-provided mobile phone does not negate the private nature of communications, provided access remains restricted to chat participants.

Public Posts Face Diffrent Scrutiny

In contrast to the WhatsApp messages, the Facebook post was deemed admissible as evidence. The Court emphasized that the post was of a “public nature,” accessible to an undefined audience,including the employer. The content was considered objectively offensive and not protected under freedom of speech provisions, as it lacked any considerable critical thought.

The situation was further aggravated as the employee identified their employment and role within the company on the platform, creating a direct link between the offensive statements and the employer’s image.

Dismissal Deemed Disproportionate

Despite finding the facebook post justifiable for disciplinary action, the Court ultimately deemed the dismissal for ‘just cause’ to be disproportionate. The Court noted the company based its decision on all contested evidence, while the Facebook post represented the only genuinely disciplinary infraction and was considered the least serious of the allegations.

implications for Employers and Employees

This ruling underscores the evolving legal landscape surrounding digital privacy in the workplace. Employers are now firmly cautioned against accessing or utilizing the content of private employee communications, even if obtained incidentally. However, public communications on social media remain subject to scrutiny.

Experts suggest companies should implement clear digital communication policies outlining permissible and prohibited behaviors. Employees, conversely, must exercise caution and professionalism in their public online communications, particularly when their employment is identifiable.

Did You Know? According to a 2024 study by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), 68% of organizations monitor employee social media activity, but only 38% have formal social media policies.

Communication Channel	Privacy level	Employer Access
WhatsApp (Private chat)	High	Generally Prohibited
Facebook (Public Profile)	Low	Permissible, with Limitations

Pro Tip: Regularly review your social media privacy settings and consider separating professional and personal accounts.

The Evolving Landscape of Digital Workplace Rights

The legal interpretation of employee digital privacy is continually evolving. globally, jurisdictions are grappling with similar questions as technology blurs the lines between personal and professional life. The rise of remote work, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has further complicated these issues, as employees increasingly rely on personal devices for work-related communications. Recent legislation in the European Union, such as the Digital Services Act, also impacts data privacy expectations.

this case highlights the importance of openness and establishing clear boundaries in the digital workplace. Organizations must prioritize employee education and implement robust policies that respect individual privacy while protecting legitimate business interests.

Frequently Asked Questions About Employee Digital Privacy

• What is considered a private communication? A private communication is one intended for a limited audience and not publicly accessible, such as a message within a closed WhatsApp group.
• Can my employer access my personal email? Generally, no, unless there is a clear violation of company policy or legal requirements.
• What about company-issued devices? While a company owns the device, communications on it can still be considered private if access is restricted.
• Can I be disciplined for social media posts unrelated to work? Perhaps, if the posts damage the company’s reputation or violate established policies.
• What steps can employers take to protect their interests? Implement clear social media and digital communication policies,and provide employee training.

What are your thoughts on this ruling? Do you believe employers should have more or less access to employee communications?

Share this article with your network and join the conversation!

What specific conditions must employers meet to legally justify employee monitoring according to the Milan court ruling?

Redefining Digital Privacy in Employment: Milan Court’s New Boundaries on Private adn Public Digital Communications

The Milan Ruling: A Landmark Decision for Employee Digital Rights

In a significant progress for employee privacy, a milan court recently issued a ruling that’s sending ripples through the legal and HR landscapes. This decision establishes new, stricter boundaries regarding employer access to employee digital communications – both on company-provided devices and, crucially, on personal devices used for work purposes. The core of the ruling centers on the principle of proportionality and the need for clear justification when monitoring employee digital activity. This isn’t simply about restricting surveillance; it’s about defining what constitutes legitimate business need versus an infringement on basic rights. Workplace monitoring, data protection, and employee surveillance are now under intense scrutiny.

Understanding the Scope of the Ruling

The Milan court’s decision doesn’t outright ban employee monitoring. Rather, it clarifies how that monitoring can legally occur. Key takeaways include:

* proportionality is Paramount: Employers must demonstrate a compelling and proportionate reason for monitoring.Blanket surveillance is no longer acceptable. The monitoring must be directly related to legitimate business interests, such as preventing data breaches, protecting trade secrets, or ensuring compliance with regulations.

* Clear Policies are Essential: Companies need comprehensive and transparent digital privacy policies outlining exactly what data is collected, how it’s used, and for how long it’s retained. These policies must be readily accessible to all employees.

* notice and Consent: While explicit consent isn’t always required (depending on local laws and the nature of the monitoring), employees must be clearly informed about the monitoring practices. Lack of transparency can invalidate monitoring efforts.

* Distinction Between Public and Private Communications: The ruling emphasizes a stronger distinction between public and private communications. Accessing personal emails or messaging apps on an employee’s personal device requires a substantially higher level of justification than monitoring company email or work-related communication channels.

* Data Minimization: Employers should only collect the minimum amount of data necesary to achieve their legitimate business objectives. excessive data collection is viewed as a violation of privacy.

Implications for Employers: A Compliance Checklist

This ruling necessitates a thorough review of existing workplace privacy practices. Here’s a checklist for employers to ensure compliance:

1. Review and Update Policies: Scrutinize your current digital privacy policies. Are they clear, comprehensive, and compliant with the Milan court’s ruling and relevant GDPR guidelines?
2. Conduct a Data Mapping Exercise: Identify all the types of employee data your organization collects, where it’s stored, and how it’s used.
3. Implement Proportional Monitoring: Ensure that any monitoring activities are directly linked to legitimate business needs and are proportionate to the risk being addressed.
4. Provide Employee Training: Educate employees about your digital privacy policies and their rights.
5. Consider Data Encryption: Implement data encryption measures to protect sensitive employee facts.
6. Regularly Audit Monitoring Practices: Conduct regular audits to ensure that monitoring activities remain compliant and effective.
7. Legal Counsel Consultation: Engage with legal counsel specializing in data privacy law to ensure full compliance.

The Role of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Policies

The rise of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) policies complicates the issue of employee digital privacy. The milan ruling highlights the need for notably careful consideration when dealing with personal devices.

* Clear Separation of Personal and work Data: BYOD policies should clearly delineate between personal and work data on the device. Employers should only have access to work-related data.

* Mobile Device Management (MDM) Solutions: Implementing MDM solutions can help enforce security policies and separate work and personal data, but transparency with employees is crucial.

* Employee Control: Employees should retain control over their personal devices and the ability to remove work-related applications or data when they leave the company.

Case Study: The Italian Data Protection Authority & Telecom Italia (2020)

While not directly the Milan court ruling,a 2020 case involving the Italian Data protection Authority and Telecom italia provides a relevant precedent. The Authority fined telecom Italia for excessive monitoring of employee internet usage, finding that the monitoring was not proportionate to the legitimate business interests being pursued. this case underscores the importance of demonstrating a clear and justifiable reason for monitoring. This demonstrates the growing trend of stricter enforcement of digital rights in Europe.

Benefits of Prioritizing employee Digital Privacy

Beyond legal compliance, prioritizing employee digital privacy offers several benefits:

* Increased Employee Trust: Demonstrating respect for employee privacy fosters trust and improves morale.

* Enhanced Productivity: Employees who feel trusted are more likely to be engaged and productive.

* Improved Talent Acquisition: A strong commitment to privacy can attract and retain top talent.

* Reduced Legal Risk: Proactive compliance minimizes the risk of costly legal disputes and fines.

* Stronger Employer Brand: A reputation for ethical data handling enhances your employer brand.

Practical Tips for Employees: Protecting Your Digital Footprint at Work

employees also have a role to play in protecting their digital privacy:

*