Russia Accuses Sanctions of Derailing UN-Led Food Deal

Russia Declares Black Sea Grain Deal Collapsed Amid Western Sanctions

By Archyde News

Russia announced Saturday that its agreement, designed too facilitate the export of Russian food and fertilizers, has collapsed.the nation cited Western sanctions imposed over its offensive in Ukraine as the reason for the dealS demise.

This declaration follows the United Nations’ statement a day prior, confirming the pact’s end on July 22. The agreement, initially signed in 2022, aimed to help stabilize global food prices.

A source close to the discussions, who requested anonymity, confirmed to AFP that the deal would not be renewed due to ongoing disagreements. The foundation of the agreement was laid with the UN and Russia on July 22, 2022.

However,Russia’s foreign Ministry stated that extending the deal is not currently envisioned. The ministry elaborated that the “destructive line of Western capitals to increase illegal unilateral sanctions against Russia” has prevented any of the agreement’s objectives from being successfully met.

While economic sanctions on Russia generally exempted fertilizers and grain, concerns about inadvertently violating these measures had a chilling affect on transporters and considerably increased insurance costs.

Following extensive negotiations, Russia and the UN established a framework. This framework was intended to streamline insurance and financial transactions, ensuring compliance with U.S., British, and European Union sanctions systems.

Russia, the world’s leading fertilizer producer, had consistently voiced dissatisfaction, arguing the agreement offered insufficient protection against the secondary effects of these sanctions.Despite this, Russia’s Foreign Ministry indicated that discussions between the parties could continue. This continuation would be for the sake of global food security.

A separate accord, also under UN auspices, was signed on july 22, 2022.This deal focused on enabling the export of Ukrainian grain, which had been blocked due to Russia’s military actions in the country.

That second agreement was generally viewed as more prosperous. however, Moscow, frustrated by persistent obstacles to its own agricultural trade, refused to renew it after it expired in July 2023.

Frequently Asked Questions

• What was the Black Sea Grain initiative?

  The Black Sea Grain initiative was an agreement signed in 2022 between Russia and the United Nations to facilitate the export of Russian food and fertilizers, and Ukrainian grain, to help stabilize global food prices.

• Why did Russia state the deal collapsed?

  Russia claims the deal collapsed due to Western sanctions imposed over its actions in Ukraine, arguing that these sanctions, despite exemptions, hindered its ability to export food and fertilizers.

• What was the impact of Western sanctions?

  While sanctions officially spared fertilizers and grain, fears of accidental violations led to increased insurance costs and paralyzed transporters, impacting Russia’s ability to export its products.

• Was the Ukrainian grain export part of the deal successful?

  The part of the deal aimed at exporting Ukrainian grain was considered more successful, but Russia refused to extend it due to ongoing issues with its own agricultural trade.

What are your thoughts on the collapse of the Black Sea grain Initiative and its potential impact on global food security? Share your views in the comments below or share this article with your network.

How do Russian officials specifically claim Western sanctions impede their agricultural exports?

The Collapse of the Black Sea Grain Initiative: A Timeline

Russia has repeatedly asserted that Western sanctions are directly responsible for the failure to renew the Black Sea Grain Initiative, a UN-brokered deal that allowed for the safe export of Ukrainian grain through the Black Sea. This deal, crucial for global food security, officially ended on July 17, 2023, and attempts to revive it have so far been unsuccessful. The situation has escalated in 2025, with Russia consistently blaming obstacles to its own agricultural exports as the primary reason for suspending cooperation.

here’s a breakdown of key events and Russian grievances:

July 2022: The initial agreement, brokered by the UN and Turkey, was signed, easing a global food crisis exacerbated by the war in Ukraine. this allowed for the export of approximately 33 million tonnes of grain and foodstuffs.

May 2023: Russia began voicing strong concerns about the implementation of the deal, claiming promises to remove obstacles to its own food and fertilizer exports were not being met. Specifically, issues related to banking, insurance, and access to ports were cited.

July 17, 2023: Russia suspended its participation in the Black Sea Grain Initiative.

Ongoing (2024-2025): Russia continues to link the resumption of the grain deal to the easing of sanctions impacting its agricultural sector. Moscow argues that sanctions hinder its ability to export fertilizers, a critical component of global agriculture.

Specific Sanctions Russia Claims are Problematic

Russia’s complaints aren’t simply broad accusations. They pinpoint specific areas where sanctions are allegedly creating roadblocks:

1. Banking Restrictions: Sanctions imposed on Russian banks, including restrictions on SWIFT access, make it difficult to process payments for Russian agricultural exports. This impacts buyers’ willingness to engage in trade.
2. Insurance and Reinsurance: The cost of insuring ships traveling to and from Russian ports has skyrocketed due to sanctions-related risks. Reinsurance is also proving difficult to obtain, further increasing costs.
3. Port access: Restrictions on access to European ports for Russian vessels, even those carrying fertilizers, are cited as a important impediment.
4. Supply Chain Disruptions: Sanctions on components needed for agricultural machinery and fertilizers are disrupting Russia’s production capacity.
5. Financial Transactions: Complicated and lengthy processes for financial transactions related to food and fertilizer exports, even when technically permitted, create significant delays and discourage trade.

Global Impact and Food Security Concerns

The termination of the Black Sea Grain Initiative has had a tangible impact on global food prices and food security, especially in developing nations reliant on Ukrainian and Russian grain.

Wheat Prices: Following the deal’s collapse, global wheat prices experienced a noticeable increase, impacting import-dependent countries.

Vulnerable Nations: Countries in Africa, the Middle East, and asia, which heavily relied on Ukrainian grain to feed their populations, are particularly vulnerable to price fluctuations and supply disruptions.The World Food Program (WFP) has expressed concerns about the increased risk of hunger and malnutrition.

Choice Routes: Efforts to establish alternative export routes for Ukrainian grain, such as through the Danube River and overland routes via the EU, have faced logistical challenges and capacity constraints.

Fertilizer Shortages: Reduced Russian fertilizer exports contribute to higher fertilizer prices globally, possibly impacting crop yields in various regions.

Western Counterarguments and Perspectives

Western governments maintain that sanctions are not intended to target food and fertilizer exports, and that exemptions are in place to allow these critical supplies to reach global markets. They argue that Russia is using food as a weapon, deliberately creating instability to exert political pressure.

Sanctions Exemptions: The US, EU, and UK have all issued guidance clarifying that sanctions do not prohibit the trade of food, fertilizer, and related goods.

Russia’s export Capacity: Western officials point to data suggesting that Russia continues to export significant volumes of wheat, despite the sanctions.

Alternative Suppliers: Efforts are underway to diversify grain supply sources and increase production in other regions to mitigate the impact of the Black Sea situation.

Focus on Russian Actions: Many Western leaders emphasize that russia’s withdrawal from the deal and attacks on Ukrainian port infrastructure are the primary drivers of the current crisis.

The Role of the United Nations and Turkey

The UN and Turkey continue to play a crucial role in attempting to mediate a solution and revive the Black Sea Grain Initiative.

Ongoing Negotiations: The UN Secretary-General has repeatedly engaged with both Russia and Ukraine to find a way to resume the deal.

Turkish Mediation: Turkey, as a key regional player, has also been actively involved in diplomatic efforts.

Alternative Proposals: discussions are ongoing regarding potential alternative arrangements that could address Russia’s concerns while ensuring the continued flow of Ukrainian grain.

**Focus on Humanitarian Needs