Russian Military Critic Accuses Kremlin of Deliberately Destroying Soldiers
A Russian military correspondent, known for his staunch support of the Kremlin’s war effort, has leveled shocking accusations against the Russian government, alleging a deliberate scheme to sabotage its own troops on the battlefield in Ukraine. Mikhail Polynkov, a self-described “Z-patriot,” launched a scathing attack on Moscow’s military leadership, accusing them of knowingly undermining the war effort and ensuring the deaths of Russian soldiers.
Polynkov focused his ire on a seemingly bureaucratic yet devastating policy implemented by the Russian Ministry of Defense. The Ministry instituted a strict rule forbidding soldiers from using any vehicles unless they were explicitly registered with the army. Polynkov argued that this policy effectively rendered a vast amount of readily available transportation useless, crippling logistical operations and endangering troops on the front lines.
“A huge part of the transport of our armed forces has become dead weight,” Polynkov declared. “There is transport, but it cannot be used. This is a big problem! There is no transport to bring ammunition, food, to bring the assault group to ‘zero’ (frontline), to take the wounded from the battlefield. This was all done using volunteer and personal transport! As the soldiers say, this is shooting in the legs from behind! They’re shooting at their own people! It’s not clear to me. Why does the enemy not care what kind of transport his military personnel travel in, or whether they use smartphones or not? But here we are…Probably the enemy is at war, they are fighting and using any means. And it turns out that we have ‘SVO.’ Now, during hostilities, this is really sabotage and sabotage. It’s a crime.”
Polynkov’s accusations went beyond mere criticism of logistical blunders, venturing into the realm of conspiracy and betrayal. He claimed that the Kremlin’s ultimate goal was not victory in Ukraine but rather to minimize the number of soldiers returning home alive.
“Returning from the war, the Russian military will become even more redundant and embittered if they survive,” Polynkov asserted. “Therefore, as I understand it, they are doing everything to ensure that no one returns from the war.”
Polinkov’s testimony, delivered through his online platforms, has sent shockwaves through pro-war Russian circles. His blunt, unvarnished criticism of the Kremlin’s tactics has ignited debate and fueled growing dissent amongst those who had previously unwavering faith in the war effort. As the conflict drags on with no clear end in sight, voices like Polynkov’s are becoming increasingly prominent, forcing a confrontation with the harsh realities of the war and the potentially devastating consequences for Russia itself.
Whispers of Discontent
Polynkov’s pronouncements are part of a larger trend emerging from within the pro-war camp.
While many ardent supporters of the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine remain steadfast in their beliefs, a growing number of influential voices are voicing concerns about the conduct of the war and questioning the official narrative.
Predictions of an imminent freeze in the fighting have surfaced from military correspondents like Kalashnikov, while others have openly criticized President Vladimir Putin for prolonging the conflict. The phrase “Something is going in the wrong steppe” has become a coded way to express dissatisfaction with the war effort without explicitly challenging the government.
These dissenting voices, while still a minority, point to a possible shift in public sentiment, even within the traditionally staunch pro-war faction. The Kremlin’s grip on information continues to hold sway over much of the Russian population, but the cracks are beginning to show, and the repercussions of Polynkov’s accusations could be far-reaching.
What is the evidence presented by Mikhail Polynkov to support his accusations of Russian sabotage?
## Interview with Military Analyst on Accusations of Russian Sabotage
**Host:** We’re joined today by Dr. Anya Petrova, a leading expert on the Russian military, to discuss a shocking claim made by military correspondent Mikhail Polynkov. Dr. Petrova, Polynkov, a known supporter of the Kremlin’s war effort, has accused the Russian government of deliberately sabotaging its own troops in Ukraine. Can you elaborate on these allegations?
**Dr. Petrova:** It is indeed a stunning accusation. Polynkov is claiming that a policy by the Russian Ministry of Defense, barring soldiers from using unregistered vehicles, is intentionally hindering logistical support on the frontlines, ultimately leading to unnecessary casualties. He argues this policy renders a significant amount of available transport unusable, impacting the delivery of essential supplies and the evacuation of wounded soldiers.
**Host:** This seems like a logistical issue rather than a deliberate act of sabotage.
**Dr. Petrova:** That’s precisely the question. Polynkov believes this specific policy, coupled with other restrictive measures, points to a deliberate attempt to undermine the war effort and minimize the number of soldiers returning home alive. He’s framing it as a betrayal by the Kremlin.
**Host:** A very serious accusation. What evidence does Polynkov offer to support such a claim?
**Dr. Petrova:** He primarily relies on anecdotal evidence from soldiers on the frontlines who describe a dire situation with inadequate logistical support. However, he doesn’t provide concrete proof of a deliberate plot. Many experts remain skeptical, attributing the transportation issues to bureaucratic inefficiencies and shortcomings in military preparedness rather than a calculated act of sabotage.
**Host:** What are the potential implications of these accusations, regardless of their veracity?
**Dr. Petrova:** The accusations could further erode trust in the Russian military leadership and fuel internal dissent amongst the ranks. It also adds fuel to the inherent uncertainties and controversies surrounding the war’s conduct and objectives. It’s vital to investigate these claims thoroughly and determine the actual reasons behind these logistical challenges.
**Host:** Dr. Petrova, thank you for shedding light on this complex and concerning situation.
**Dr. Petrova:** You’re welcome.
