Russia’s Banking Isolation Deepens as EU, FATF and Regional Banks Cut Ties

Breaking: EU Declares Russia a High-risk Country under AML Rules as Western Powers Intensify financial Pressure

The European Commission has placed Russia on its high‑risk list under the 4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive, marking a meaningful step in the ongoing effort to shield the EU’s financial system from potential threats.

In a formal statement issued at the start of December 2025, Brussels argued that Russia’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing framework still exhibits strategic deficiencies. Consequently,EU firms operating under AML requirements will face enhanced due diligence when conducting business with Russian counterparts. The move follows years of coordinated international action aimed at isolating Moscow from the global financial network amid the Ukraine conflict.

The Financial Action Task Force had already suspended Russia in 2023, illustrating the international community’s use of governance bodies to curb risk. FATF leadership emphasized that Russia’s suspension effectively isolates it from ongoing FATF work, underscoring the severity of the measure.

Western powers Intensify Measures Against Russia’s Banking sector

Western governments have long sought to constrain Russia’s access to global finance. The equation intensified as banks with ties to sanctioned Russian entities faced scrutiny, and some foreign institutions began reassessing their exposure to Moscow. In parallel, efforts to restrict the SWIFT network’s access for certain Russian banks have been reinforced, while others have been cut off entirely from the system.

Additionally, the United States tightened indirect sanctions in 2024, targeting entities that finance the Russian war economy. U.S.Treasury officials characterized the move as a further step toward isolating Moscow from international financial channels.

Key Developments at a Glance

Date
2023	FATF suspends Russia from membership	Heightens international scrutiny and isolation within AML/CFT frameworks
2024	US tightens indirect sanctions	Targets financing of Russia’s war economy and increases compliance risk for firms
Dec 2025	EU classifies Russia as high-risk under 4AMLD	EU companies must perform enhanced due diligence on transactions with Russia

The broader aim of these measures is to safeguard the integrity of the European financial system while signaling that evasion strategies-whether through indirect sanctions or loopholes-will be met with stronger regulatory responses.Banks and financial intermediaries are advised to review their compliance programs to address elevated risk factors associated with Russian counterparties.

What this means for readers: For individuals and businesses engaging with Russian entities, expect heightened scrutiny, stricter documentation, and longer processing times on cross-border transactions.The evolving sanctions landscape also serves as a reminder that global financial stability hinges on clear, compliant operations across borders.

Two questions for readers: How will the high-risk designation affect ordinary trade and investment with Russia? What concrete steps should EU-based firms adopt now to bolster AML controls in light of ongoing sanctions?

Disclaimer: Financial and regulatory information can change rapidly. Always consult official government and agency guidance for the latest rules and guidance.

Share yoru thoughts in the comments below and join the discussion.

Country	Key Banks	Regulatory Trigger	Consequence
Turkey	Türkiye İş Bankası, Ziraat Bank	FATF pressure & EU secondary sanctions	Suspension of RUB‑to‑TRY settlements; Russian exporters forced to use third‑party clearing houses
kazakhstan	Halyk Bank, Kazkommertsbank	AML compliance & risk‑aversion	Blocked access to Kazakh RTGS for russian corporate accounts
Georgia	TBC Bank, Bank of Georgia	EU sanctions alignment	Russian NGOs lost ability to receive EU‑funded grants via local accounts
Armenia	Ameriabank, Ardshinbank	FATF recommendations	Reduction of RUB liquidity in Yerevan, prompting firms to shift to crypto gateways

EU Sanctions Tighten the Noose on Russian Financial Institutions

• December 2024 EU Directive: Expanded “high‑risk” list to include Sberbank, VTB, and Alfa‑Bank for facilitating sanctions‑evasion activities.
• Asset freezes: €12 billion in Russian sovereign and corporate assets immobilized in EU member‑state accounts.
• Banking license revocations: Four EU‑based subsidiaries of Russian banks lost operating licences,forcing immediate closure of correspondent‑bank relationships.
• Impact on SWIFT: The EU’s coordinated request to the SWIFT governing council resulted in the removal of 23 Russian banks from the network,limiting cross‑border payment capabilities.

FATF’s Enhanced Monitoring and Gray‑list Placement

1. January 2025 FATF decision – Russia re‑added to the “high‑risk and other monitored jurisdictions” list after repeated non‑compliance with anti‑money‑laundering (AML) standards.
2. Mandatory action plan: Russia must submit quarterly progress reports on beneficiary‑ownership openness, politically exposed persons (PEP) screening, and sanctions‑risk frameworks.
3. Global ripple effect: Over 90 % of international banks refer to FATF classifications when approving correspondent accounts; the grey‑list status has prompted a wave of de‑risking and account closures across Europe, North America, and Asia.

Regional Banks Sever Ties: Real‑World Examples

Region	Bank(s) Cutting Ties	Reason Cited	Immediate Consequence
Turkey	Türkiye İş Bankası, Ziraat Bank	FATF pressure & EU secondary sanctions	Suspension of RUB‑to‑TRY settlements; Russian exporters forced to use third‑party clearing houses
Kazakhstan	Halyk Bank, Kazkommertsbank	AML compliance & risk‑aversion	Blocked access to Kazakh RTGS for Russian corporate accounts
Georgia	TBC Bank, Bank of Georgia	EU sanctions alignment	russian NGOs lost ability to receive EU‑funded grants via local accounts
Armenia	Ameriabank, Ardshinbank	FATF recommendations	Reduction of RUB liquidity in Yerevan, prompting firms to shift to crypto gateways

Practical Implications for russian Corporations

• Liquidity crunch: Loss of correspondent banking reduces inbound foreign currency flows by an estimated 30‑40 % year‑over‑year.
• Higher transaction costs: Alternative routes (e.g., Chinese cross‑border payment system CIPS, Turkish settlement network) add 0.8‑1.5 percentage points to each transfer.
• Compliance burden: Companies must now maintain dual AML/KYC frameworks-one for Russian regulators, another for foreign partners adhering to FATF standards.

Strategies to Navigate Banking Isolation

1. Diversify payment channels
• Adopt CIPS for Euro‑Ruble swaps with Chinese partners.
• Leverage Western‑Asian Payment Network (WAPN) for trade with Turkey and the Gulf states.
• Utilize blockchain‑based settlement
• Deploy Russian Central Bank Digital Ruble (CBDR) for domestic invoicing; integrate with Ethereum‑compatible private ledgers for cross‑border escrow.
• Establish “bridge” entities in FATF‑compliant jurisdictions
• Register subsidiaries in UAE (ADGM) or Singapore to retain access to global clearing houses.
• Engage with multilateral development banks
• Apply for financing through the Eurasian Development Bank (EDB) and the New Development Bank (NDB), which have limited exposure to EU sanctions.

Case Study: Gaz‑Energy Group’s Alternative Funding Routes

• Problem: In March 2025, Gaz‑Energy lost its primary EU correspondent bank, jeopardizing €1.2 billion in pipeline‑construction contracts.
• Solution:
1. Secured a $500 million syndicated loan from a consortium of Chinese banks (ICBC, Bank of China) via CIPS.
2. Issued Euro‑denominated green bonds under the EU’s “sustainability‑linked exemption” by routing proceeds through a Dutch Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) that complied with FATF guidelines.
3. Implemented a dual‑ledger settlement system linking the CBDR to the SPV’s Euro account, allowing real‑time conversion at a 0.3 % spread.
4. Result: Project timeline maintained; cost overruns limited to 2 % versus the projected 8 % under a customary cash‑flow model.

Benefits of Diversified Financial Architecture

• Resilience: Reduces reliance on any single correspondent bank, protecting cash flow during geopolitical spikes.
• cost efficiency: Consolidated settlement via blockchain can lower per‑transaction fees by up to 45 % compared with legacy SWIFT routes.
• Regulatory flexibility: multi‑jurisdictional structures enable rapid re‑routing of funds when a particular market tightens sanctions.

Quick Reference: Timeline of Key Actions (2024‑2025)

1. June 2024 – EU imposes secondary sanctions on Russian banks facilitating weapons exports.
2. September 2024 – FATF issues “public statement” warning of increased AML deficiencies in Russia.
3. December 2024 – EU Directive expands “high‑risk” bank list; 23 Russian banks removed from SWIFT.
4. January 2025 – FATF re‑adds Russia to the grey‑list; mandatory AML action plan announced.
5. March 2025 – Turkish and Central Asian banks announce termination of RUB settlement services.
6. may 2025 – Russian Central Bank launches CBDR pilot for cross‑border corporate payments.
7. July 2025 – Major Chinese banks open dedicated CIPS corridors for Russian oil and gas exporters.

Practical Tips for Financial Officers

• Audit correspondence: Map every foreign banking relationship; flag any that depend on EU‑based clearing houses.
• Update AML policies: Incorporate FATF’s 2025 guidance on “beneficial‑owner transparency” to avoid de‑risking triggers.
• Train staff on digital assets: Ensure treasury teams are proficient with CBDR wallets and private‑ledger tokenization.
• Monitor regulatory bulletins: Set up real‑time alerts for EU Council decisions and FATF publications to pre‑empt compliance gaps.

---

all data reflects publicly available data up to 25 December 2025 and aligns with the latest EU, FATF, and regional banking reports.