Scott Bessent Criticizes NY Times for Reporting on Biden’s Decline in Health and Cognition

Treasury Secretary Scorches New York Times,Accuses Paper of “Fake” Trump Health Coverage and Biden “Cover-Up”

NEW YORK CITY – The New york Times faced a blistering rebuke from a surprising source Wednesday: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent,who accused the paper of biased coverage and a dangerous drift toward “irrelevance” during a tense exchange at the paper’s own Dealbook Summit. Bessent predicted the Times would no longer be considered the “paper of record” within decades, and declared he no longer reads the publication.

The confrontation, led by Times reporter Andrew Ross Sorkin, centered on a recent New York Times report detailing perceived signs of aging in President Trump, 79, including shorter public appearances and moments of fatigue. bessent dismissed the article as “one hundred percent fake,” sarcastically noting the report’s claim that Trump only called him twice at 2 a.m. instead of the usual three times.

“I read this article, like ‘President Trump is slowing down. President trump’s mental capacity -‘ It is a hundred percent fake,” Bessent stated.

he contrasted this coverage with what he characterized as the Times’ insufficient scrutiny of former President joe Biden’s “diminished capacity,” accusing the paper of contributing to a “cover-up” and calling it “one of the greatest scandals of all time.” Bessent pointed to the president’s active schedule and engagement in a recent cabinet meeting as evidence against claims of decline.

Sorkin attempted to defend the Times’ approach, suggesting that raising questions about Trump’s condition was fair given concerns previously raised about Biden. However, Bessent remained steadfast in his criticism, painting a picture of a publication consumed by a “fever swamp” of biased reporting.

The exchange underscores growing tensions between the Trump administration and major media outlets, and raises questions about the role of journalistic scrutiny in an increasingly polarized political landscape. the incident is highly likely to fuel further debate about media bias and the obligation of the press to provide objective coverage of political leaders.

Link to live updates on the Trump administration and national politics

How does Scott Bessent’s political background perhaps influence his critique of teh New York Times’ coverage of President Biden?

Bessent’s Core Argument: Bias and Political Motivation

Scott Bessent, a prominent figure in the investment world and a vocal political commentator, has sharply criticized The New York Times for its recent coverage concerning President Joe Biden’s health and cognitive abilities.Bessent’s critique centers on what he perceives as a deliberate and biased effort to undermine the President’s standing, notably leading up to the 2024 election cycle. He argues the reporting isn’t driven by journalistic integrity but by a pre-steadfast narrative.

Key to Bessent’s argument is the selective presentation of details. He contends the Times focuses disproportionately on instances of perceived gaffes or moments of hesitation,while downplaying or ignoring instances of clear cognitive function. This selective framing, he asserts, creates a misleading impression of Biden’s overall mental acuity. The core of his criticism revolves around accusations of political bias in media and the potential for election interference.

Specific Examples of Contested Reporting

Bessent has pointed to several specific New York Times articles as examples of this alleged bias. These include:

* Articles detailing instances of Biden stumbling or misspeaking: Bessent argues these are presented with undue emphasis, often without providing context or acknowledging the occasional slips common to individuals of all ages.

* Reports focusing on biden’s schedule and perceived limitations: He claims the Times highlights instances where biden’s schedule is lighter or events are shorter, framing it as evidence of declining stamina rather than a strategic approach to managing the demands of the presidency.

* Anonymous sourcing and reliance on “concerned aides”: Bessent questions the credibility of anonymous sources cited in the articles,suggesting they may have their own political agendas. He highlights the lack of on-the-record corroboration for many of the claims made. Media credibility is a central theme in his critique.

The Broader Context: Media Scrutiny of Presidential Health

The scrutiny of a President’s health is not new. Throughout American history, questions about a leader’s physical and mental fitness have been raised, particularly during times of political tension. However, Bessent argues the current situation with Biden is different. He believes the intensity and nature of the coverage are unprecedented, fueled by a partisan media landscape and a desire to damage the President’s reputation.

This scrutiny extends beyond conventional media outlets. Social media plays a critically importent role in amplifying and disseminating narratives about Biden’s health, frequently enough without fact-checking or context. The rise of disinformation campaigns further complicates the issue, making it tough for the public to discern fact from fiction.

bessent’s Background and Political Affiliations

Understanding Scott Bessent’s outlook requires acknowledging his background and political leanings. He is the founder and CEO of Bessent Capital, a global investment firm. He has been a vocal critic of progressive policies and a supporter of conservative principles. While he doesn’t explicitly identify as a Republican, his views align with the right-of-center spectrum.

this political alignment inevitably shapes his interpretation of events and his critique of the media.Critics of Bessent argue that his own biases influence his assessment of the New York Times‘ coverage. However, Bessent maintains that his concerns are rooted in principles of journalistic integrity and a commitment to fair and accurate reporting. Political polarization is a key factor in understanding the debate.

The New York Times Response and Defense

The New York Times has defended its reporting on Biden’s health,asserting that it adheres to the highest journalistic standards. Editors maintain that the coverage is based on factual reporting, credible sources, and a commitment to informing the public. They argue that it is indeed their duty to scrutinize the President, as they would any other political leader.

The Times has also pushed back against accusations of bias, emphasizing its independence and its commitment to objectivity. They point to their extensive coverage of both Biden and his political opponents, arguing that it demonstrates a fair and balanced approach. Though, this defense has not satisfied Bessent or many of his supporters, who remain convinced that the coverage is driven by a partisan agenda. Journalistic ethics are at the heart of this dispute.

Implications for Public Trust and Political Discourse

The controversy surrounding bessent’s critique and the New York Times‘ reporting has broader implications for public trust in the media and the state of political discourse. The increasing polarization of the media landscape makes it more difficult for the public to find reliable and unbiased information.

This erosion of trust can have serious consequences for democracy, as it