Special Counsel Investigates Jack Smith, Trump Probe Lead

Investigation Launched into Former Special Counsel Jack Smith

U.S. officials have reportedly opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who spearheaded two federal criminal cases against President Donald Trump. the Office of the Special Counsel is examining allegations that Smith may have violated the Hatch Act, a law that restricts federal employees from engaging in political activities while in their official capacity.

The inquiry reportedly stems from a request by Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who sought to determine if Smith’s actions were intended to influence the 2024 presidential election. The Office of the Special Counsel, tasked with monitoring the conduct of federal employees, has not yet commented on the matter.

Smith was appointed special counsel in 2022 adn subsequently brought charges against President Trump for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2020 election results and for mishandling classified documents after leaving office. Trump has consistently denied these charges,characterizing them as politically motivated attacks orchestrated by a weaponized Justice Department.

Neither of the cases against Trump proceeded to trial. Following trump’s victory in the November 2024 presidential election, the special counsel’s office, adhering to a Department of Justice policy that prohibits prosecuting a sitting president, dropped both cases. Smith subsequently resigned shortly before Trump could fulfill a campaign promise to terminate his employment.

It is important to note that the Office of the Special Counsel operates independently of Department of Justice special counsel offices, such as the one previously lead by Smith. Decisions made by Smith during his prosecutorial tenure generally fall outside the purview of this oversight body. While the Office of the Special Counsel cannot bring criminal charges against Smith, it possesses the authority to refer its findings to the Department of Justice, which can then pursue legal action. The most significant penalty under the Hatch Act is termination of employment, which is no longer applicable to Smith given his resignation.

This development occurs amidst a period where the Trump administration has implemented several measures against perceived political adversaries as taking office in January. These actions have included the revocation of security clearances and protective details for former officials,targeting law firms involved in previous cases against him,and the withdrawal of federal funding from universities. Earlier this month, the FBI initiated criminal investigations into its former director, James Comey, and ex-CIA chief John Brennan, both prominent critics of Trump. Days later, Maurene Comey, daughter of James Comey and a federal prosecutor, was abruptly dismissed from her position.

What ancient precedents exist for investigating the actions of special counsels themselves, and how might those cases inform the current inquiry into Jack Smith?

the Scope of the Investigation

A special counsel investigation is now focused on jack Smith, the lead prosecutor overseeing the federal cases against former President Donald trump. This progress marks a significant turn in the ongoing legal battles surrounding Trump’s actions before, during, and after his presidency. The investigation, confirmed by sources close to the Justice Department in late July 2025, centers on allegations of potential conflicts of interest and improper conduct by Smith and his team.

The core of the inquiry revolves around claims made by Trump’s legal team regarding Smith’s past political donations and public statements perceived as demonstrating bias. Specifically, scrutiny is being applied to donations Smith’s wife made to political organizations supporting President Biden. while legally permissible, these contributions have fueled accusations of a politically motivated prosecution.

Key Allegations and Concerns

Several key allegations are driving the special counsel’s investigation:

Political Bias: Trump’s lawyers argue that Smith’s wife’s donations demonstrate a clear bias against the former president, undermining the impartiality of the prosecution. They contend this bias taints the entire investigation and warrants dismissal of the charges.

Public Statements: Smith’s prior public statements regarding Trump and the January 6th investigation are also under review. Critics point to these statements as evidence of pre-judgment and a lack of objectivity.

Potential Conflicts of Interest: The investigation will assess whether any undisclosed conflicts of interest existed within Smith’s team that could have influenced the handling of the cases.

Handling of Evidence: Concerns have been raised regarding the handling of classified documents and the presentation of evidence in the Mar-a-Lago documents case. The special counsel will examine whether proper protocols were followed.

The Players Involved

The appointment of a special counsel to investigate Smith is itself a noteworthy event. The Justice Department, under Attorney General Merrick Garland, took this step to ensure impartiality and address concerns about potential political interference.

Jack Smith: The Special Counsel originally appointed to investigate Trump’s handling of classified documents and his role in the January 6th Capitol attack. His background includes extensive experience prosecuting war crimes at the International Criminal Court.

Merrick Garland: The Attorney General who authorized the special counsel investigation into Smith, emphasizing the need for an independent review.

the Special Counsel (Name Withheld): The identity of the special counsel leading the investigation into Smith has been kept confidential to maintain the integrity of the process.

Donald Trump: The former president and the subject of the original investigations led by Jack Smith.

Legal Implications and Potential Outcomes

The outcome of this investigation could have far-reaching legal implications.

1. Dismissal of Charges: If the special counsel finds evidence of significant misconduct or bias, it could lead to the dismissal of the charges against Trump.
2. Disciplinary Action: Smith or members of his team could face disciplinary action from the Justice Department or state bar associations.
3. Changes to Investigative Procedures: The investigation may prompt the Justice Department to revise its procedures for appointing special counsels and handling politically sensitive cases.
4. Impact on Public Trust: The investigation’s findings will likely have a significant impact on public trust in the Justice Department and the integrity of the legal system.

Timeline of Events

November 2022: Jack smith appointed as Special Counsel.

June 2023: Trump indicted on federal charges related to classified documents.

August 2023: Trump indicted on federal charges related to the January 6th Capitol attack.

July 2025: Allegations of bias and conflicts of interest surface, prompting calls for an investigation into Smith.

Late July 2025: Attorney General Garland appoints a special counsel to investigate Jack Smith.

August 2025 (Ongoing): The special counsel investigation is underway, wiht interviews and document reviews taking place.

Related Search Terms & Keywords

Jack Smith investigation

Trump indictment

Special Counsel

department of Justice

Political bias

Conflict of interest

January 6th investigation

Mar-a-Lago documents

Merrick Garland

Donald trump legal battles

Federal prosecution

Impartiality of justice

DOJ investigation

Trump classified documents case

Case Studies: Past special Counsel Investigations

Examining past special counsel investigations provides context for the current situation.

Watergate Scandal (1973-1974): The investigation led by Archibald Cox and later Leon Jaworski ultimately led to President Nixon’s resignation. This case established the precedent for using special counsels in politically sensitive investigations.

Iran-contra Affair (1986-1988): Lawrence Walsh’s investigation into the Iran-Contra scandal revealed a complex web of secret arms sales and political maneuvering.

* Kenneth Starr Investigation (1994-1998): The investigation into President bill Clinton and his relationship with Monica Lewinsky resulted in impeachment proceedings.

These cases demonstrate the significant impact special counsel investigations can have on the presidency and the political landscape. They also highlight the importance of maintaining impartiality and transparency throughout the process.