The Relentless Pursuit of Distance: How Golf Course Design is Adapting to the Modern Game
Every year, the seemingly immutable laws of golf are challenged by increasingly powerful athletes. While death and taxes remain certain, so too does the lengthening of championship golf courses. This trend isn’t just happening at new venues; it’s reshaping icons like the Old Course at St. Andrews, set for significant changes ahead of the 2027 Open Championship. A planned 132-yard extension represents the most substantial lengthening in decades, signaling a broader shift in how courses are designed and maintained to keep pace with the modern game.
Responding to Power: The St. Andrews Overhaul
Four new tee boxes are slated for the 5th, 6th, 7th, and 10th holes, adding substantial yardage. The par-5 5th will gain the most, a full 35 yards, addressing its status as the third-easiest hole during the 2022 Open. While the 6th and 7th receive more modest increases (17 and 22 yards respectively), the overall effect is a course stretching to 7,445 yards. This isn’t simply about adding length; it’s about restoring the intended challenge. As R&A Chief Governance Officer Grant Moir explained, the goal is to counter the increasing number of reachable par-4s and par-5s, particularly in calmer conditions.
Beyond Length: Strategic Bunkering and the Art of Deception
The changes at St. Andrews aren’t limited to tee box extensions. Strategic bunker placements are also being revised, particularly on the 6th and 16th holes. The addition of bunkers closer to the green on the 6th aims to punish aggressive drivers who stray offline. More intriguing is the plan for the 16th, where new bunkers will be added to the left side, coupled with a reduction in rough. This seemingly counterintuitive move, as Moir points out, is designed to enhance the strategic challenge. Players have been intentionally aiming for the left rough, finding it a comfortable lie for an approach shot. By introducing bunkers, the R&A hopes to force more difficult decisions and reward precision over brute force.
The Scheffler Effect: A Case Study in Modern Course Management
The strategy behind the 16th hole changes was directly informed by observing player behavior. During a practice round in 2022, Scottie Scheffler deliberately targeted the left rough, demonstrating a willingness to sacrifice position for a more manageable approach. This highlights a key trend: elite players are increasingly exploiting course weaknesses, forcing governing bodies to adapt. Data from the 2022 Open confirms this, showing that players found just as many birdies from the left rough on 16 as they did from the fairway, revealing a flaw in the hole’s original design.
Pace of Play and the Pressure to Speed Up the Game
The lengthening of courses isn’t solely about maintaining challenge; it’s also about addressing pace of play. The 2022 Open saw unusually slow rounds, exacerbated by calm conditions allowing players to reach holes in fewer strokes. Slower play impacts the viewing experience and creates logistical challenges for tournament organizers. Extending courses, particularly par-4s, forces players to hit longer approach shots, increasing the time between shots and alleviating congestion on the course.
A Wider Trend: The Evolution of Championship Setups
St. Andrews is not an isolated case. Mackenzie and Ebert, the firm overseeing the renovations, has been actively involved in modifying championship courses for years, including recent work at Royal Liverpool and upcoming changes at Royal Birkdale. This reflects a broader industry trend: a proactive approach to course design that anticipates and responds to the evolving capabilities of professional golfers. The challenge lies in balancing the need for increased difficulty with the preservation of a course’s inherent character and historical significance. The R&A emphasizes a “sensitive” approach, acknowledging the Old Course’s unique legacy while adapting it to the demands of the modern game.
The Future of Golf Course Design: A Balancing Act
The changes at St. Andrews, and across the championship circuit, underscore a fundamental truth: golf course design is a dynamic process. Courses aren’t static entities; they’re living organisms that must adapt to remain relevant. The relentless pursuit of distance in the modern game necessitates a continuous cycle of evaluation, modification, and innovation. While the average golfer won’t experience these changes directly during their rounds, the underlying principles – strategic bunkering, thoughtful tee placements, and a focus on pace of play – are lessons that can be applied to courses of all levels. The question isn’t whether courses will continue to evolve, but how effectively they can balance the demands of the modern game with the preservation of their unique character and historical significance. What will be the tipping point where length becomes counterproductive, and strategic design takes precedence? That’s the debate shaping the future of golf.
Explore more insights on golf course architecture and distance insights from the USGA.
