The Politicization of Pop Culture: How Trump’s Kennedy Center Choices Signal a Broader Cultural War
The lines are being redrawn, not on battlefields, but on stages and in concert halls. President Trump’s recent unveiling of the Kennedy Center honorees – Sylvester Stallone, Michael Crawford, Gloria Gaynor, George Strait, and KISS – wasn’t just a list of names; it was a deliberate provocation, a signal flare in a widening cultural conflict. This isn’t about celebrating artistic merit; it’s about weaponizing nostalgia and populist appeal, and it foreshadows a future where cultural institutions become increasingly politicized battlegrounds.
A Populist Lineup and a Deliberate Divide
The selection of these honorees, undeniably popular but arguably outside the traditional “high culture” canon, immediately sparked debate. While Stallone’s impact on cinema is undeniable, and Strait a country music icon, the choices felt pointedly anti-establishment. Trump himself admitted to purging “wokesters” from the list, framing the selection process as a direct rejection of progressive values. This isn’t accidental. It’s a calculated strategy to further solidify his base and paint himself as a champion of the “real America” against a perceived liberal elite.
This strategy isn’t new. Trump has consistently leveraged pop culture for political gain, understanding its power to connect with voters on an emotional level. He’s the “executive producer” of his own narrative, and the Kennedy Center Honors are simply the latest act in a carefully staged production. His decision to host the televised gala himself underscores this control, transforming a traditionally bipartisan event into a personal platform.
The Erosion of Bipartisan Tradition and the Rise of Cultural Warfare
Historically, the Kennedy Center Honors were curated by a non-partisan panel. Trump’s direct involvement represents a significant departure from this tradition, signaling a broader takeover of Washington institutions. This isn’t merely about aesthetics; it’s about power. By controlling who is celebrated, Trump controls the narrative, reinforcing his “Make America Great Again” message and appealing to voters who feel left behind by a changing cultural landscape. This echoes a growing sentiment among conservatives that liberal elites have systematically imposed their values on American society, a narrative Trump expertly exploits.
The anger fueling this sentiment is palpable. As seen in his rallies, Trump’s supporters respond powerfully to his rejection of “political correctness” and his embrace of figures who defy conventional norms. The “deplorables” label, intended as an insult, became a badge of honor, demonstrating the power of embracing an outsider identity. Trump’s base sees his actions at the Kennedy Center not as a takeover, but as a reclamation.
Beyond the Honors: A Broader Pattern of Cultural Control
The Kennedy Center isn’t an isolated incident. Trump’s administration has signaled a desire to exert control over cultural expression across multiple fronts. Plans to “scrub” exhibits at the Smithsonian Museum to align with his views, attempts to influence university curricula, and attacks on the media all point to a concerted effort to shape what Americans see, learn, and experience. This raises serious concerns about the erosion of artistic freedom and the potential for censorship.
The “I Will Survive” Anthem and the Trump Persona
The choices of honorees aren’t random; they reflect aspects of Trump’s own self-perception. Stallone’s tough-guy persona resonates with Trump’s image, Strait embodies a traditional American identity he seeks to emulate, and Gaynor’s “I Will Survive” is a fitting anthem for a politician who has repeatedly defied expectations and overcome scandal. Even Crawford’s role as P.T. Barnum, a master of spectacle and illusion, seems eerily prescient.
Trump’s affinity for spectacle and his ability to blur the lines between reality and performance are central to his political success. He understands the power of branding and the importance of controlling the narrative. The Kennedy Center Honors are simply another stage for his performance, another opportunity to reinforce his image as a disruptor and a champion of the people.
What’s Next: The Future of Culture in a Polarized America?
The politicization of the Kennedy Center Honors is a symptom of a larger trend: the increasing polarization of American culture. As political divisions deepen, cultural institutions will likely become more frequent targets of partisan conflict. We can expect to see continued attempts to control narratives, censor dissenting voices, and weaponize cultural symbols for political gain. This isn’t just about art; it’s about power, identity, and the future of American democracy.
The question isn’t whether Trump’s actions are unusual, but whether they represent a new normal. The precedent he’s setting – a president directly intervening in cultural selections and explicitly politicizing a traditionally non-partisan event – could have lasting consequences. The future of American culture may well depend on whether we can resist the temptation to turn art into another battleground in the ongoing culture wars. What steps can cultural institutions take to safeguard their independence and resist political interference? That’s a conversation we need to be having now.
Explore more insights on political polarization in our latest analysis.
