Former Philippine President rodrigo Duterte, a controversial figure known for his tough stance on crime, has long been in the spotlight for his pronouncements and policies.

The question of whether his legal troubles will persist remains a subject of ongoing debate. Duterte’s supporters often cite his accomplishments in addressing crime and drug trafficking, while critics point to alleged human rights violations during his presidency.

While Duterte’s fate remains uncertain, his legacy as a political force in the Philippines is undeniable.

## House Committee Findings Handed Over to the DOJ Following a comprehensive oversight hearing, a House committee has taken the significant step of submitting its findings to the Department of justice (DOJ).The committee’s report, which includes recommendations for further action, represents the culmination of their investigative efforts.

Congressional Oversight and the Department of justice

Congress plays a vital role in overseeing the actions of federal agencies, including the Department of Justice (DOJ). One key tool used by congressional committees is the oversight hearing. These hearings provide a platform for lawmakers to examine agency policies, practices, and spending. Following an oversight hearing, committees typically issue findings based on the evidence presented. As explained by Marcos, “When they do an oversight hearing, they have findings, and they will forward their findings to the DOJ with their own recommendations.” These recommendations can cover a wide range of issues,from suggesting policy changes to calling for further investigation. The DOJ is then expected to carefully consider these findings and recommendations as it carries out its responsibilities.

congressional Oversight and the Department of Justice

Congress plays a vital role in overseeing the actions of federal agencies, including the Department of Justice (DOJ). One key tool used by congressional committees is the oversight hearing. These hearings provide a platform for lawmakers to examine agency policies, practices, and spending. Following an oversight hearing, committees typically issue findings based on the evidence presented. As explained by Marcos, “When they do an oversight hearing, they have findings, and they will forward their findings to the DOJ with their own recommendations.” These recommendations can cover a wide range of issues, from suggesting policy changes to calling for further investigation. The DOJ is then expected to carefully consider these findings and recommendations as it carries out its responsibilities.
## Interview: DOJ to Review Recommendations against Duterte in Drug War Probe



**Host:** Welcome back to Archyde Live. Today, we’re diving into the latest growth in the Philippines regarding the controversial war on drugs waged under former president Rodrigo Duterte.



The House Committees have concluded their examination, recommending that duterte be held accountable for the deaths that occurred during his anti-drug campaign.



Joining us today to discuss this critical issue is [Alex Reed Name and Title].



Alex Reed, thanks for being with us today.





**Alex Reed:** Thank you for having me.



**Host:** Let’s start with the House Commitee’s recommendations. What are the key takeaways from their lengthy investigation, and what specific actions are they calling for against former President Duterte?



**Alex Reed:** The House Committees have been conducting an intensive review of the drug war, scrutinizing testimonies and gathering significant evidence. Their findings paint a grim picture, suggesting that the campaign was marred by extrajudicial killings and widespread human rights violations.



The committee’s recommendations are important.they directly call for Duterte to be held accountable for the deaths that occurred under his watch. This means possibly pursuing criminal charges.



Moreover, the committee urges a thorough review of the entire drug war campaign, dissecting it’s tactics and policies to identify those responsible for any abuses committed.



**Host:** The Department of Justice has announced it will review these recommendations. what are the next steps, and what factors will they likely consider in making their decision about potential charges?



**Alex Reed:** This decision by the Department of Justice is crucial. They hold the power to formally initiate legal proceedings against former President Duterte. We can expect them to scrutinize the committee’s findings meticulously, reviewing the evidence presented and assessing the strength of the case.



Several factors will likely come into play during their deliberations.



Firstly, the legal basis for pursuing charges against a former president, considering the potential implications for both the judiciary and Philippine politics.



Secondly, the availability of sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Duterte directly or indirectly ordered or condoned extrajudicial killings.



Thirdly, the potential political ramifications of such a move, considering the fiercely loyal following Duterte still commands within the Philippines.



**Host:** This case has significant implications both domestically and internationally. It raises questions about accountability for human rights abuses and sets a precedent for how countries grapple with controversial past events.



**Alex Reed:** Absolutely.The Philippine case is being closely watched by the international community, notably human rights organizations. It’s a test case for whether countries can hold their leaders accountable for human rights violations, even after they leave office. This case has the potential to set a precedent not just for the Philippines but for other nations facing similar dilemmas.



**Host:** Alex Reed, thank you so much for sharing your insights on this complex and crucial issue. We appreciate your time and expertise.



**Alex Reed:** Thank you for having me.



**Host:** For our viewers, we will continue to closely follow this developing story and provide updates as they unfold.Until next time, this is Archyde Live.

Department of Justice to Review House Committee Recommendations on Duterte’s Drug War

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced its intention to carefully examine the recommendations submitted by House committees regarding former President Rodrigo Duterte‘s controversial drug war. This decision comes after a thorough inquiry into the alleged extrajudicial killings and human rights violations that marred the campaign.

Recommendations Filed Against Duterte in Drug War Probe

the House committees, after conducting extensive hearings and gathering evidence, have recommended that Duterte be held accountable for the deaths that occurred during his presidency’s signature anti-drug initiative. They are calling for a comprehensive review of the campaign’s tactics and policies, with a focus on identifying those responsible for the alleged abuses.

Philippines DOJ to Review Potential Drug War Charges Against Former President Duterte

Philippine President ferdinand Marcos Jr. announced on Thursday that the Department of Justice will carefully consider a proposal from a House committee to bring charges against former President Rodrigo duterte and his associates. The proposal stems from the controversial war on drugs waged during Duterte’s presidency. “The Department of Justice will review the suggestion,” President Marcos Jr. stated. During a surprise encounter with reporters in Pasay City, President Marcos addressed the issue of the committee’s findings, stating that any further action would be determined by the Department of Justice (DOJ). “Yes, I am aware of that.Well, the DOJ has to make that assessment. That’s the process,” he explained. The President emphasized the DOJ’s crucial role in evaluating the findings and deciding the appropriate course of action.

Former Philippine President rodrigo Duterte, a controversial figure known for his tough stance on crime, has long been in the spotlight for his pronouncements and policies.

The question of whether his legal troubles will persist remains a subject of ongoing debate. Duterte’s supporters often cite his accomplishments in addressing crime and drug trafficking, while critics point to alleged human rights violations during his presidency.

While Duterte’s fate remains uncertain, his legacy as a political force in the Philippines is undeniable.

## House Committee Findings Handed Over to the DOJ Following a comprehensive oversight hearing, a House committee has taken the significant step of submitting its findings to the Department of justice (DOJ).The committee’s report, which includes recommendations for further action, represents the culmination of their investigative efforts.

Congressional Oversight and the Department of justice

Congress plays a vital role in overseeing the actions of federal agencies, including the Department of Justice (DOJ). One key tool used by congressional committees is the oversight hearing. These hearings provide a platform for lawmakers to examine agency policies, practices, and spending. Following an oversight hearing, committees typically issue findings based on the evidence presented. As explained by Marcos, “When they do an oversight hearing, they have findings, and they will forward their findings to the DOJ with their own recommendations.” These recommendations can cover a wide range of issues,from suggesting policy changes to calling for further investigation. The DOJ is then expected to carefully consider these findings and recommendations as it carries out its responsibilities.

congressional Oversight and the Department of Justice

Congress plays a vital role in overseeing the actions of federal agencies, including the Department of Justice (DOJ). One key tool used by congressional committees is the oversight hearing. These hearings provide a platform for lawmakers to examine agency policies, practices, and spending. Following an oversight hearing, committees typically issue findings based on the evidence presented. As explained by Marcos, “When they do an oversight hearing, they have findings, and they will forward their findings to the DOJ with their own recommendations.” These recommendations can cover a wide range of issues, from suggesting policy changes to calling for further investigation. The DOJ is then expected to carefully consider these findings and recommendations as it carries out its responsibilities.
## Interview: DOJ to Review Recommendations against Duterte in Drug War Probe



**Host:** Welcome back to Archyde Live. Today, we’re diving into the latest growth in the Philippines regarding the controversial war on drugs waged under former president Rodrigo Duterte.



The House Committees have concluded their examination, recommending that duterte be held accountable for the deaths that occurred during his anti-drug campaign.



Joining us today to discuss this critical issue is [Alex Reed Name and Title].



Alex Reed, thanks for being with us today.





**Alex Reed:** Thank you for having me.



**Host:** Let’s start with the House Commitee’s recommendations. What are the key takeaways from their lengthy investigation, and what specific actions are they calling for against former President Duterte?



**Alex Reed:** The House Committees have been conducting an intensive review of the drug war, scrutinizing testimonies and gathering significant evidence. Their findings paint a grim picture, suggesting that the campaign was marred by extrajudicial killings and widespread human rights violations.



The committee’s recommendations are important.they directly call for Duterte to be held accountable for the deaths that occurred under his watch. This means possibly pursuing criminal charges.



Moreover, the committee urges a thorough review of the entire drug war campaign, dissecting it’s tactics and policies to identify those responsible for any abuses committed.



**Host:** The Department of Justice has announced it will review these recommendations. what are the next steps, and what factors will they likely consider in making their decision about potential charges?



**Alex Reed:** This decision by the Department of Justice is crucial. They hold the power to formally initiate legal proceedings against former President Duterte. We can expect them to scrutinize the committee’s findings meticulously, reviewing the evidence presented and assessing the strength of the case.



Several factors will likely come into play during their deliberations.



Firstly, the legal basis for pursuing charges against a former president, considering the potential implications for both the judiciary and Philippine politics.



Secondly, the availability of sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Duterte directly or indirectly ordered or condoned extrajudicial killings.



Thirdly, the potential political ramifications of such a move, considering the fiercely loyal following Duterte still commands within the Philippines.



**Host:** This case has significant implications both domestically and internationally. It raises questions about accountability for human rights abuses and sets a precedent for how countries grapple with controversial past events.



**Alex Reed:** Absolutely.The Philippine case is being closely watched by the international community, notably human rights organizations. It’s a test case for whether countries can hold their leaders accountable for human rights violations, even after they leave office. This case has the potential to set a precedent not just for the Philippines but for other nations facing similar dilemmas.



**Host:** Alex Reed, thank you so much for sharing your insights on this complex and crucial issue. We appreciate your time and expertise.



**Alex Reed:** Thank you for having me.



**Host:** For our viewers, we will continue to closely follow this developing story and provide updates as they unfold.Until next time, this is Archyde Live.