You are reading a sample from the Cash Only newsletter, in which the editors of SZ Byznys comment on events in Czech business every Friday. If you are interested in Cash Only, subscribe newsletter.
The US central bank, the Fed, can quickly find itself in an unusual situation. The members of the leadership who decide on interest rates and are on the Federal Free Market Committee are significantly divided in their view of the future development of interest rates. During the Fed’s December meeting, three or more committee members could be in opposition, or so-called dissent, if the U.S. central bank approves a quarter-percentage-point rate cut, as financial markets expect.
The last time such a situation occurred was at a committee meeting in 2019, and it has only happened nine times since 1990. “The Fed is significantly divided, dissent was not so common in the past,” comments Tomáš Pfeiler, portfolio manager of Cyrrus. The aforementioned committee has a total of twelve members who vote on rates.
Dissidents in the leadership of the Fed may make it more difficult for the central bank to fight inflation and excessively high unemployment. Keeping inflation at two percent and the stability of the labor market are the main goals of central bankers. A split in the leadership of the Fed can complicate the bank’s work. “It worsens the bank’s legibility. The fragmentation makes the central bank’s decisions less binding for the market,” Pfeiler points out.
Even the bankers themselves are aware of the danger of trenches in the leadership of the Fed, which may deepen. “If the ratio actually goes down to seven to five … then one person makes a different decision and the whole trajectory (of monetary policy, ed.) changes,” said board member Christopher Waller, adding: “That’s the danger of these very close one-vote results. It doesn’t give people confidence.”
Indeed, monetary policy would be significantly weakened, since a unified Fed can influence markets that adapt to what central bankers want to enforce. It will do a lot of work for them. Conversely, distrust in the Fed’s next steps and increased uncertainty due to dissidents can complicate the enforcement of monetary policy. This would, of course, have an adverse impact on the financial markets and the entire American economy, which is still fragile and is mainly kept afloat by investments in data centers due to the mania surrounding artificial intelligence.
Pfeiler is concerned that this could cause increased price growth in the US. And he is not alone. “A 7-5 split on the committee would be chaos for interest rate markets trying to determine where they will go over the next twelve to eighteen months. And it would be chaos for risk assets that need some certainty about the Fed’s strategy,” Ed Al-Hussainy, bond portfolio manager at asset manager Columbia Threadneedle, told Reuters.
The valuation of shares, bonds, real estate, but also companies depends on the interest rates set by the Fed. Changes in their development due to opposition in the Fed would cause major fluctuations in world financial markets, which would have an adverse impact not only on the American but also on the global economy.
And this at a time when US President Donald Trump wants to gain control over the Fed, which has so far resisted his desire for rapid rate cuts. His favorite for the position of the new head of the Fed, according to Bloomberg, is Kevin Hassett, Trump’s key economic adviser. Current head Jerome Powell’s mandate will end in May next year, but he can continue as a member of the central bank’s management.
Hassett is loyal to Trump and regularly defends the president’s administration’s actions on tariffs and pressure to lower interest rates in the media. Markets are therefore betting that Hassett will follow Trump’s wishes and push for looser monetary policy, which will have implications for the US economy as well as the real estate and financial markets.
More money printing at a time when there is a ton of money on the market will lead to inflation and rising prices of stocks, bonds, real estate and companies. But real estate in the US is already hardly affordable for young households. The reason for this is the constant pumping of money into the economy by the Fed, with which they try to solve all the problems of the American economy. From January 2008 to September 2025, the volume of money in the American economy (according to money supply indicators M2) increased from 7.5 to 22.3 trillion dollars. This subsequently inflates prices in shops, but also real estate and the value of companies.
If the Fed blows the whistle on money printing, miracles can really happen in the financial markets. However, poorer households, which also include Trump’s voters, would bounce back from increased inflation, which is already threatened due to import duties.
In addition, Trump’s interventions in the affairs of the US central bank are making investors nervous in government bonds. And Trump loyalist Hassett is one of the reasons. “They’re worried about undermining the Fed’s independence,” Gregory Peters, chief investment officer at PGIM Fixed Income, told Bloomberg. As a result, risk premiums and premiums that reflect the cost of money when investing in long-term versus short-term bonds are beginning to be reflected in bond yields. And not just in the US, but across the planet. This makes funding more expensive for states.
Are you interested in stock markets, energy or the plans of Czech entrepreneurs? Subscribe to Cash Only and you will receive the complete newsletter in your inbox every Friday.
Table of Contents
- 1. Okay, here’s a breakdown of the provided text, summarizing the key points and organizing them for clarity. This is essentially a market analysis focused on potential Federal reserve (Fed) actions related to Quantitative Tightening (QT) and digital currencies, and how investors/traders should respond.
- 2. cash‑Only Coup: Fed Insiders Could Stun the Markets
- 3. What a “Cash‑Only Coup” Means for the Federal Reserve
- 4. Historical precedents: Fed Moves That shocked Markets
- 5. Mechanisms Behind a Cash‑Only Shock
- 6. 1. Balance‑Sheet Contraction
- 7. 2. Liquidity Drain on Financial Institutions
- 8. 3.Interest‑Rate Implications
- 9. Potential 2025 scenarios
- 10. scenario A – Immediate Cash‑Only Clamp
- 11. Scenario B – Gradual Cash‑Only Transition
- 12. Scenario C – Partial Digital‑Currency Retraction
- 13. Benefits and Risks for Investors
- 14. Benefits
- 15. Risks
- 16. Practical Strategies for Traders
- 17. Real‑World example: 2024 Quantitative Tightening Surge
- 18. Key Indicators to Watch in Real Time
cash‑Only Coup: Fed Insiders Could Stun the Markets
What a “Cash‑Only Coup” Means for the Federal Reserve
- Definition – A cash‑only coup refers to a coordinated, behind‑the‑scenes shift by Federal Reserve officials toward a policy framework that emphasizes physical cash and high‑grade liquid assets while dramatically reducing digital‑currency exposure and quantitative easing (QE).
- Key drivers –
- inflation pressure lingering above the 2% target in 2025.
- Balance‑sheet fatigue after $9 trillion of QE and $4 trillion of quantitative tightening (QT) since 2020.
- Growing political scrutiny of the Fed’s digital‑payment initiatives (e.g., FedNow).
Primary keywords: cash‑only coup, Fed insiders, Federal Reserve policy, monetary tightening, inflation target.
LSI terms: central bank liquidity,cash reserves,balance‑sheet normalization,market shock,Fed transparency.
Historical precedents: Fed Moves That shocked Markets
| Year | Event | Market Reaction | Relevance to Cash‑Only Coup |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Unexpected 25‑bp rate hike → bond market sell‑off | S&P 500 fell 6%; Treasury yields jumped 30 bps | Shows how surprise policy shifts can trigger rapid liquidity reallocation. |
| 2008 | QE‑1 launch (fed buys $1.25 tn of assets) | Stock indices surged, credit spreads narrowed | Demonstrates the power of large‑scale asset purchases on cash flow. |
| 2022‑23 | Series of 75‑bp hikes, then QT of $300 bn/mo | Volatility spikes; “cash crunch” in high‑yield bonds | Highlights market sensitivity to cash‑draining actions. |
| 2024 (Feb) | Fed announces FedNow postponement & reduction in digital‑currency pilots | Short‑term rally in cash‑heavy money‑market funds | Direct link between cash‑centric decisions and investor positioning. |
takeaway: when Fed insiders act quietly but decisively,the ripple effect can be captured in M2 money‑supply shifts,Treasury yield curves,and equity volatility indexes (VIX).
Mechanisms Behind a Cash‑Only Shock
1. Balance‑Sheet Contraction
- Asset sell‑off: Large‑scale liquidation of Treasury securities and mortgage‑backed securities (MBS) reduces the Fed’s liquidity injection.
- Cash holdings rise: The Fed’s own cash balance climbs, effectively withdrawing cash from the banking system.
2. Liquidity Drain on Financial Institutions
- Reserve requirements: Banks lose excess reserves, tightening the overnight funding market.
- Money‑market fund flows: Investors pivot to high‑yield cash alternatives (e.g., Treasury bills, repos).
3.Interest‑Rate Implications
- Short‑term rates spike as supply of cash tightens, pushing the effective federal funds rate above target.
- Yield‑curve steepening may occur,signaling expectations of future rate hikes or prolonged QT.
SEO‑friendly terms: Fed balance sheet, QT impact, cash liquidity, short‑term rates, yield‑curve steepening.
Potential 2025 scenarios
scenario A – Immediate Cash‑Only Clamp
| Trigger | Action | Expected Market Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Fed receives inflation report showing CPI at 3.2% YoY (Feb 2025) | abrupt halt to QE; sell $500 bn of Treasury bills within 30 days | 1‑2% drop in S&P 500; Treasury yields rise 15‑20 bps; USD strengthens vs EUR/JPY. |
| Insider briefing leaked to major banks | Reserve requirement increase from 0% to 2% for large depository institutions | Money‑market spreads widen; high‑yield corporate bonds face refinancing pressure. |
Scenario B – Gradual Cash‑Only Transition
- Monthly QT of $150 bn, paired with an annual cash‑reserve target of 25% of total Fed assets.
- Market adaptation: Gradual price revelation, moderate volatility, but sector rotation toward cash‑heavy industries (Utilities, Consumer Staples).
Scenario C – Partial Digital‑Currency Retraction
- FedNow pilot suspended; CBDC research delayed.
- Result: Increased demand for physical cash and short‑term Treasury bills, boosting cash‑equivalent yields.
Keywords: 2025 Fed scenarios, cash‑only clamp, QT schedule, FedNow suspension, market impact analysis.
Benefits and Risks for Investors
Benefits
- Higher yields on cash equivalents – Treasury bills and short‑term repos become attractive.
- deflation‑hedge – Physical cash retains value when asset prices decline.
- Predictable monetary policy – Clear signal from Fed reduces policy uncertainty.
Risks
- Liquidity crunch – Banks may tighten credit, hurting corporate earnings.
- Currency volatility – USD may over‑appreciate, hurting exporters.
- Bond price depreciation – Rising yields push existing bond prices down, affecting portfolios with long‑duration exposure.
Practical tip: Maintain 15‑20% allocation in high‑quality cash equivalents (e.g., 3‑month Treasury bills) during periods of anticipated QT.
Practical Strategies for Traders
- Monitor Fed Minutes & Speeches
- Look for language like “cash‑centric” or “liquidity preservation.”
- Use tools like FedWatch to gauge probability of rate changes.
- Track Money‑Supply Metrics
- M2 growth rate: A slowdown >0.5% YoY ofen precedes cash‑tightening moves.
- Reserve balances: sudden drops indicate potential QT acceleration.
- Adjust Duration Exposure
- Shorten bond portfolio duration to 2‑3 years.
- Increase exposure to floating‑rate notes (FRNs) that benefit from rising rates.
- Deploy Tactical Cash Positions
- Use cash‑backed ETFs (e.g., SHV, BIL) for instant liquidity.
- Consider repurchase agreements (repos) for short‑term yield capture.
- sector Rotation
- Favor defensive sectors (Utilities, Consumer Staples) that perform well in cash‑rich environments.
- Reduce exposure to high‑beta growth stocks that are sensitive to interest‑rate spikes.
SEO focus: trading strategies, Fed minutes analysis, M2 monitoring, bond duration management, sector rotation tips.
Real‑World example: 2024 Quantitative Tightening Surge
- Event: In March 2024, the Fed announced a $300 bn/month QT plan, the fastest since 2018.
- Outcome:
- Cash reserves in the banking system fell by $1.2 tn over six months.
- 30‑day LIBOR rose from 4.75% to 5.20% in Q2 2024.
- S&P 500 experienced a 4% correction, while Treasury bills yielded 5.1% (thier highest in five years).
- Lesson: Large‑scale cash withdrawals can trigger rapid asset re‑pricing-a pattern that a 2025 cash‑only coup could replicate on a larger scale.
Keywords: 2024 QT surge, cash reserve decline, LIBOR spike, Treasury bill yields, market correction.
Key Indicators to Watch in Real Time
| Indicator | What It Signals | Monitoring tool |
|---|---|---|
| Fed Funds effective Rate | Immediate impact of liquidity changes | FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) |
| M2 Money Supply Growth | Overall cash availability in economy | Bloomberg, FRED |
| Reserve Balances (H.4.1 Release) | direct Fed cash position | Fed H.4.1 PDF |
| Treasury Yield Curve (2Y‑10Y Spread) | Expectations of future rate policy | CME Group, Yahoo Finance |
| VIX Index | Market fear/volatility | CBOE |
