“`html
mum Jailed: TikTok Addiction Fuels £443,000 Fraud
A Mother’s “TikTok addiction” led to a staggering £443,000 fraud, resulting in a 28-month prison sentence. Katherine Greenall’s case highlights the destructive potential of social media obsessions, as her actions not only devastated her employer but also deeply impacted her family.
The Downward Spiral: From Trusted Employee to Fraudster
Katherine Greenall, 29, initially joined New Reg Ltd in St Helens in April 2021 as a customer services manager. By December 2022, She had risen to accounts manager, granting her access to the company’s crucial bank accounts. Her colleagues viewed her as “vital” to the company’s growth, appreciating her organizational skills and trustworthiness. However, this trust was soon betrayed.
Christopher Taylor, the prosecutor, detailed how Greenall manipulated financial reports, diverting funds into her personal accounts. This “significant abuse of trust” allowed her to finance a lifestyle increasingly centered around TikTok.
TikTok Tokens: Fueling the Addiction
Greenall’s spending habits took a drastic turn, with the majority of the stolen funds going towards TikTok tokens. these tokens, gifted to content creators, provided Greenall with “amusement and entertainment,” feeding her growing addiction.
Alongside her TikTok spending,Greenall indulged in holidays,hotel stays,and Amazon purchases,exacerbating her “voyage of fraud and misadventure.” Despite the extravagant spending, authorities found only a few hundred pounds remaining in her account upon her arrest.
Timeline of the fraud
| Month | Amount Stolen | Details | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 (Total) | £57,036 | 53 unauthorized deposits used for supermarket, Amazon, and sports retailers purchases, family holidays and solicitor fees. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| january 2024 | £8,917 | Four deposits to her account. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| February 2024 | £14,916 | Ten deposits to her account. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| March 2024 | £146,288 | 20 Separate payments to her account. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| April 2024 | £196,364.26 | 31 transactions to her account. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| May 1, 2024 | £20,000 | Final deposit before leaving
trump Administration Sanctions International Criminal Court (ICC) Judges Over Actions Against US and IsraelWashington D.C. – The Trump Administration has followed through on its threat to sanction officials of the International Criminal Court (ICC), targeting four judges it accuses of taking “illegitimate and baseless actions” against the United States and its allies. The move intensifies the ongoing conflict between the U.S. and the international judicial body. Secretary Of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions Thursday, issuing a strongly worded statement condemning the ICC’s actions. Sanctions Imposed On International criminal Court OfficialsThe Trump Administration’s sanctions target four specific judges for their involvement in cases concerning U.S. troops and Israeli officials.
These sanctions entail the blocking of any U.S.-based property or assets belonging to the judges. U.S.-based entities are also prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. Did You Know? The international Criminal court, established in 2002, is the first permanent, treaty-based international criminal court, with a mandate to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. International Criminal Court RespondsThe International criminal Court swiftly responded, defending its judges and criticizing the Trump Administration’s decision. The court insists it “deplores” the actions taken by the US. The International Criminal Court (ICC) released a statement saying, “These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 States Parties from all corners of the globe”. The court insists that,”Targeting those working for accountability does nothing to help civilians trapped in conflict. It only emboldens those who believe they can act with impunity.” justifications For The SanctionsThe State Department explained that Bossa and Ibanez Carranza were sanctioned for authorizing an examination into U.S. troops in Afghanistan in 2020.This investigation sought to probe alleged war crimes committed by U.S. forces and CIA members in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Alapini Gansou and Hohler were sanctioned for their involvement in proceedings against Israeli leaders, including the issuance of arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence minister Yoav Gallant.
A History Of ConflictThis is not the first time the U.S. has taken action against ICC officials. Trump previously issued an executive order threatening sanctions against anyone involved in ICC investigations. This order was largely viewed as a response to the ICC’s investigations into actions in Afghanistan and Palestine. In 2019, the Trump Administration denied or revoked visas for International Criminal Court officials involved in investigating U.S. troops. in 2020, sanctions were imposed on then ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda. These actions were later reversed under President Joe Biden. Critics warn that these actions could have long-term consequences for the International Criminal Court. The court relies on its member countries to execute orders, and these threats undermine its authority and ability to pursue justice. The ICC has repeatedly called for an end to such threats. Pro Tip: Stay informed about international law and the role of international courts. Understanding these institutions is crucial in a globalized world. The ICC’s Role in International Justicethe International Criminal Court (ICC) plays a crucial role in the pursuit of international justice.Established by the Rome Statute, it is the first permanent, treaty-based international criminal court with the jurisdiction to prosecute individuals for the international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. The ICC is intended to complement national judicial systems. It can only act when national courts are unwilling or genuinely unable to investigate and prosecute such crimes. As of 2024, 123 states are parties to the Rome Statute and subject to its jurisdiction. Frequently Asked Questions About the International Criminal Court
What’s your take on the U.S. sanctions against International Criminal Court officials? Do these actions help or hinder the pursuit of international justice? Share your thoughts in the comments below. 
Swedish ISIL Member On Trial For Burning Jordanian Pilot AliveStockholm, Sweden – Osama Krayem, A Convicted Swedish Member Of ISIL, Is Currently On Trial In Stockholm, accused Of War Crimes Related To The Gruesome 2015 Killing Of Jordanian Pilot Maaz Al-Kassasbeh. The Pilot Was Captured And Burned Alive In Syria, An Act That Drew International Condemnation. Prosecutor Reena Devgun Stated In District Court On Wednesday That “Osama Krayem, Together And In Agreement With Other Perpetrators Belonging To IS [ISIL], Killed maaz Al-Kassasbeh.” Details Of The Heinous ActThe Prosecution Detailed Krayem’s alleged Involvement. According To Devgun,Krayem,Dressed In Uniform And Armed,Guarded And Led Al-Kassasbeh To A Metal Cage. Al-Kassasbeh Was Then Locked Inside, Where Another Individual Set Him On Fire. The Pilot Had No Means To Defend Himself Or Call For assistance. This Case Is Seen As Unique Since Other ISIL Members Involved Are Presumed Dead,According To Swedish Prosecutor Henrik Olin,As Reported By AFP News Agency. The Trial BeginsOsama Krayem, 32, Remained Calm As the Charges Were Presented. Dressed In A Dark Blue Shirt, With A Thick Beard And Long, Dark Hair, he Sat with His Back To The Journalists And Spectators Observing From Behind A Glass Wall in The High-Security Courtroom. If Convicted, Krayem Could Face A Life Sentence. Prosecutors Highlighted That the 22-Minute Video Of The Killing Shows The Victim Walking Past Several Masked ISIL Fighters, Including Krayem The 26-year-Old Pilot was Then Seen Being locked In The Cage And Praying As He Was Set On Fire. While The Exact Date Of The Murder Remains Undetermined, The Location Has Been Identified Through Inquiry. Defense Disputes Prosecution’s AccountPetra Eklund, Krayem’s Lawyer, Told AFP before The Trial That Her Client Admitted To Being Present At The Scene But Disputes The Prosecution’s Version Of Events. She Stated, “He Denies the Acts For Which He Is Prosecuted.” She Further Explained That krayem Acknowledges Being present During The Incident But Claims He Did Not act In The Manner Described By The Prosecutors. Identification Of Krayem Was Made Possible By A Scar On His Eyebrow, Visible In The Video, Which Was Spotted By Belgian Police. This Led To The Opening Of the Investigation, According To Devgun. Family seeks JusticeThe Pilot’s Father, Safi Al-Kassasbeh, Expressed The Family’s Hope That Krayem Would “Receive the Harshest Penalty According To The Magnitude Of The Crime.” He added, “this Is What We Expect From A Respected And Fair Law.” Krayem Is Already Serving Lengthy Prison Sentences For His Involvement In The Paris And Brussels Attacks In 2015 And 2016, Receiving Sentences Of 30 Years And Life Imprisonment, Respectively. Now, He Faces Additional Charges Of “Serious War Crimes And Terrorist Crimes” For His Alleged Participation In Al-Kassasbeh’s Murder. Background Of The IncidentAl-Kassasbeh’s Killing Caused Widespread Outrage in Jordan, Which Was Part Of The US-Led Coalition Against ISIL Positions In Syria. ISIL Cited Jordan’s Participation As the Reason For killing The Pilot.Jordan Declared A Period Of Mourning Following His Death. On December 24, 2014, A Royal Jordanian Air Force Aircraft Crashed In Syria. Al-Kassasbeh Was Captured The Same Day By ISIL Fighters Near Raqqa. He Was Burned Alive Sometime Before February 3, 2015, When A Gruesome Video of The Act Surfaced. At The time,ISIL Controlled Large Areas of syria And Iraq. They Demanded The Release Of Sajida Al-rishawi, Held By Jordanian Authorities Since 2005, in Exchange For Al-Kassasbeh’s Life. Rishawi was Sentenced To Death for Conspiring To Carry Out Terror Acts After A Triple Bomb Attack On The Radisson SAS Hotel In Amman. The Propaganda Video, Which Also Called For The Killing Of Other Jordanian Pilots, Was Among The Earliest Released By ISIL. krayem Has Been Temporarily Transferred To Sweden For the Trial, Which Is Scheduled To Continue Until June 26. Key Details Of The Trial
The Global Fight Against ISIL: A TimelineThe Emergence Of ISIL Marked A Dark Chapter In Global Security. From Its Rise In The Early 2010s To Its Territorial Losses and Continued Insurgency, The Fight Against This Group Has Been Marked By International Efforts And Regional Conflicts.
Pro Tip: Stay informed about global security issues by following reports from reputable organizations like the UN and the council on Foreign Relations. The Trial Of Osama krayem Highlights The Ongoing Efforts To Bring Those Involved In ISIL’s Atrocities To Justice. Such Cases Show The Importance Of International Cooperation In Addressing Terrorism And Promoting Accountability For War Crimes. Frequently asked Questions About The ISIL trial
What are your thoughts on this trial? Share this article and join the conversation.
given the significant act of terrorism and war crime, what are the key challenges in gathering sufficient evidence to prosecute this individual in Sweden, considering the clandestine nature of ISIL and the passage of time since the murder?
Sweden Tries ISIL Member for Jordanian Pilot’s Burning DeathThe world is watching as Sweden prosecutes an individual linked to ISIL (also known as ISIS or Daesh) for the horrific murder of a Jordanian pilot. This high-profile case, involving alleged war crimes and terrorism, is bringing attention to the fight against extremism, the role of international law, and the pursuit of justice for victims of atrocities.this article delves into the details of the trial, the accusations, and the meaning of this event. The Accused and the allegationsThe individual on trial is accused of participating in, or enabling the murder of Jordanian pilot Muath al-Kasasbeh. The pilot was captured by ISIL in December 2014 and subsequently burned alive in a barbaric act.The charges against the accused center around war crimes and the commission of acts of terror. This case represents a significant step in efforts to bring ISIL members to justice for their crimes, even years after the initial acts. key Accusations Unpacked
The Brutal Murder of Muath al-Kasasbeh: A summaryLieutenant Moaz al-Kasasbeh,a Jordanian pilot,was captured in December 2014 after his F-16 fighter jet crashed over Syria. ISIL terrorists subsequently detained him. In a shocking display of cruelty, ISIL released a video in february 2015 depicting al-Kasasbeh being burned alive. The video sparked global outrage,highlighting the depravity of ISIL and the brutal realities of the Syrian conflict and the broader Syrian civil war. evidence Presented and Trial ProceedingsThe Swedish court proceedings are gathering evidence that seeks to establish the individual’s direct or indirect involvement in the murder. It is indeed crucial to understand the challenges frequently enough associated with compiling evidence in war crimes against terrorists cases, especially due to the clandestine nature of the terrorist group. Key Elements of Evidence:
The court aims to determine the accused’s role in the tragedy and ensure holding the guilty party accountable. real-World Example: The meticulous documentation of evidence by international bodies like the International Criminal Court offers insight into how such cases are expertly handled. the International Dimension and ImpactThis trial is significant beyond the legal proceedings. The case is an example of the international community’s desire to hold terrorists accountable for their actions, and the Swedish court’s actions have broad global implications. This case impacts the fight against terrorism by sending a message that those who commit atrocities must do so with the full knowledge that consequences are certain. International Law Considerations:
Case Study: The ongoing prosecution in other cases involving ISIL, such as the prosecution of individuals from countries in Europe and across the globe for their roles in the Syrian conflict, offers similar insights and lessons. Potential Ramifications and Future ImplicationsThe outcome of this trial will set a precedent for the pursuit of justice in cases involving ISIS members and other war criminals,influencing the strategy of international courts and tribunals. The case further highlights the importance of collective international responsibility in pursuing justice for victims of heinous crimes and underscores the global commitment to fight terrorism.
The Rising Tide of ‘Serial Claimants’: Why Courts Are Cracking Down on Repeat Injury LawsuitsOver $1 million. That’s the estimated amount a single family sought in damages across 26 personal injury claims, before an appeals court recently dismissed their latest case. This isn’t an isolated incident. A growing number of jurisdictions are grappling with what some are calling “serial claimants” – individuals or families repeatedly filing lawsuits, raising questions about the integrity of the legal system and the fairness to genuinely injured parties. This trend signals a potential overhaul in how personal injury claims are assessed, and could dramatically impact insurance premiums and legal strategies for years to come. The Case That Sparked Renewed ScrutinyThe recent case, highlighted by The Journal, involved a family whose members had filed numerous personal injury claims over several years. While the specifics of each claim varied, the sheer volume raised red flags. The appeals court’s decision to dismiss the latest case wasn’t based on the merits of the injury itself, but on the pattern of behavior and concerns about potential fraud. This ruling underscores a shift towards proactively identifying and addressing potentially abusive litigation practices. Why Are We Seeing More ‘Serial Claimants’?Several factors contribute to this emerging trend. Firstly, the perceived ease of filing a personal injury claim, coupled with the potential for significant payouts, can be an incentive. Secondly, the rise of litigation funding – where third parties finance lawsuits in exchange for a share of any settlement – can encourage more frequent claims, even those with questionable merit. Finally, some legal systems may lack robust mechanisms to track and flag repeat claimants, allowing the practice to flourish. The Role of Litigation FundingLitigation funding, while offering access to justice for those who might otherwise be unable to afford it, can also exacerbate the problem of serial claims. Companies providing this funding often have a vested interest in seeing cases proceed, regardless of their strength. This creates a potential conflict of interest and can incentivize claimants to pursue even marginal cases. A 2023 report by the Association of British Insurers highlighted a significant increase in litigation funding, raising concerns about its impact on the insurance market. The Implications for Insurance and Legal CostsThe rise of serial claimants has a direct impact on insurance costs. Insurance companies, facing increasing payouts from potentially fraudulent claims, are forced to raise premiums for everyone. This creates a ripple effect, impacting businesses and individuals alike. Furthermore, the legal system bears the burden of investigating and defending against these claims, diverting resources from legitimate cases. The increased scrutiny and potential for dismissal, as seen in the recent Irish case, are attempts to mitigate these costs. How Courts Are AdaptingCourts are beginning to implement strategies to combat serial claims. These include:
The Future of Personal Injury LitigationThe trend of serial claimants isn’t likely to disappear anytime soon. However, we can expect to see a continued tightening of regulations and increased scrutiny of claims. The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning to detect fraudulent patterns will become more prevalent. Furthermore, there may be a push for greater transparency in litigation funding, requiring funders to disclose their involvement and potential conflicts of interest. The focus will shift towards preventative measures, aiming to deter individuals from repeatedly filing claims with questionable merit. This will likely involve a more proactive approach from insurance companies and legal professionals, focusing on early detection and robust investigation. What are your predictions for the future of personal injury claims and the fight against fraudulent litigation? Share your thoughts in the comments below! Adblock Detected
Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.
|