FAI Faces New Legal Challenge as Former Women’s Manager Alleges Discrimination

Dublin, Ireland – The Football Association of Ireland (FAI) is once again at the center of controversy, as former women’s national team manager Eileen Gleeson has initiated legal proceedings against the organization. The lawsuit, filed earlier this summer, alleges gender discrimination and disparities in treatment compared to the men’s national team program. This development occurs as the FAI navigates a period of financial strain, recently announcing plans to reduce its workforce by as much as 30 percent in an effort to address a substantial €40 million debt.

Who is Eileen Gleeson?

Eileen Gleeson, aged 53, is a veteran of Irish football, boasting a long career as both a player and a coach. Holding a Uefa Pro Licence, she has managed several prominent clubs, including Peamount United, UCD Waves, and Glasgow City. Prior to her managerial role wiht the national team, Gleeson served as an assistant coach under Vera Pauw for two years. In 2023, she was appointed to lead the FAI’s women’s and girls’ football division.

The Path to Managing Ireland

Following a separation with Vera Pauw, Gleeson initially took on the role of interim coach in August 2023.The position was later made permanent in December of the same year. Though, a defeat against Wales in the Euro 2025 qualifying play-offs led to the FAI’s decision not to renew her contract.

A Shift in Roles and the legal Challenge

Despite not having her contract renewed as manager, Gleeson remained employed by the FAI. Her role was later redefined as “head of football strategic insights and planning,” a position she currently holds. The legal action stems from allegations of discrimination, with Gleeson’s legal team citing numerous instances of perceived bias against the women’s team and its players.

Key Allegations in the Lawsuit

The lawsuit details claims that the FAI consistently prioritized the men’s team over the women’s, resulting in underfunding and inadequate resources for the women’s program. Gleeson further alleges she was pressured into accepting the interim manager position, while expressing a desire to continue in her previous role. This was contrasted with the FAI’s handling of John O’Shea’s appointment as interim manager following Stephen Kenny’s departure.

Perhaps most concerning are allegations regarding the safety and security of the women’s team. The claim details incidents, including an attempted physical assault on a player at Dublin Airport and unauthorized video recording of players in a hotel environment. Gleeson asserts the FAI failed to provide adequate security measures comparable to those afforded to the men’s team.

The Financial Disparity at the Core of the Case

A central argument in Gleeson’s case revolves around equal pay. She alleges a breach of the Employment Equality Acts 1998 to 2015,claiming the FAI failed to provide her with compensation equivalent to that of the men’s national team manager,Heimir Hallgrímsson. Gleeson’s annual salary was reported to be approximately €100,000,substantially less than Hallgrímsson’s €650,000.

Position Manager Annual Salary (approx.)
Women’s National team Manager Eileen Gleeson €100,000
Men’s National Team Manager Heimir hallgrímsson €650,000

The Broader Context of Pay Equity in Football

The issue of pay disparity between men’s and women’s football is a global concern. While the English Football Association, for example, pays its Women’s Manager Sarina Wiegman around £400,000 (€460,000) per year, the men’s Manager Thomas Tuchel earns approximately £5 million. These figures underscore the considerable financial gap that frequently enough exists.

What Could a Ruling in Gleeson’s Favor Mean?

Legally, the case hinges on the interpretation of “like work” under the Employment Equality Acts. If the court determines that Gleeson’s role was comparable to that of Hallgrímsson, it could set a precedent for equal pay regardless of revenue generated by each team. A successful outcome for Gleeson could trigger similar claims from other female managers and perhaps impact sporting organizations throughout Ireland and beyond.

Though, the FAI is expected to argue that the revenue generated by the men’s and women’s teams justifies the pay difference. They will likely emphasize the substantial disparity in match-day attendance,broadcast deals,and commercial partnerships. The women’s team drew an average crowd of 18,000 under Gleeson, compared to 40,000 for the men’s team so far in the current cycle.

Are we witnessing a turning point in the fight for equality in Irish football? And what implications might this case have for the future of women’s sports funding and representation?