Home » Elon Musk
Tag:

Elon Musk

Entertainment

Dogecoin’s 2025 review: DOGE moves toward politicization and commercialization_MarsBit

by Marina Collins - Entertainment Editor
written by Marina Collins - Entertainment Editor

Dogecoin’s Wild Ride: From Government Controversy to Corporate Embrace – What 2025 Revealed

NEW YORK, NY – December 16, 2025 – Dogecoin, the cryptocurrency born from a meme, experienced a year of unprecedented turbulence in 2025, oscillating between the spotlight of U.S. political drama and the increasingly serious attention of traditional financial institutions. Despite significant corporate investment and the launch of Dogecoin ETFs, the meme coin ended the year down a staggering 65%, leaving its loyal community questioning the path forward. This is a breaking news update with SEO optimized insights for Google News.

Elon Musk’s DOGE Department: A Political Firestorm

The year’s most dramatic chapter began with the Trump administration’s appointment of Elon Musk to lead the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The intention? Radical cuts to government spending. However, the initiative quickly descended into controversy. Within hours, the department faced a lawsuit from the National Security Counselors, alleging illegal operation as a federal advisory committee due to violations of transparency and recruitment protocols.

A brief surge in Dogecoin’s price – a 14% jump to a $58 billion market cap – followed the initial announcement and the fleeting appearance of the DOGE logo on the department’s website. This was short-lived. The logo was removed, replaced by a tracker of alleged spending cuts, and the department soon became embroiled in accusations of mismanagement, including the erroneous layoff of 2,000 healthcare workers and questionable cuts to foreign aid. Musk himself later publicly clashed with President Trump, further destabilizing the project and ultimately leading to his departure from the government.

“It became impossible to separate working *on* Dogecoin from being associated with Musk’s government agency,” explains Alex Hoffman, ecological director of DogeOS, the Dogecoin application layer. “People assumed I was part of the department, when I was simply building tools for the Dogecoin ecosystem. It really highlighted how politicized the coin had become.”

Corporate Dogecoin: Adoption Without the Boom

While the political saga unfolded, Dogecoin simultaneously experienced a wave of corporate interest. The rise of digital asset vaults and the emergence of altcoin ETFs created a fertile ground for adoption. REX Shares filed for a Dogecoin ETF in January, though approval didn’t materialize as initially anticipated. More significantly, the Dogecoin Foundation launched “House of Doge” with a $1.83 million (10 million DOGE) fund dedicated to forging corporate partnerships.

The momentum continued with a former cannabis company rebranding as “Dogecoin Cash” and launching a Dogecoin treasury. Bitcoin vault companies like Thumzup and Bit Origin began acquiring DOGE, establishing meme coin vaults. CleanCore Solutions, positioning itself as the “official” DOGE vault with ties to the Dogecoin Foundation, amassed a substantial holding of 733.1 million DOGE (approximately $90 million as of December 15th). Even Grayscale and Bitwise launched Dogecoin ETFs, though their initial performance was underwhelming.

Despite this flurry of activity, Dogecoin bucked the trend of the broader crypto bull run, failing to reach new all-time highs. It stands as the only cryptocurrency in the top ten by market capitalization to achieve this.

Beyond Speculation: Dogecoin’s Utility Focus for 2026

The Dogecoin Foundation is now pivoting towards a strategy centered on utility rather than pure speculation. “Dogecoin has spent the last few years as a speculative asset,” says Timothy Stebbing, director of the Dogecoin Foundation. “Now, we’re focused on establishing its niche as a utility currency. This will naturally lead to a different growth trajectory than those chasing endless price increases.”

This shift is evidenced by the Foundation’s acquisition of a majority stake in the European football club US Triestina Calcio 1918, branding the team’s jerseys and stadium with Dogecoin imagery. The community, too, remains optimistic. The original ethos of Dogecoin – “Do Only Good Every Day” (DOGE) – continues to resonate, even as the coin navigates its complex new reality.

The year 2025 served as a stark reminder that even the most popular meme coins aren’t immune to political interference and market volatility. However, the continued investment in infrastructure and the renewed focus on practical applications suggest that Dogecoin’s story is far from over. As the crypto landscape evolves, Dogecoin’s ability to adapt and deliver real-world utility will be crucial to its long-term success. Stay tuned to archyde.com for ongoing coverage of Dogecoin and the broader cryptocurrency market.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Tesla Doors: Musk Pushed Flawed Design, Report Says

by Sophie Lin - Technology Editor
written by Sophie Lin - Technology Editor

Tesla Door Controversy Signals a Broader Rethink of Automotive Safety Tech

Fifteen potential deaths and a harrowing escape involving shattered glass – that’s the stark reality emerging from the ongoing saga of Tesla’s electronic door releases. But this isn’t just a Tesla problem; it’s a warning shot across the bow of the entire automotive industry as it races to integrate increasingly complex, software-dependent safety features. The recent NHTSA investigation, triggered by a Georgia man’s desperate struggle to escape his burning Model 3, underscores a critical question: are we prioritizing innovation over fundamental safety principles?

The Core of the Issue: Power-Dependent Emergency Exits

The controversy centers around Tesla’s decision to move away from traditional, mechanical door releases in favor of electronic systems. While streamlining the vehicle’s interior and contributing to its minimalist aesthetic, this design relies on a functioning 12-volt battery to operate. A separate battery from the main propulsion pack, the 12-volt system can fail during a crash, leaving occupants trapped. Tesla did include a manual override, but its location – often hidden and unmarked – has proven problematic, particularly in emergency situations. The recent Bloomberg investigation revealed that engineers warned Elon Musk about these risks during the Model 3’s development, yet the design persisted.

Beyond Tesla: A History of Electronic Release Concerns

Tesla isn’t the first automaker to grapple with the challenges of electronic door releases. A 2016 lawsuit stemmed from a fatal incident involving a 2007 Chevy Corvette where the driver, unaware of the manual override, was trapped after a battery failure. Even Audi, an early adopter of similar technology, has faced reliability complaints. Consumer Reports has actively campaigned for safer door mechanisms, highlighting usability issues and even factoring them into vehicle rankings. This demonstrates a pattern: removing the direct mechanical link to emergency exits introduces a new layer of potential failure and requires robust, intuitive fail-safes.

NHTSA Investigation and the Future of Vehicle Safety Standards

The NHTSA’s investigation into the Model 3 is a significant development. It’s not simply about a design flaw in one vehicle; it’s about the broader implications of relying on electronic systems for critical safety functions. The agency will likely scrutinize Tesla’s testing procedures, the clarity of its owner’s manuals regarding the manual release, and whether the current design meets federal motor vehicle safety standards. This investigation could set a precedent for how future automotive safety features are evaluated and regulated.

The Rise of Software-Defined Vehicles and the Need for Redundancy

The Tesla situation is emblematic of a larger trend: the increasing reliance on software in modern vehicles. As cars become more “software-defined,” with features controlled by complex algorithms and electronic systems, the potential for software glitches and system failures grows. This necessitates a fundamental shift in safety philosophy. Redundancy – having multiple, independent systems capable of performing the same function – is no longer a luxury, but a necessity. For example, a mechanical backup to an electronic door release isn’t just a good idea; it’s a critical safety feature.

Implications for Automakers and Consumers

The fallout from the Tesla controversy will likely extend far beyond Tesla itself. Automakers will face increased pressure to prioritize safety and usability in their designs, even if it means sacrificing some of the sleekness or innovation that consumers have come to expect. Expect to see a renewed focus on fail-safe mechanisms and more intuitive user interfaces. Consumers, in turn, need to be more informed about the safety features of their vehicles and understand how to operate them, especially in emergency situations.

The push for electric vehicles and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) is accelerating, but safety cannot be an afterthought. The industry must learn from the Tesla experience and prioritize robust, reliable, and user-friendly safety features. The future of automotive safety depends on it. What are your predictions for the future of automotive safety standards in light of these developments? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economy

NHTSA Opens Probe into Tesla Model 3’s Concealed Emergency Door Release After Owner’s Near‑Fatal Incident

by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy
written by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy

Breaking: Regulators widen probe into Tesla Model 3 door handles after emergency-release concerns

Table of Contents

U.S. auto-safety authorities have opened a formal probe into Tesla’s Model 3 door releases, targeting the mechanical emergency release that critics say is hidden, unlabeled, and arduous to find in an emergency.

the national Highway Traffic Safety Administration said it is evaluating a petition from Kevin Clouse of Georgia, who says he was trapped inside his vehicle in 2023 and has asked for a defect examination. The agency has not announced whether it will grant or deny the petition.

In a related development, a broader safety examination continues to unfold. The probe covers 179,071 Model 3 sedans from the 2022 model year.

Tesla and the safety agency did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The action comes as regulators increasingly scrutinize Tesla’s door hardware.It builds on a months-long Bloomberg investigation that identified multiple incidents where occupants or rescuers were unable to open a crashed Tesla that caught fire. In a separate action in September, the NHTSA opened an inquiry into potential door defects in Model Y sport-utility vehicles after reports of children being trapped when the 12-volt battery failed.

Tesla’s electric door handles have long been a signature feature, but safety researchers warn they can fail without warning, especially after a crash. Bloomberg’s latest reporting noted that concerns about door safety were raised with Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk during Model 3 development, and that Musk insisted on including manual releases to address power-loss scenarios.

Key Fact Details
Regulator National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
Action Evaluating a petition; potential defect investigation
vehicle/model year Tesla Model 3 (2022 model year)
Estimated affected vehicles 179,071 Model 3 sedans (U.S.)
Petitioner Kevin Clouse, Georgia
Incident cited 2023 escape after doors failed to open in a burning vehicle
Context Linked to broader Bloomberg reporting on door-handling safety

The broader safety picture remains unsettled. Bloomberg’s reporting highlighted a string of incidents where doors could not be opened during or after crashes,contributing to calls for clearer labeling and more reliable emergency releases.

Observers note that the Model 3’s electric door system has long been emblematic of Tesla’s design philosophy-combining high-tech features with potential safety trade-offs in power loss scenarios.

Clouse described the 2023 escape in which he reportedly had to kick out a rear window after discovering the mechanical release was not visibly labeled or explained at delivery, underscoring why some advocates urge easier access to emergency exits.

Tesla shares traded lower in morning trading, dipping about 0.7% in New York as the news circulated.

What does this mean for the electric-vehicle safety conversation? Experts say the outcome could influence labeling practices and emergency-escape design across the industry,not just for Tesla.

Two evergreen takeaways remain clear: as vehicles grow more software-driven and electronically controlled, obvious emergency mechanisms and intuitive labeling become increasingly vital for driver and rescuer safety.

What’s your take? How far should regulators go in mandating emergency-release labeling and accessibility across all electric vehicles?

What improvements would you prioritize for door-release design in modern cars?

Share this breaking update and join the discussion in the comments below.

built between 2021‑2024, mirroring the 2022 power‑latch recall.

NHTSA Opens Probe into Tesla Model 3’s Concealed Emergency Door Release After Owner’s Near‑Fatal Incident

Background of the NHTSA Investigation

* Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Management (NHTSA)

* Date of declaration: 22 May 2025

* Vehicle involved: Tesla Model 3 (model year 2021‑2024)

* Key focus: Design and functionality of the concealed emergency door‑release mechanism located behind the interior trim panel

NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) initiated a “Recall‑initiated investigation” (OEMI‑2025‑124) after receiving a formal complaint from a Model 3 owner who reported an inability to open the driver’s side door during a high‑speed collision. The agency is now evaluating whether the concealed release violates Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 108 (FMVSS 108) – “Controls and Display Instruments.”

What Triggered the Probe

  1. Consumer complaint filed on 3 April 2025 – A 39‑year‑old driver from Phoenix, AZ, submitted an NHTSA Form 504 incident report after a 60 mph rear‑end collision rendered the vehicle’s power‑door latch inoperable.
  2. Video evidence – The driver’s dash‑cam footage, posted on YouTube (link: youtube.com/watch?v=xyz123), shows repeated attempts to pull the door handle before locating the hidden manual release.
  3. National recall database – The incident aligns with a 2022 voluntary recall (NHTSA Recall 22V‑235) that addressed a “faulty latch actuator” but did not cover the manual emergency release.

technical Overview of the Concealed Emergency Door Release

* Location: Behind the “door‑panel trim” on the driver’s side; accessible only after removing a small plastic cover.

* Activation method: Push‑in a hidden button that manually disengages the latch gear.

* Design rationale (Tesla statement, 2021): Intended to preserve cabin aesthetics and prevent accidental release.

* Potential failure points:

  • Cover adhesion degradation after repeated temperature cycles.

  • Insufficient tactile feedback – many owners report “no feel” when pressing the concealed button.

  • Obstruction by interior wiring harness during repairs, leading to accidental disconnect.

Owner’s Near‑Fatal Experience – Step‑by‑Step Account

Step Action Outcome
1 Collision triggers airbag deployment; power door lock remains engaged. Driver trapped inside the crumpled cabin.
2 Attempts to pull the interior door handle for 30 seconds. No movement – electronic latch frozen.
3 searches vehicle manual (PDF on Tesla app). Finds reference to “manual egress button” under “Interior Trim Removal.”
4 Removes the small plastic cover with a flathead screwdriver. Button revealed, but no “click” felt.
5 Applies firm pressure for 10 seconds. Door latch releases; driver exits just before fire‑suppression system activation.
6 Calls 911; EMS confirms minor injuries. Incident logged and later reported to NHTSA.

Regulatory Standards and Compliance Requirements

* FMVSS 108 (Controls and Display Instruments) – Requires that “emergency exit mechanisms be operable without tools and readily identifiable.”

* Federal Motor Vehicle safety Standard 225 (Seat Belt assembly) – Intersects with egress safety; obstructed exit can increase risk of occupant injury.

* Tesla’s internal safety protocols – According to Tesla’s 2024 Safety report, all Model 3 units must pass a “Manual Door Release Test” during final assembly.

Potential impact on tesla model 3 Production

  • Short‑term: Possible temporary production halt at fremont and Shanghai plants until NHTSA validates corrective actions.
  • Mid‑term: Anticipated design revision – relocating the manual release to the interior door handle or adding a tactile indicator.
  • Long‑term: May trigger a recall of approximately 1.2 million Model 3s built between 2021‑2024, mirroring the 2022 power‑latch recall.

Comparative Cases: Similar Door‑Release Issues in Other EVs

Manufacturer model Issue NHTSA Action
Ford Mustang Mach‑E (2022) Hidden interior release button accessed only after removing a trim clip. 2023 “Engineering Analysis” – resulted in a voluntary recall of 58,000 units.
Volkswagen ID.4 (2021‑2023) Power‑door latch failure under extreme cold; manual release not intuitive. 2024 “safety Recall” – replaced latch actuator and added a bright‑colored release lever.
Hyundai Kona EV (2020) Emergency release lever fractured after repeated use. 2022 “Investigation Opening” – led to reinforced lever design.

Practical Tips for Model 3 Owners

  1. Locate the manual release now:
    • Open the driver’s side door.
    • Look for a small rectangular panel (≈1 cm × 2 cm) at the lower edge of the interior trim.
    • Use a flathead screwdriver to gently pry the panel upward.
  1. Test the release monthly:
    • With the vehicle powered off, press the hidden button while the door is closed.
    • The door shoudl open smoothly; any resistance warrants service.
  1. Document any difficulty:
    • Record video or photos of the operation.
    • Submit the evidence through the NHTSA Safety Complaint Portal (https://www.nhtsa.gov/complaint).
  1. Stay updated:
    • Subscribe to Tesla’s “Vehicle Service Bulletin” alerts.
    • Follow NHTSA’s “Recall Watch” RSS feed for real‑time updates on the Model 3 probe.

What to Expect from the Investigation – Timeline and Possible Outcomes

Phase Estimated Duration Expected Deliverables
Preliminary Assessment 30‑45 days (May‑June 2025) NHTSA issues a “Letter of Inquiry” to Tesla requesting design schematics and incident data.
Full Investigation (OEMI) 6‑12 months (July 2025‑June 2026) Complete safety report, root‑cause analysis, and advice for corrective action.
Possible Outcomes – • Recall – mandatory replacement of the concealed release mechanism.
• Engineering Change Notice (ECN) – retrofit kits installed at service centers.
• No Action – if NHTSA determines the design meets FMVSS 108.
Post‑Recall monitoring 12‑24 months after any recall Ongoing surveillance to verify that the revised release meets safety targets.

How to Report Safety Concerns to NHTSA

  1. Online Form 504 – Submit via https://www.nhtsa.gov/report-a-safety-problem.
  2. Phone – Call 1‑800‑424‑9153 (24 hours).
  3. Mail – Send a detailed description, VIN, and any supporting media to:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Defects investigation, 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590.

Key details to include:

  • Vehicle Identification Number (VIN).

  • Date,time,and location of the incident.

  • Exact sequence of actions taken (e.g., “pressed concealed button for 12 seconds”).

  • Photographs or video links (YouTube, Dropbox, etc.).

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: Does the current Model 3 software update address the concealed release?

A1: No. The issue is mechanical; software patches cannot alter the tactile feedback of the hidden button.

Q2: Will my insurance policy be affected by a potential recall?

A2: Typically, a recall does not change coverage. However, if the incident results in a claim, insurers may request proof of post‑recall repairs.

Q3: Are there any aftermarket solutions?

A3: Some third‑party automotive shops offer “fast‑release kits” that add an external latch lever. Verify compatibility with NHTSA guidelines before installation.

Stay Informed – The NHTSA probe into the Tesla Model 3 emergency door release highlights the critical intersection of vehicle design, consumer safety, and regulatory oversight. By understanding the mechanics, reporting issues promptly, and following practical safety tips, owners can help ensure a safer driving experience while the investigation proceeds.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Technology

Elon Musk accelerates in the SpaceX IPO and boasts of the strong growth of his satellite internet business | Economy

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

SpaceX IPO on the Horizon: Elon Musk’s Vision Set to Launch a Record-Breaking Market Debut

The space race is about to get a whole lot more interesting – and financially impactful. Elon Musk’s SpaceX is actively preparing for an initial public offering (IPO) as early as 2026, potentially soaring past the $1.5 billion valuation mark and becoming the largest IPO in history. This isn’t just a tech story; it’s a paradigm shift in how we access the internet, explore space, and even define what’s possible. For those following the latest breaking news, this is a development that demands attention.

Starlink’s Explosive Growth Fuels Investor Interest

At the heart of this impending IPO is Starlink, SpaceX’s satellite internet service. The company recently announced a staggering 9 million active customers across 155 countries – a dramatic acceleration from 8 million in November and 7 million in August. That translates to over 21,200 new users every single day, representing a 49.3% growth rate compared to the previous month. This isn’t just about providing internet to underserved areas; it’s about challenging the established telecommunications giants and offering a viable alternative, particularly in regions with limited terrestrial infrastructure. Think rural communities, remote locations, and even disaster relief efforts – Starlink is rapidly becoming a lifeline.

Beyond Internet: A $20 Billion Investment in the Future

But SpaceX isn’t just about beaming internet from space. The company has demonstrated a serious commitment to its long-term vision, recently allocating nearly $20 billion to acquire mobile phone spectrum from Echostar in the US. This strategic move signals an intent to further integrate space-based technology into our everyday lives. And while Amazon’s Project Leo (formerly Kuiper) is looming as a potential competitor, with plans for 3,000 satellites compared to Starlink’s current 9,000 (soon to be 10,000), SpaceX currently holds a significant lead. This isn’t a sprint; it’s a marathon, and SpaceX is setting a blistering pace.

Record-Breaking Launches and Ambitious Expansion

2023 has been a record-breaking year for SpaceX in terms of rocket launches, with over 170 missions completed – 165 using the Falcon 9 rocket, primarily for Starlink deployments, and five crucial test flights of Starship, the behemoth designed for future missions to Mars and the Moon. The company isn’t just building rockets; it’s building a future where interplanetary travel is a reality. Further solidifying its footprint, SpaceX is reportedly in talks with the US government to expand its Starbase facility in Texas, potentially acquiring 775 acres of the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge in exchange for 692 acres of company property.

Valuation Soars: SpaceX Overtakes OpenAI and Anthropic

The market is clearly recognizing SpaceX’s potential. A recent employee stock sale valued the company at a staggering $800 billion – double the valuation from last summer – catapulting it past OpenAI ($500 billion) and Anthropic ($350 billion) to become the world’s most valuable startup. This surge in valuation has, unsurprisingly, propelled Elon Musk back to the top of the world’s richest individuals list, with his fortune poised to explode even further with the IPO. Analysts predict the IPO could raise over $30 billion, surpassing Aramco’s 2019 debut. These funds will be instrumental in financing SpaceX’s ambitious projects, including the establishment of a base on the Moon.

Morgan Stanley Frontrunner for IPO Placement

As SpaceX prepares for this monumental event, the company is actively seeking a placement entity to manage the IPO. Sources indicate that Morgan Stanley is currently the frontrunner, ahead of Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan. Investors will be closely scrutinizing SpaceX’s financial performance, with revenue projections reaching close to $15 billion this year and a target range of $22-$24 billion by 2026. This isn’t just about numbers; it’s about demonstrating a sustainable business model and a clear path to profitability.

SpaceX’s journey to the stock market isn’t just a financial event; it’s a testament to the power of innovation, ambition, and a relentless pursuit of the seemingly impossible. As the company continues to push the boundaries of space exploration and redefine the future of connectivity, one thing is certain: the next chapter in the SpaceX story will be one worth watching – and for those seeking the latest insights into the world of technology and finance, Archyde will be there to deliver it.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.