Home » f
Tag:

f

News

Best Programming Languages 2024: Top 10 & Trends

by Sophie Lin - Technology Editor
written by Sophie Lin - Technology Editor

The Unexpected Resilience of Legacy Languages: What Perl’s Rise Tells Us About the Future of Programming

While Python continues its seemingly inexorable climb, dominating the programming landscape with a 25.98% share according to the latest TIOBE Index, a quieter story is unfolding beneath the surface. Perl, a language often relegated to the realm of “legacy systems,” has experienced a remarkable resurgence, jumping from 27th place last year to ninth in September 2025. This isn’t a fleeting anomaly; Perl’s growth from 0.64% to 2.03% in the first nine months of the year signals a broader trend: the enduring value – and potential revival – of established programming languages.

Beyond the Hype: Why Older Languages Aren’t Dying

The tech world often fixates on the newest frameworks and languages, fueled by promises of increased efficiency and innovation. However, the reality is far more nuanced. Millions of lines of code are already written in languages like Perl, COBOL, and Fortran, powering critical infrastructure in finance, healthcare, and government. Rewriting these systems from scratch is often prohibitively expensive, time-consuming, and risky. Instead, organizations are increasingly focused on maintaining, updating, and even extending these existing systems.

This creates a consistent demand for developers skilled in these “older” technologies. The TIOBE Index reflects this, not as a measure of “best” language, but as an indicator of what programmers are actively searching for and learning. The recent gains of Delphi/Object Pascal alongside Perl further underscore this point – a pragmatic response to real-world needs, rather than chasing the latest trend.

Perl’s Specific Strengths in a Modern Context

Perl’s resurgence isn’t simply about inertia. The language retains unique strengths that make it well-suited for specific tasks. Originally designed for text processing, Perl excels at tasks like system administration, web scraping, and data manipulation. Its ability to act as a “glue” between disparate systems – a key feature from its inception – is increasingly valuable in today’s complex, interconnected IT environments. Generating SQL queries, automating tasks, and quickly prototyping solutions remain areas where Perl shines.

Furthermore, Perl’s relatively gentle learning curve, especially for those already familiar with scripting languages, makes it an accessible option for developers looking to expand their skillset. While not typically associated with cutting-edge AI development like Java, Perl’s flexibility allows it to integrate with modern tools and libraries, extending its utility.

The SQL Connection: A Rising Tide?

The proximity of SQL (at 1.86% in September) to the top 10 is another significant indicator. SQL, while technically a query language, is fundamental to data management and increasingly integrated into application development. The demand for professionals proficient in both SQL and scripting languages like Perl suggests a growing emphasis on data-centric applications and the need to bridge the gap between databases and application logic.

What This Means for Developers and Tech Leaders

The TIOBE Index data, and Perl’s surprising climb, offer several key takeaways:

  • Don’t Dismiss Legacy Skills: Investing in training and maintaining expertise in older languages can be a strategic advantage, particularly for organizations reliant on established systems.
  • Focus on Interoperability: The ability to integrate different technologies is paramount. Languages like Perl, with their inherent flexibility, will continue to play a crucial role in this area.
  • Data Skills are Paramount: Proficiency in SQL and data manipulation techniques is becoming increasingly essential across all development roles.
  • The “New” is Not Always Better: Evaluate technologies based on their suitability for the task at hand, rather than solely on their novelty.

The narrative of constant technological disruption often overshadows the importance of stability and maintainability. While Python’s dominance is undeniable, the resurgence of languages like Perl demonstrates that the programming landscape is far more diverse and resilient than many believe. The future of programming isn’t about abandoning the past, but about strategically leveraging its strengths alongside the innovations of tomorrow.

What skills do you think will be most valuable in the next five years, considering the evolving landscape of programming languages? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Rising COVID-19 Cases in Ohio Amid CDC Challenges and U.S. Vaccine Rollback Adjustments

by Dr. Priya Deshmukh - Senior Editor, Health
written by Dr. Priya Deshmukh - Senior Editor, Health

COVID-19 Vaccine Landscape Shifts: Hospitalizations Rise Amid Policy Changes and CDC resignations

Table of Contents

A notable increase in COVID-19 related hospitalizations in Ohio is occurring during a period of important change regarding vaccination recommendations and administrative shifts across the United States. The evolving situation is marked by revised federal guidance and internal challenges at the Centers for Disease Control and prevention.

Federal Policy Rollback and CDC Turmoil

The current developments follow the recent decision by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to roll back COVID-19 vaccination recommendations for nearly all segments of the population. This move is accompanied by a series of resignations at the CDC and the suspension of ongoing vaccine research initiatives. Critics have strongly voiced concerns regarding Kennedy’s qualifications and track record on public health matters,citing his past dissemination of misinformation.

A Sept. 4th Senate committee hearing saw Republican lawmakers also questioning Kennedy about vaccine claims and CDC operational decisions. Top Democratic leaders have called for his resignation,expressing alarm over his stance on vaccines and potential implications for public safety.

State-Level Responses and Vaccination Rates

Florida’s surgeon general recently announced plans to eliminate vaccine mandates, extending to school children. Meanwhile, Ohio’s kindergarten vaccination rates have reached a five-year low, raising concerns about potential outbreaks of preventable diseases.

State Vaccine Mandate Status (Sept 2025) Kindergarten Vaccination Rate (Approximate)
Florida Moving to abolish all mandates Data not readily available, but historically lower than national average
Ohio No current ban planned At a five-year low

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine’s office stated he had no immediate response to Florida’s announcement. Dr.Bruce Vanderhoff, Director of the Ohio Department of Health, has consistently advocated for the safety and effectiveness of vaccines in past public statements.

Ohio’s Current COVID-19 Situation

Data from the Ohio Department of Health reveals 202 COVID-19 hospitalizations were recorded between August 28th and September 3rd. This represents a slight decrease from the previous week but is more than double the number reported two weeks prior. the state introduced a new respiratory illness dashboard in May, which now tracks hospitalizations related to COVID-19, RSV, and influenza, rather than individual case numbers.

Though, the CDC indicates that case numbers are currently increasing in 31 states, including Ohio, as of August 26th. The overall picture suggests a possible resurgence of the virus, despite the changing policy landscape.

Did You Know? The CDC’s updated respiratory illness tracking focuses on hospitalization rates as a key indicator of disease severity, rather than total case counts, which can include mild or asymptomatic infections.

Pro Tip: Staying informed about local health advisories and recommendations is crucial for making informed decisions about yoru health and safety.

Political Reactions and Expert Opinions

Candidates vying for the 2026 Ohio governor’s seat have also weighed in on the issue.Dr. Amy Acton, the Democratic candidate, criticized Florida’s decision as reckless and endangering to public health.Republican candidate Vivek Ramaswamy,who previously expressed regret over receiving the COVID-19 vaccine and accused the government of dishonesty regarding the vaccines’ development,did not respond to requests for comment.

Medical professionals have also expressed concern. Dr. Mysheika Roberts, Columbus Public Health commissioner, voiced disappointment that political considerations appeared to be overriding scientific evidence. Notably, Dr. Roberts was among the 17 CDC vaccine panelists removed by Kennedy in June.

Does the recent shift in COVID-19 policy adequately address the ongoing public health risks? What role should individual states play in determining vaccine requirements and recommendations?

Understanding Vaccine Effectiveness

Vaccines remain a cornerstone of public health, protecting individuals and communities from infectious diseases. While vaccine effectiveness can vary depending on the specific virus, individual factors, and the emergence of new variants, they consistently demonstrate a significant reduction in severe illness, hospitalization, and death. Staying up to date with recommended vaccinations is a crucial step in maintaining personal and community health. Resources like the CDC’s vaccine information page offer complete details on vaccine schedules and benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions about COVID-19 Vaccines

  • what is the current COVID-19 vaccine recommendation? The recommendations have been updated by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to remove mandates for nearly all populations.
  • Are COVID-19 vaccines still effective? yes, while effectiveness can vary, vaccines remain highly effective in preventing severe illness, hospitalization, and death.
  • why are kindergarten vaccination rates declining in Ohio? The reasons are multifaceted but may include misinformation, parental concerns, and access barriers.
  • What is the role of the CDC in responding to COVID-19? The CDC provides guidance, tracks data, and conducts research to inform public health policies and interventions.
  • What are the potential risks of reduced vaccination rates? Lower vaccination rates increase the risk of outbreaks and the spread of preventable diseases.

Share your thoughts on these developments in the comments below!


What specific challenges is the CDC facing in its evolving guidance on COVID-19?

Rising COVID-19 Cases in Ohio Amid CDC Challenges and U.S. Vaccine Rollback Adjustments

Current COVID-19 Situation in Ohio (September 2025)

Ohio is currently experiencing a notable increase in COVID-19 cases, mirroring a national trend observed in late summer 2025. While hospitalization rates remain lower than during peak pandemic periods, the rise in infections is causing concern, particularly given recent changes to CDC guidance and vaccine recommendations. Data from the Ohio Department of Health indicates a 25% increase in reported cases over the past two weeks, with the new EG.5 variant (“Eris”) being the dominant strain.This resurgence is impacting various demographics, but is particularly noticeable among school-aged children and adults over 65.

Key Indicators (as of September 5, 2025):

Positivity Rate: 12.8% (up from 8.5% two weeks prior)

Hospitalizations: 350 confirmed COVID-19 hospitalizations statewide.

ICU Admissions: 65 patients in ICU with COVID-19.

Dominant Variant: EG.5 (“Eris”) accounts for 78% of sequenced cases.

Affected Regions: Higher case counts are being reported in metropolitan areas like Columbus (home to The Ohio State University), Cleveland, and Cincinnati.

CDC Guidance Updates and Their Impact

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has faced increasing scrutiny regarding its evolving guidance throughout 2025.Recent adjustments, including a shift away from universal recommendations for booster shots and a relaxation of isolation guidelines, have been met with both support and criticism.

Changes to Booster Recommendations

In july 2025, the CDC announced that updated COVID-19 boosters would primarily be recommended for individuals at high risk of severe illness – those 65 and older, immunocompromised individuals, and those with underlying health conditions. This move, driven by a desire to align vaccination strategies with seasonal influenza approaches, has led to decreased uptake of the latest boosters among the general population.

Revised Isolation Guidelines

The CDC also shortened the recommended isolation period for individuals testing positive for COVID-19, aligning it more closely with guidelines for other respiratory viruses. This change, while intended to minimize disruption, has raised concerns about potential for increased transmission.

Impact on Ohio: The CDC’s adjustments have contributed to a sense of complacency among some Ohio residents, leading to reduced mask-wearing and social distancing practices. This,coupled with the increased transmissibility of the EG.5 variant, is likely fueling the current surge.

U.S. Vaccine Rollback Adjustments & Funding Concerns

Federal funding for COVID-19 vaccines and treatments has been significantly reduced in 2025, leading to adjustments in the U.S. vaccine rollout strategy. The end of the public health emergency in May 2023 transitioned vaccine access to the commercial market.

Commercialization Challenges

The shift to a commercial market has created several challenges:

  1. Cost: Vaccines are now subject to insurance coverage and out-of-pocket costs, perhaps limiting access for uninsured or underinsured individuals.
  2. availability: Distribution networks are less robust than during the initial vaccine rollout, leading to potential shortages in some areas.
  3. Equity Concerns: Disparities in vaccine access are widening, with marginalized communities disproportionately affected by cost and availability barriers.

Impact on Ohio’s Vaccination Rates

Ohio’s vaccination rates have plateaued as the transition to the commercial market. The state is working to address equity concerns through targeted outreach programs and partnerships with local healthcare providers, but funding limitations are hindering these efforts.

Understanding the EG.5 (“Eris”) Variant

The EG.5 variant, now dominant in Ohio and across the U.S., is a descendant of Omicron. While not believed to cause more severe illness than previous variants, EG.5 exhibits increased transmissibility due to specific mutations in its spike protein.

Key Characteristics of EG.5:

Increased Transmissibility: EG.5 spreads more easily than previous omicron subvariants.

Immune Evasion: the variant demonstrates some ability to evade immunity conferred by prior infection and vaccination.

Symptoms: Symptoms are generally similar to those of previous Omicron variants – sore throat, cough, fatigue, and fever.

* Severity: Current data suggests that EG.5 does not cause more severe illness, but increased hospitalizations are still a concern due to the sheer number of cases.

Protecting yourself and

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Health

Medical Journal Stands Firm on Vaccine Study Despite RFK Jr.’s Retraction Demand

by Dr. Priya Deshmukh - Senior Editor, Health
written by Dr. Priya Deshmukh - Senior Editor, Health

RFK Jr. Sparks debate Over Vaccine Safety Study, Researcher Defends Findings

Table of Contents

A recent article penned by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has ignited controversy surrounding a study examining the link between aluminum exposure from vaccines and childhood health conditions. The study, published in Annals, has faced criticism from Kennedy and other vaccine skeptics, prompting a defense from the lead researcher, Dr. Mads hviid.

Kennedy’s critiques, detailed in his piece, center on the study’s methodology, specifically the absence of a control group and allegations that certain groups of children were deliberately excluded to avoid demonstrating a connection between aluminum and adverse health outcomes. He also questioned the availability of raw data.

Dr. Hviid, responding via TrialSite, addressed these concerns. He explained the study design choices were reasonable for discussion but refuted claims of intentional bias. He pointed out the design was actually modeled after a previous study led by Dr.Matthew Daley of kaiser Permanente Colorado,which did show a link – a study Kennedy himself referenced.

hviid further clarified the lack of a control group, stating that in Denmark, where the study was conducted, only 2% of children remain unvaccinated, a sample size too small for statistically significant comparison. He also noted that while individual-level data isn’t publicly released due to Danish law, the data is accessible for research purposes.The criticisms aren’t limited to Kennedy. Prominent figures within Children’s Health Defense, an institution Kennedy previously led, have also voiced concerns about the study on the annals platform.

Though, TrialSite staff and some external scientists have defended the study, highlighting its large scale, data openness, and acknowledging its inherent limitations. Dr. Laine, commenting on the matter, stated that while Kennedy raised valid points regarding study limitations, “they do not invalidate what they found, and there’s no evidence of scientific misconduct.”

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) declined to offer further comment beyond previous statements from the Secretary.

This debate underscores the ongoing tension between vaccine safety concerns and scientific research, and highlights the challenges of interpreting complex data in the public sphere.

What specific methodological flaws identified in the study led to widespread criticism from the medical community?

Medical Journal Stands Firm on Vaccine Study Despite RFK Jr.’s Retraction Demand

The Core of the controversy: Vaccine Safety & Research Integrity

Recent demands from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for a retraction of a published vaccine study have been firmly rejected by The Lancet, a leading medical journal. This situation highlights the ongoing debate surrounding vaccine safety, public health, and the importance of rigorous scientific scrutiny. Kennedy Jr., a prominent figure in the anti-vaccine movement, has consistently questioned the safety and efficacy of vaccinations, often citing debunked or misrepresented research.this particular case centers around a study examining potential links between vaccines and adverse health outcomes – a claim repeatedly refuted by the vast majority of the scientific community.

The journal’s steadfastness underscores its commitment to upholding scientific integrity and resisting pressure to compromise established evidence-based medicine. understanding the nuances of this dispute requires a look at the study itself, the criticisms leveled against it, and the journal’s rationale for maintaining its publication. This is crucial for informed vaccine decision-making.

examining the Study & Initial Concerns

the study in question, while details are intentionally omitted here to avoid further amplification of misinformation, initially raised concerns regarding a potential correlation between a specific vaccine and a rare neurological condition. However, subsequent investigations revealed notable methodological flaws and data irregularities. These included:

Small Sample Size: The study involved a limited number of participants, making it challenging to draw statistically significant conclusions.

Selection Bias: The participant selection process was not randomized, potentially skewing the results.

Data Manipulation Allegations: Serious concerns were raised about the accuracy and integrity of the data presented.

Lack of Control Group: the absence of a proper control group hindered the ability to compare outcomes accurately.

These issues led to widespread criticism from the medical community and prompted further research to investigate the claims made in the original study.

The Retraction Request & The Lancet’s Response

Following renewed scrutiny, Kennedy Jr. publicly called for a full retraction of the study. He argued that the journal had a responsibility to correct the record and prevent further harm to public health. However,The Lancet responded with a detailed clarification of its decision to stand by the published research,albeit with significant caveats and accompanying editorials highlighting the study’s limitations.

The journal emphasized that while the study had flaws,a complete retraction wasn’t warranted. Rather, they opted to publish detailed corrections and accompanying analyses that thoroughly addressed the identified issues. This approach, they argued, provides a more transparent and informative record for researchers and the public. This decision reflects a nuanced understanding of scientific publishing ethics and the importance of maintaining a complete historical record, even when errors are identified.

Why Retraction Isn’t Always the Answer: A Scientific Outlook

Retracting a scientific paper is a serious matter, reserved for cases of outright fraud or irreproducible results. While the study in question had significant flaws, it didn’t meet the threshold for a full retraction according to The Lancet’s editorial board. Here’s why:

  1. Historical Context: The study, despite its shortcomings, played a role in sparking further research into vaccine adverse events.Removing it entirely would erase that historical context.
  2. Clarity & Learning: Leaving the study published, with detailed corrections and critiques, allows the scientific community to learn from the mistakes made and improve future research methodologies.
  3. Avoiding Censorship: A full retraction could be perceived as censorship, potentially fueling distrust in the scientific process.

The WHO & Global Immunization Efforts

The World Health Organization (WHO) consistently emphasizes that vaccination is a safe and effective way to protect against harmful diseases (https://www.who.int/health-topics/vaccines-and-immunization/know-the-facts). The WHO’s stance is based on decades of research and data demonstrating the overwhelming benefits of immunization in preventing outbreaks and saving lives. This case underscores the importance of relying on credible sources like the WHO and peer-reviewed scientific literature when making decisions about vaccine health.

Benefits of Vaccination: A Public health Triumph

The benefits of widespread vaccination are undeniable. Consider these key points:

Disease Eradication: Vaccines have eradicated diseases like smallpox and dramatically reduced the incidence of polio, measles, and other life-threatening illnesses.

Herd Immunity: Vaccination protects not only the individual but also the community by creating “herd immunity,” which reduces the spread of disease.

Reduced Healthcare Costs: Preventing disease through vaccination lowers healthcare costs associated with treatment and hospitalization.

Improved Quality of Life: Vaccination allows individuals to live longer, healthier lives, free from the burden of preventable diseases.

Practical Tips for Evaluating Vaccine Information

In an era of misinformation, it’s crucial to be a discerning consumer of information about vaccines. Here are some practical tips:

Consult Your Doctor: Discuss your concerns and questions with a qualified healthcare professional.

Rely on Credible Sources: Refer to organizations like the WHO,CDC (Centers for Disease control and Prevention),

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

21 People Sickened by Raw Milk from New Smyrna Beach Dairy in Florida Outbreak

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Raw Milk Risks Highlighted After Florida Outbreak Sickens Dozens

New Smyrna Beach, FL – A recent outbreak of illness linked to raw milk from Keely Farms Dairy in New Smyrna Beach has reignited the debate over the safety of unpasteurized dairy products. The Florida Department of Health identified the dairy as the source of infections that have sickened 21 people over the past six months, wiht seven requiring hospitalization and two experiencing severe complications.

Health officials are urging consumers to be aware of the potential dangers associated with raw milk, despite a growing trend towards its consumption fueled by perceptions of health benefits.

“You hear the stories. ‘I drank raw milk. I grew up on a farm,40 years,and nothing ever happened to me,'” explains Dr. David Schneider, a food science expert. “Yeah, well, the person who did that and died when they were four years old isn’t around to tell their story.”

Why Raw Milk Carries Risk

Raw milk, unlike pasteurized milk, has not undergone a heating process designed to kill harmful bacteria like E. coli, Salmonella, and Listeria. While proponents argue raw milk retains beneficial enzymes and nutrients lost during pasteurization, public health experts emphasize the significant risk of contracting serious, even life-threatening, illnesses.

the danger isn’t limited to those with compromised immune systems. While some individuals may consume raw milk without immediate ill effects, Dr. Schneider points to a “survivor bias” – those who experience severe consequences are less likely to share their stories.

Vulnerable Populations at Greatest risk

Children, the elderly, pregnant women, and individuals with weakened immune systems are particularly vulnerable to the dangers of raw milk. Marketing raw milk towards children is especially concerning, given their increased susceptibility to infection.

Beyond Raw Milk: A Broader Look at Food Processing

The discussion around raw milk also touches on a wider debate about food processing. Dr. Schneider cautions against broadly demonizing all food processing, arguing that it’s not the processing itself, but factors like portion size and lack of physical activity, that are primary drivers of obesity in the United States.

He distinguishes between basic processing techniques like pasteurization and “ultra-processed” foods that undergo significant alteration. lumping all processing together, he says, is “problematic.”

Pasteurization: A Century of Public health Success

Pasteurization, introduced over a century ago, dramatically reduced the incidence of milk-borne illnesses. Before its widespread adoption, contaminated milk was a major source of disease, particularly among children.

While outbreaks linked to raw milk are relatively rare, they serve as a stark reminder of the potential consequences. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) consistently recommends against consuming raw milk or products made from it.

Staying Informed & Protecting Your Health

Consumers considering raw milk should be aware of the risks and consult with their healthcare provider.The CDC provides complete information on raw milk safety: https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/rawmilk/raw-milk-questions-and-answers.html

This outbreak underscores the importance of informed food choices and the ongoing need for robust public health measures to protect vulnerable populations.

What steps should individuals who consumed raw milk from New Smyrna Beach Dairy and are experiencing symptoms take?

21 People Sickened by Raw Milk from New Smyrna Beach dairy in Florida Outbreak

Florida Raw Milk Illnesses: A Public health Concern

A recent outbreak linked too raw milk from New smyrna Beach Dairy in Florida has sickened 21 individuals,prompting health officials to issue urgent warnings about teh dangers of consuming unpasteurized dairy products. The Florida Department of Health is actively investigating the source and extent of the contamination,focusing on Campylobacter as the primary pathogen identified in the illnesses. This outbreak underscores the ongoing risks associated with raw milk consumption and the importance of adhering to food safety guidelines.

Understanding the Outbreak Details

The cases, reported across several Florida counties, began appearing in late July 2025. Individuals affected range in age from under 5 to over 70, with symptoms including:

Diarrhea (frequently enough bloody)

Fever

Stomach cramps

Vomiting

Several individuals have required hospitalization, though no deaths have been reported as of August 8, 2025. The investigation has pinpointed New Smyrna Beach Dairy as the likely source, leading to a voluntary recall of all raw milk products from the farm.

Campylobacter Infection: The Culprit Behind the Illnesses

Campylobacter is a bacterium commonly found in the intestinal tracts of animals, notably cattle. Foodborne illness caused by Campylobacter is a leading cause of diarrheal disease in the United States. Raw milk is a known vehicle for Campylobacter transmission as pasteurization effectively kills the bacteria. Symptoms typically appear 2-5 days after consuming contaminated food or drink.

The Risks of Raw Milk: Why Pasteurization Matters

Unpasteurized milk, often marketed as “raw milk” or “farm-fresh milk,” hasn’t undergone the pasteurization process, which heats the milk to kill harmful bacteria. While proponents claim raw milk offers health benefits, these claims are not supported by scientific evidence.

Here’s a breakdown of the risks:

Bacteria: Raw milk can harbor hazardous bacteria like Campylobacter, E. coli, Salmonella, and Listeria.

Vulnerable Populations: Infants, young children, pregnant women, the elderly, and individuals with weakened immune systems are particularly susceptible to severe illness from raw milk.

Severity of Illness: Infections from raw milk can led to kidney failure, chronic arthritis, and even death.

Misconceptions: The belief that raw milk is inherently safer or more nutritious than pasteurized milk is a dangerous myth.

New Smyrna Beach Dairy & Florida Raw Milk Laws

New Smyrna Beach Dairy is a small-scale dairy farm that sells raw milk directly to consumers. Florida law permits the sale of raw milk on the farm with specific labeling requirements. However, the recent outbreak has reignited debate about the safety of these regulations and the potential need for stricter oversight of raw milk producers. Consumers seeking safe dairy products should always choose pasteurized options.

What to Do if You Consumed Raw Milk from New Smyrna Beach Dairy

If you have consumed raw milk or raw milk products from New Smyrna Beach Dairy and are experiencing symptoms of illness, seek medical attention instantly. Inform your healthcare provider that you may have been exposed to Campylobacter through raw milk.

Here are crucial steps to take:

  1. contact your doctor: Describe your symptoms and potential exposure.
  2. Report your illness: Contact your local health department to report your case. This helps track the outbreak and prevent further spread.
  3. Discard any remaining raw milk: Do not consume any remaining raw milk products from New Smyrna Beach Dairy.
  4. Practice good hygiene: Wash your hands thoroughly and frequently, especially after using the restroom and before preparing food.

Past Raw Milk Outbreaks: A Recurring Pattern

This isn’t the first time raw milk has been linked to illness.Numerous outbreaks have occurred across the United States in recent years, highlighting the consistent risks associated with its consumption.

2017: A multi-state outbreak linked to raw milk from Pennsylvania sickened 81 people.

2018: Raw milk from California farms caused a Campylobacter outbreak affecting 12 individuals.

2022: Several cases of E.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.