New York, NY – October 29, 2025 – The United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly approved a resolution calling for an end to the long-standing United States economic embargo against Cuba on Wednesday. This marks the 33rd time the assembly has issued such a condemnation, highlighting persistent international opposition to the policy.

Resolution Details and Voting Breakdown

the resolution passed with a notable majority, receiving 165 votes in favor, seven against, and twelve abstentions. This year’s vote witnessed a slight shift in alignment, as the United States secured support from argentina, Hungary, North Macedonia, Paraguay, and Ukraine, in addition to Israel, to vote against the resolution. Last year,only the United States and israel opposed the measure,with Moldova abstaining.

Accusations and Cuban Response

The United States, during lobbying efforts preceding the vote, raised concerns regarding alleged mercenary activity by Cuban nationals in support of Russian forces in Ukraine, claiming up to 5,000 cubans might potentially be involved. Cuba swiftly dismissed these accusations as unsubstantiated and announced that legal proceedings are underway concerning any cubans implicated in such activities. Cuban officials maintain their commitment to peaceful resolutions and have openly expressed support for their ally, Russia, while simultaneously advocating for diplomatic talks.

Historical Context and Limitations

The decades-long US embargo, initially imposed during the Cold War, has been a consistent point of contention between the two nations. Despite the annual UN General Assembly resolutions, the embargo’s removal remains within the purview of the US Congress. The assembly first addressed the issue annually starting in 1992, with the exception of 2020 due to disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Statements from Key Representatives

Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez, addressing the assembly, characterized the embargo as a form of “collective punishment” that infringes upon the human rights of all Cubans, nonetheless of social status or economic position. He firmly stated, “Cuba will not surrender.”

United States Ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, described the annual vote as “political theater,” accusing Cuba of portraying itself as a victim while simultaneously identifying as an adversary of the United States. Deputy Ambassador Jeff Bartos further asserted that supporting the resolution allows the Cuban regime to deflect responsibility for its economic challenges and avoid necessary reforms.

Shifting US Policy throughout Administrations

The United States has consistently opposed the UN resolutions since 1992. A notable exception occurred in 2016 under the Obama governance, when the US abstained from the vote amid a period of improved relations with Cuba. Though, the trump administration reversed course, restoring a stricter stance on the embargo and curtailing many of the easing measures implemented by its predecessor. The Biden administration has continued to vote against the resolution, maintaining the embargo policy.

Year Votes in Favor Votes Against Abstentions
2024 187 2 1
2025 165 7 12

Did You Know? The US embargo against Cuba is the longest-running trade embargo imposed by one country on another.

Pro Tip: Understanding the historical context of the embargo – its origins in the Cold War and subsequent political shifts – is crucial to grasping the complexities of US-Cuba relations.

What impact will continued US policy have on cuba’s economic future?

How might changing geopolitical dynamics influence the debate surrounding the embargo?