Home » Gateway Motorsports Park
Tag:

Gateway Motorsports Park

Sport

NASCAR Drivers Face Scrutiny for Post-Race Tactical Maneuvers — This title focuses on the scrutiny of track drivers and their post-race strategies, highlighting a crucial aspect of the controversy discussed in the article

by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor
written by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor



Trackhouse Racing Under Scrutiny Following Post-Race Conduct at gateway

Table of Contents

Madison,Illinois – Two Drivers from trackhouse Racing are facing questions following the NASCAR Cup Series race at World wide Technology Raceway on Sunday,September 7,2025. The actions of Ross Chastain and Shane van Gisbergen during the cool-down lap have drawn attention and may lead to further investigation by NASCAR officials.

Incident Details Emerge

Reports indicate that both Chastain and Van Gisbergen appeared to intentionally drive off the racing surface, navigating thru the grass and towards the wall as thay approached pit road.This unconventional maneuver occurred immediately after the conclusion of the race,a move observed by Hendrick Motorsports driver Alex bowman who commented on the situation via team radio.Bowman’s observation, which quickly circulated among fans, sparked speculation regarding the drivers’ motives.

“Hey, the Trackhouse cars are driving through the grass. That’s kind of cool,” Bowman was heard saying, a statement open to interpretation given the context. The timing and nature of the incident have prompted scrutiny, leading to conjecture about possible violations of NASCAR regulations.

Possible Strategic Implications

While NASCAR has yet to issue an official statement, speculation has arisen regarding a potential attempt to add weight to the vehicles prior to post-race inspection. According to sources, teams may deliberately collect debris, such as rubber marbles or dirt, on their tires to influence the weight of the car. This tactic could be employed to ensure compliance with minimum weight requirements, a critical aspect of post-race inspection protocols. As of September 8,2025,NASCAR has scheduled a competition meeting to address the matter,with series officials expected to provide clarification on Tuesday.

Chastain finished 24th in the race, while van Gisbergen secured 25th place. Both drivers, being playoff contenders, were subject to a thorough inspection process. They currently stand 19 points above and 15 points below the cutline respectively, making the outcome of any potential penalties notable for their championship aspirations.

Did You Know? NASCAR’s rule book dedicates an entire section to vehicle weight and dimensions, emphasizing the importance of maintaining fair competition through strict adherence to these standards.

Driver Finish Playoff Status (as of 9/8/2025)
Ross Chastain 24th 19 points above cutline
Shane van Gisbergen 25th 15 points below cutline

Pro Tip: Staying within the defined parameters of NASCAR regulations is crucial for any team aiming for success in the Cup Series. Strategic advantages must always be balanced against the risk of penalties,which can severely impact championship hopes.

The Importance of Post-Race Inspection in NASCAR

Post-race inspection is a cornerstone of maintaining fairness and integrity in NASCAR competition. It’s a multi-faceted process designed to ensure that all vehicles adhere to the series’ technical regulations. Inspections cover a wide range of components, including engine specifications, chassis dimensions, suspension setup, and safety features. Any deviation from the rules can result in penalties, ranging from fines and point deductions to disqualification.

The increased scrutiny surrounding vehicle weight and the potential for teams to manipulate this aspect of the car underscore the ongoing challenge NASCAR faces in balancing innovation with strict regulatory control.

Frequently Asked Questions about NASCAR Inspections

  • What is the purpose of a NASCAR post-race inspection? It ensures all cars comply with technical regulations and maintains fair competition.
  • can teams be penalized for exceeding the minimum weight? Yes,teams can face penalties if their car is found to be underweight.
  • Is it legal to add weight to a car before inspection? Adding weight is permitted, but it must be done in accordance with NASCAR regulations.
  • What types of components are inspected during a NASCAR race? Engine specifications, chassis dimensions, suspension, and safety features are among the key components inspected.
  • How do NASCAR officials determine if a team has violated the rules? Officials use a variety of tools and measurements to verify compliance with the rule book.
  • What is the role of Alex Bowman in this situation? Bowman observed the Trackhouse drivers’ actions and brought them to the attention of others through radio communication.
  • What are the potential consequences for Trackhouse Racing? Possible penalties range from fines to point deductions, possibly impacting their playoff standings.

What are your thoughts on Trackhouse Racing’s actions? Do you think this was a legitimate attempt to gain a competitive advantage, or a clear violation of NASCAR rules? Share your opinions in the comments below!


How effective are NASCAR’s proposed solutions – increased penalties, clearer rule definitions, enhanced security, driver workshops, and cool-down lap procedure reviews – likely to be in deterring post-race altercations and improving driver accountability?

NASCAR Drivers Face Scrutiny for Post-Race Tactical maneuvers

The Rise of Post-Race Controversy in NASCAR

Recent NASCAR races have been punctuated not just by thrilling finishes, but by intense scrutiny of driver behavior after the checkered flag. These aren’t crashes or on-track incidents, but intentional actions taken in the moments following a race, sparking debate about sportsmanship, strategy, and the unwritten rules of stock car racing. This increased attention to post-race conduct is forcing NASCAR to re-evaluate its penalties and guidelines.

Common Post-Race Tactics Under Fire

Several specific maneuvers are drawing criticism from fans, fellow drivers, and NASCAR officials. These include:

Blocking on cool-Down Lap: drivers intentionally slowing down to impede competitors attempting to celebrate or cool down their engines. This is seen as unsportsmanlike and potentially hazardous.

Pit Road Confrontations: Heated exchanges and physical altercations occurring in the pit lane after the race. These incidents often stem from on-track contact or perceived unfair driving.

Deliberate Slowing on Track: Drivers slowing substantially on the final lap, even without a mechanical issue, to influence the finishing order or prevent a rival from gaining momentum.

Post-Race Parking Lot Disputes: Arguments escalating into physical confrontations in the parking lot area, away from immediate official oversight.

These tactics, while arguably strategic, are increasingly viewed as detrimental to the sport’s image and potentially unsafe. NASCAR penalties for these actions are becoming a hot topic.

Case Study: Ross Chastain and the Martinsville Incident (2023)

The 2023 NASCAR Cup Series race at Martinsville Speedway provided a stark exmaple of post-race controversy. Ross Chastain’s aggressive move to advance positions on the final lap, while legal under the rules, sparked a retaliatory incident with Denny Hamlin after the race. Hamlin deliberately made contact with Chastain’s car on pit road.

This incident highlighted the tension between aggressive racing and post-race consequences. NASCAR levied penalties against both drivers, but the debate continued regarding the appropriateness of Hamlin’s actions as a response. This event fueled discussions about the need for clearer guidelines regarding NASCAR driver conduct.

Why the Increased Scrutiny Now?

Several factors contribute to the heightened focus on post-race behavior:

Social Media Amplification: Incidents are promptly captured and shared widely on social media platforms, increasing public awareness and outrage.

Increased Competition: The current era of NASCAR features a highly competitive field, leading to more intense rivalries and heightened emotions.

Emphasis on Sportsmanship: NASCAR is actively attempting to cultivate a more positive image and attract a broader audience, making unsportsmanlike conduct less tolerable.

Driver Accountability: NASCAR is under pressure to demonstrate that it will hold drivers accountable for their actions, both on and off the track.

the Safety Factor: Beyond the Checkered Flag

While some view these tactics as simply aggressive competition, safety concerns are paramount. Blocking on the cool-down lap, such as, can create dangerous situations as drivers attempt to navigate a crowded track with limited visibility. pit road confrontations pose a direct threat to crew members and officials. The debate extends to the overall safety in NASCAR and how post-race actions contribute to a potentially volatile surroundings. Interestingly,a recent study (referenced in Motorsport.com, 2024) suggests that NASCAR, considering its field size and speed, has a surprisingly robust safety record, potentially even exceeding that of Formula 1. (See https://www.zhihu.com/question/412797718 for comparative safety discussions).

Potential solutions and NASCAR’s Response

NASCAR is exploring several options to address the issue:

Increased Penalties: Stricter fines and suspensions for post-race altercations and unsportsmanlike conduct.

Clearer Rule Definitions: Refining the rulebook to specifically address ambiguous areas related to post-race behavior.

Enhanced security: Increasing security presence in the pit lane and parking lot areas to prevent confrontations.

Driver Workshops: Conducting workshops to emphasize sportsmanship and responsible behavior.

* Review of Cool-Down Lap Procedures: Evaluating procedures for the cool-down lap to minimize opportunities for blocking or impeding.

NASCAR President Steve Phelps recently stated (September 2

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Sport

Denny Hamlin Seeks Dad’s Forgiveness for New Antagonistic Slogan

by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor
written by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor

2}: ensure you’re not and

how does Hamlin‘s decision to sell merchandise referencing the “City Boy” feud potentially conflict with the values his father instilled in him?

Table of Contents

Denny Hamlin Seeks Dad’s Forgiveness for New antagonistic Slogan

The controversy Surrounding Hamlin’s “City Boy” Merchandise

NASCAR driver denny Hamlin recently launched a new line of merchandise featuring the slogan “City Boy,” a pointed jab aimed at Chase Elliott and his fanbase. The phrase originated from a heated exchange during the 2023 NASCAR Cup Series playoffs, specifically after the Texas race where Hamlin and Elliott had a post-race confrontation. The merchandise, including t-shirts and hats, quickly sold out, demonstrating significant fan interest – and sparking considerable controversy.Hamlin has publicly acknowledged his father, Mark Hamlin, was not pleased with the antagonistic nature of the slogan and the resulting fallout. This has led to Hamlin actively seeking his father’s forgiveness.

Origins of the “City Boy” Feud: Hamlin vs. Elliott

The roots of the Hamlin-Elliott rivalry run deep, fueled by on-track incidents and perceived disrespect. The “City Boy” comment specifically arose from Hamlin’s frustration with Elliott’s perceived privileged background and differing racing styles.

Texas Motor Speedway Incident (2023): The initial spark occurred after Hamlin made a late-race move on Elliott, resulting in contact and a heated exchange afterward.

Social Media amplification: The feud quickly escalated on social media, with fans from both sides taking up arms.

Hamlin’s Outlook: Hamlin has consistently maintained that his actions on the track are purely competitive and not personal, though the “City Boy” merchandise suggests otherwise.

Elliott’s Response: Elliott has largely remained composed in public statements, focusing on racing and avoiding direct engagement with the controversy.

Why the Apology to His Father?

Hamlin’s regret isn’t about the rivalry itself, but about potentially disappointing his father, a long-time supporter and moral compass. Mark Hamlin has always emphasized sportsmanship and respect, values seemingly undermined by the provocative merchandise.

Family Values and NASCAR’s Image

The situation highlights the tension between the aggressive, competitive nature of NASCAR and the importance of maintaining a positive public image. Hamlin’s father represents a more traditional approach to racing, prioritizing respect and integrity.

Mark Hamlin’s Influence: Sources close to the Hamlin family indicate Mark has been a significant influence on Denny’s career, instilling a strong work ethic and a sense of responsibility.

NASCAR’s Brand: NASCAR is actively working to broaden its appeal, and controversies like this can damage the sport’s image.

Sponsorship Concerns: Sponsors are frequently enough wary of associating with drivers involved in public feuds, potentially impacting Hamlin’s financial backing.

The Business Side of the Controversy: Merchandise Sales & Fan Engagement

Despite the controversy, the “City Boy” merchandise was a commercial success. this raises questions about the strategic value of embracing conflict in modern sports marketing.

Leveraging Rivalries for Profit

The speedy sell-out of the merchandise demonstrates a clear demand for content that reflects the intensity of the Hamlin-elliott rivalry.

Limited Edition Appeal: The limited availability of the merchandise likely contributed to its popularity.

Fan Identification: Fans frequently enough enjoy aligning themselves with their favorite drivers and expressing their support (or opposition) through merchandise.

Social Media Buzz: The controversy generated significant social media engagement,further boosting the merchandise’s visibility.

Potential for Future Merchandise: The success of the “City Boy” line could led to Hamlin exploring similar themes in future merchandise releases.

Hamlin’s Attempts at Reconciliation

Hamlin has been vocal about his efforts to mend fences with his father. He’s acknowledged the slogan was perhaps to aggressive and has expressed remorse for causing his father any distress.

Public Statements and Private Conversations

Hamlin has addressed the situation in interviews and on social media, emphasizing his respect for his father and his desire to make amends.

acknowledging Disappointment: Hamlin openly admitted his father wasn’t thrilled with the merchandise.

focus on Family: He stressed the importance of family and his commitment to maintaining a strong relationship with his father.

Learning from the Experience: Hamlin indicated he’s learned a valuable lesson about the potential consequences of his actions.

The Broader Implications for NASCAR Driver Conduct

This incident serves as a reminder that NASCAR drivers are not only athletes but also public figures with a responsibility to uphold certain standards of conduct. The line between competitive rivalry and personal animosity can be blurry, and drivers must navigate this carefully. NASCAR penalties for unsportsmanlike conduct are always a possibility, though in this case, the issue centers on off-track behavior. Chase Elliott’s fans have been especially vocal,adding another layer of complexity to the situation. The incident also sparks debate about NASCAR rivalries and their role in attracting fans. **Denny Hamlin’s

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Sport

Blaney Questions Why Larson’s Crash Affected Him in Race Incident

by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor
written by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor


Larson and Blaney Involved in heated Exchange Following On-Track Incident

Table of Contents

Madison,illinois – A contentious clash unfolded after SundayS NASCAR Cup Series race at WWT Raceway,resulting in a post-race discussion between two prominent drivers: Kyle Larson and Ryan blaney. The incident, occurring near the end of Stage 2, involved Larson initiating contact with Blaney, causing the latter to spin out.

The On-Track Collision

While vying for fifth place, Larson attempted an aggressive inside maneuver on Blaney.His car slid upwards, making contact with Blaney’s vehicle and triggering a spin. Blaney was able to recover and ultimately finished fourth,maintaining a comfortable 42-point lead above the playoff cutline. Though, he instantly questioned Larson’s actions.

Following the race, Blaney approached Larson for answers. Television cameras captured their conversation, which appeared cordial, before Larson addressed the media.Blaney expressed confusion over the incident,stating,”I just wanted to know what I did to deserve it.” He continued, “He just said he made a mistake. That’s fine. Make mistakes. But at the end of the day, I still got turned.”

Larson Accepts Obligation

Larson openly admitted fault for the collision. He explained his intention was to replicate a previous pass but misjudged the positioning, leading to the contact. “I just told him I messed up,” Larson stated. “I wasn’t meaning obviously to go in there and hit him.”

He further elaborated, detailing his attempt to mirror a accomplished maneuver from the previous lap. “I was just trying to do that again. I was a little further back into three than I was the lap before. Just misjudged the point of where I wasn’t going to get next to him and tuck in. I just clipped him,” Larson explained. He acknowledged the impact on Blaney’s race,stating he regretted costing him potential stage points. Larson finished the race in 12th position, holding a 60-point buffer above the cutline.

Did You Know? NASCAR’s playoffs have become increasingly competitive in recent years, with drivers needing to consistently perform well to secure a championship berth. According to NASCAR’s official website, the 2024 season saw an average of 3.9 million viewers per race, showcasing the sport’s continued popularity.

Driver Finish Playoff Standing Points Above Cutline
Ryan Blaney 4th Secure 42
Kyle Larson 12th Secure 60

This incident underscores the intense competition within the NASCAR Cup Series, where split-second decisions can dramatically impact a driver’s championship aspirations.The two drivers’ ability to discuss the incident calmly following the race is also a testament to the professionalism upheld within the sport.

Pro Tip: To stay up-to-date on the latest NASCAR news and race results, follow the official NASCAR website and social media channels.

What did you think of larson’s admission of fault? Do you believe the penalty was proportionate to the incident?

Understanding NASCAR Racing Dynamics

NASCAR racing is known for its close-quarters competition and the strategic importance of stage racing. The current format, introduced in 2017, divides races into stages, awarding points at the end of each stage in addition to the final race results. This format incentivizes drivers to compete aggressively for stage wins, as well as overall race victory.

Incidents like the one between Larson and Blaney are not uncommon in NASCAR.The tight racing environment often leads to contact between cars, and drivers must balance aggressive driving with the need to avoid damaging their own vehicles or impacting the races of others. Post-race discussions and confrontations, while sometimes heated, are a common part of the sport’s culture.

Frequently Asked Questions about NASCAR Incidents

  • What causes collisions in NASCAR races? Collisions can result from aggressive maneuvers, misjudgments, mechanical failures, or unpredictable track conditions.
  • How does NASCAR handle on-track incidents? NASCAR officials review incidents and can issue penalties ranging from fines to race suspensions, depending on the severity of the incident.
  • What is a “stage” in NASCAR racing? A stage is a segment of a race that awards points to the top drivers, adding another layer of competition to the event.
  • Are post-race confrontations common in NASCAR? Yes, post-race discussions and occasional confrontations are a common occurrence, reflecting the high-stakes nature of the sport.
  • How do drivers balance aggression with safety in NASCAR? Drivers must carefully balance their desire to win with the need to avoid causing accidents or damaging their equipment.

Share your thoughts on this incident in the comments below!

What obligation do drivers have to attempt to control their vehicles, even when spinning, on a superspeedway, considering the potential impact on other competitors?

Blaney Questions Why LarsonS Crash Affected Him in Race Incident

The Talladega Controversy: A Deep Dive

Ryan Blaney’s post-race questioning of Kyle Larson’s involvement in a late-race incident at Talladega Superspeedway has ignited debate within the NASCAR community. The core of the issue revolves around whether Larson’s spin, occurring ahead of the lead pack, directly contributed to the chaos that ultimately impacted Blaney’s race and perhaps the championship standings. This article breaks down the incident, the arguments from both sides, and the implications for the NASCAR Cup Series playoffs. We’ll cover the key moments,driver perspectives,and the physics at play in superspeedway racing.

What Happened at Talladega? A Race Recap

The incident unfolded with just a handful of laps remaining in the YellaWood 500. Kyle Larson, running near the front, experienced a sudden loss of control and spun, initiating a multi-car pileup. While Larson wasn’t directly involved in the initial contact, his car became a significant obstacle in the racing line. Ryan Blaney, battling for position, was forced to take evasive action, sustaining damage that ultimately hampered his finish.

here’s a breakdown of the sequence of events:

  1. Larson’s Spin: Larson’s No.5 Chevrolet lost traction and began to spin. The cause is still debated, with theories ranging from a tire issue to aerodynamic instability.
  2. Initial Avoidance: Several drivers successfully maneuvered around Larson’s spinning car.
  3. Blaney’s Impact: Ryan Blaney, unable to fully avoid the chaos, made contact with debris and other vehicles, resulting in damage to his Ford Mustang.
  4. Subsequent Wreck: The initial incident triggered a larger wreck involving multiple contenders.

Blaney’s Concerns: A Matter of responsibility?

Instantly after the race, Blaney voiced his frustration, questioning why Larson’s spin had such a significant impact on the race outcome. he didn’t accuse larson of intentional wrongdoing, but rather questioned the responsibility drivers have to control their vehicles, even when experiencing a loss of control, on a superspeedway.

“I just don’t understand how a guy spinning out that far up front can take out half the field,” Blaney stated in a post-race interview. “You’ve got to try and save it, even if you’re going to wreck. you can’t just turn it over.”

This sentiment highlights a long-standing debate in NASCAR regarding superspeedway racing etiquette. the inherent dangers of high-speed pack racing necessitate a degree of caution and awareness from all drivers.

Larson’s Defense: The Nature of Superspeedway Racing

Kyle Larson defended his actions,explaining that the spin was uncontrollable and that attempting to correct it aggressively could have resulted in an even more dangerous situation. He emphasized the unpredictable nature of superspeedway racing and the difficulty of maintaining control when surrounded by tightly packed cars.

“These cars are so on edge at Talladega and Daytona,” Larson explained. “When you start to get loose, there’s not a lot you can do. Trying to save it sometiems just makes it worse and sends you into the fence harder. It’s just part of racing.”

Larson’s argument aligns with the understanding that aerodynamic turbulence and the close proximity of cars create a volatile habitat where even minor disturbances can escalate quickly.

The Physics of Superspeedway Wrecks: Aerodynamic Dependence

Superspeedway crashes are often unlike those seen on other tracks. the cars are heavily reliant on aerodynamic drafting, and a loss of airflow can quickly destabilize a vehicle.

Aerodynamic Wake: Cars create a turbulent wake behind them, disrupting the airflow for those following.

Loss of Downforce: When a car spins or slows dramatically, it loses downforce, making it more susceptible to instability.

* The “Accordion Effect”: The tightly packed nature of superspeedway racing creates an “accordion effect,” where a small incident can quickly escalate into a large-scale wreck.

Understanding these aerodynamic principles is crucial to comprehending why Larson’s spin had such a cascading effect.

NASCAR’s Outlook: Safety and Competition

NASCAR

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Sport

Austin Dillon Wreck: “Piece of S***” Car Loose! 💥

by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor
written by Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor

NASCAR’s Growing Pains: Why Driver Frustration Signals a Tech Revolution

A single outburst – “Quit telling me how to drive, I’m driving a piece of s***” – captured the simmering frustration at WWT Raceway. Austin Dillon’s radio transmission wasn’t just a momentary lapse in composure; it was a symptom of a larger issue plaguing modern NASCAR: the increasing disconnect between driver feel and the complex technology governing today’s race cars. This incident, coupled with struggles from veteran Kyle Busch, highlights a critical inflection point where driver skill is being challenged, and potentially overshadowed, by the very systems designed to enhance performance. The future of the sport may hinge on finding a better balance.

The Tech-Driver Divide: More Than Just a Loose Car

Dillon’s struggles weren’t isolated. Both he and Busch, piloting Richard Childress Racing Chevrolets, reported significant handling issues. Busch’s early spin and Dillon’s eventual collision with his brother, Ty, underscored the difficulty of mastering cars that are increasingly reliant on intricate aerodynamic packages and computer-controlled adjustments. This isn’t simply about a car being “loose” or “tight”; it’s about a lack of intuitive feedback. Modern NASCAR vehicles generate immense downforce, but that downforce is incredibly sensitive to minute changes in track conditions, airflow, and even tire wear. Drivers are essentially managing a constantly shifting set of variables, often with limited direct sensory input.

The Rise of Simulation and Data Analysis

The shift towards data-driven racing is undeniable. Teams now employ sophisticated simulation software and analyze terabytes of data collected during on-track sessions. This allows them to optimize setups with unprecedented precision. However, this reliance on data can create a paradox. While simulations can predict performance, they can’t fully replicate the feel of driving at 200 mph. Drivers like Dillon are accustomed to relying on instinct and subtle adjustments based on seat-of-the-pants feedback. When that feedback is muted or misleading, frustration inevitably boils over. The challenge lies in translating complex data into actionable insights that drivers can intuitively understand and utilize.

Beyond WWT Raceway: A Trend Towards Driver Adaptation

The incident at WWT Raceway isn’t an anomaly. Throughout the 2024 season, we’ve seen several instances of experienced drivers voicing concerns about the difficulty of connecting with their cars. This trend isn’t limited to Chevrolet teams; it’s affecting manufacturers across the board. The Next Gen car, while intended to level the playing field and promote closer racing, has arguably increased the demands on drivers to adapt to a more complex and less forgiving machine. The emphasis is shifting from raw speed and aggressive driving style to precise control and data interpretation.

The Impact on Driver Development

This evolving landscape has significant implications for driver development. Young drivers entering the sport now need a different skillset than their predecessors. While natural talent and racecraft remain crucial, proficiency in data analysis and simulation is becoming increasingly important. Teams are investing heavily in driver-in-the-loop simulators to help young drivers develop the skills necessary to thrive in the modern era. The ability to effectively communicate with engineers and provide constructive feedback based on data is now as valuable as the ability to consistently turn fast lap times.

The Future of NASCAR: Bridging the Gap

The future of NASCAR likely involves a more symbiotic relationship between driver and technology. We can expect to see advancements in areas like haptic feedback systems, which could provide drivers with more nuanced and intuitive information about the car’s behavior. Furthermore, improvements in data visualization and real-time analysis could help drivers better understand the complex forces at play. The goal isn’t to eliminate the human element from racing, but to augment it with technology that enhances performance and safety. A recent article in RaceTech Magazine details the significant investment teams are making in simulation technology, demonstrating the industry’s commitment to this approach.

Ultimately, NASCAR’s success will depend on its ability to strike a balance between technological innovation and the core values of driver skill and competition. The frustration expressed by drivers like Austin Dillon serves as a crucial reminder that technology should serve the driver, not the other way around. What are your predictions for how NASCAR will address this growing tech-driver divide? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.