Is Wrestling Losing Its Grip on Reality? Bret Hart’s Critique Signals a Potential Shift
Nearly 40% of wrestling fans say authenticity is the most important factor in enjoying a match, according to a recent study by the Sports Entertainment Research Council. But what happens when the line between performance and genuine athletic competition blurs too much? Wrestling icon Bret Hart thinks we’re rapidly approaching that point, and his recent criticisms of modern wrestling – calling it “too fake” – are sparking a crucial conversation about the future of the sport.
The “Hitman’s” Lament: A Loss of Fundamentals
Speaking on the Johnny I Pro Show, Hart expressed his frustration with the current wrestling landscape, stating he finds more enjoyment revisiting matches from the 1990s and earlier. He specifically highlighted Stampede Wrestling as a prime example of a style rooted in believable action and solid fundamentals. This isn’t simply nostalgia; Hart believes the emphasis on “workmanship” – the craft of wrestling – is what made the older eras feel authentic. He argues that today’s performers often prioritize spectacular, high-risk maneuvers over the foundational techniques that create the illusion of a real contest.
From Wrestlers to Actors: A Fundamental Shift in Presentation
Hart didn’t mince words, accusing many contemporary wrestlers of being “actors pretending to be wrestlers.” This is a stinging critique, but it points to a core concern: the perceived decline in wrestling skill. He lamented the apparent lack of understanding of even basic techniques like a headlock, claiming the focus has shifted entirely to “high spots” – flashy, often dangerous moves designed for crowd reaction. This emphasis on spectacle, Hart argues, undermines the psychological storytelling and competitive presentation that defined wrestling’s golden ages. The goal, he believes, should be to “pretend that it’s a real sport,” a concept seemingly lost in today’s landscape.
The Legacy of Realism: Ricky Steamboat as a Benchmark
Hart’s critique isn’t simply negative; he offers a clear example of what he values: Ricky “The Dragon” Steamboat. He praised Steamboat’s ability to make every match feel like a legitimate competition through his expressions, mannerisms, and in-ring psychology. Hart consciously strived for that same level of authenticity in his own performances, aiming to create a believable contest rather than a choreographed sequence of moves. This highlights a key element of compelling wrestling: the ability to draw the audience into the narrative and make them believe in the struggle.
The Rise of “Spot-Fest” Wrestling and Its Implications
The trend Hart criticizes – prioritizing high spots over substance – has become increasingly prevalent, often referred to as “spot-fest” wrestling. While these matches can be undeniably exciting, they often lack the narrative depth and believable action that characterized earlier eras. This shift is partly driven by the demands of social media and the need for viral moments. Short-form video platforms reward spectacular moves, incentivizing wrestlers to focus on highlight-reel material rather than building compelling matches. This creates a feedback loop where spectacle is prioritized, potentially at the expense of long-term fan engagement.
Beyond the Ring: How Changing Media Consumption Fuels the Trend
The way fans consume wrestling has dramatically changed. The rise of streaming services and on-demand content means viewers are less likely to invest in long-form storylines and more likely to seek out quick bursts of excitement. This shift in consumption habits has arguably contributed to the emphasis on high spots and immediate gratification. Furthermore, the proliferation of independent wrestling promotions, while offering a platform for diverse talent, has also fostered a culture of experimentation and risk-taking, sometimes at the expense of fundamental technique. WWE’s annual reports show a consistent focus on increasing viewership through “eventful” moments, suggesting a corporate alignment with this trend.
The Future of Wrestling: A Potential Course Correction?
Hart’s critique isn’t just a lament for the past; it’s a potential warning for the future. While spectacle will likely always be a part of wrestling, a complete abandonment of fundamentals and storytelling could ultimately alienate core fans. We may see a resurgence of interest in wrestlers who prioritize in-ring psychology and believable action, offering a counterpoint to the current emphasis on high spots. Alternatively, wrestling could continue down its current path, evolving into a more performance-based art form that prioritizes entertainment over athletic realism. The key will be finding a balance that satisfies both casual viewers seeking thrills and dedicated fans craving authenticity.
What role do you think storytelling and in-ring psychology will play in the future of professional wrestling? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
