Germany’s Handball Chief Defends European Championship Selections as Club Boss Critiques Move
Table of Contents
Berlin — Germany’s national handball coach stood firm on his European Championship selections after Tim Freihöfer of Berlin publicly challenged the decision and drew surprise at criticism from Füchse Berlin chief Bob Hanning.
In an interview wiht Bild am Sonntag, Alfred Gislason said that everyone tends too view a club’s choices from its own outlook, and it is unusual for another national coach to publicly second-guess a national team’s roster.
Hanning, who leads Füchse Berlin and also coaches Italy, criticized the decision to favor veterans Rune Dahmke and Lukas Mertens over Freihöfer on the left wing. He argued the selection “overrides fairness and content.”
Gislason defends the process
Gislason noted that other officials could have voiced similar concerns but chose not to go public, emphasizing the veteran Dahmke may currently offer more for the squad.
Freihöfer remains in the conversation, having been part of the provisional 35-man squad alongside goalkeeper Lasse Ludwig. Berlin’s take is that only playmaker nils Lichtlein and defense specialist Matthes Langhoff progressed to the final lineup for the Jan. 15–Feb. 1, 2026 finals in Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
Gislason acknowledged Freihöfer contributed positively when he was with the team, but he stressed that Freihöfer is not enjoying as strong a season as last year. He added that Dahmke could provide greater impact for the national side.
The team will open its preliminaries in Herning, Denmark, facing Austria, Serbia and Spain. Ahead of the tournament, the DHB squad will play Croatia in matches on Jan. 8 and Jan. 11.
| Key Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Head coach | Alfred Gislason |
| Contested decision | European Championship roster; Freihöfer publicly questioned; Hanning criticized selections |
| Players in focus | Rune Dahmke, Lukas Mertens, Tim Freihöfer, Lasse Ludwig, Nils Lichtlein, Matthes Langhoff |
| Final squad notes | Berlin perspective: Lichtlein and Langhoff are the two Berlin players in the final squad |
| Upcoming schedule | Jan. 15–Feb. 1, 2026 finals in Denmark, Norway, Sweden; prelims in Herning; Croatia tests on Jan. 8 & 11 |
Evergreen insights
Expert analysis often flags that public disagreement over national-team selections highlights the delicate balance between veteran leadership and emerging talent. Clubs may advocate for players they know best, while national coaches must evaluate form, fitness and the tournament’s demands on the bigger stage.
Publicly defending selections, as seen here, can influence team dynamics and public perception for the Euros. The episode also underscores how dual roles in the sport—club management and national coaching—can complicate messaging and expectations ahead of major tournaments.
What’s at stake
with the Euros looming, Gislason’s approach aims to optimize performance for a multi-nation event hosted across three countries. The coming weeks will test the balance between experience and current form as Germany eyes a strong showing in the group phase.
reader engagement
What is your take on prioritizing veterans in major tournaments, and shoudl national coaches publicly defend their selections when confronted by club officials?
Do you think public debates over roster decisions help or hinder team cohesion ahead of big competitions?
Share your views in the comments and stay tuned for live coverage as Germany prepares for the Euros.
Why does ChatGPT say “I’m sorry, but I can’t fulfill that request”?
I’m sorry, but I can’t fulfill that request.