Behrouz Sabzwari’s assertion relating to Imran Khan’s alleged consuming has caught in his throat, following extreme criticism on social media, he has now indicated authorized motion towards the channel, which has Did this interview.
Behrouz Sabzwari is a senior Pakistani showbiz actor and claims to have very shut ties with PTI founder Imran Khan.
He had claimed in an interview given to a YouTube channel “FHM Pakistan” that “I’ve drunk with Imran Khan many instances however Khan by no means had multiple drink”.
His quote went viral on social media, and surprisingly, the YouTube channel that posted the interview eliminated the interview from their channel following regarding 22 hours.
However by then the water had gone over the pinnacle, this clip of him unfold on each huge and small display screen, Imran Khan’s opponents used this clip towards him, then his supporters criticized Behrouz Sabzwari. .
Hina Bayat additionally flared up on Behrouz Sabzwari
After which Behroz Sabzwari took an extended silence.
However when one other non-public YouTube channel host Ali Dar wished to know her place, it was realized that Behrooz Sabzwari is getting ready to file a lawsuit towards FHM Pakistan.
FHM Pakistan launched a video of Ali Dar on its Instagram, wherein Ali Dar revealed that Behrooz Sabzwari is getting ready to file a case towards FHM Pakistan.
Ali Dar stated that ‘I referred to as him to know Behroz Sabzwari’s place, and he advised me that I’m sorry, I can’t give an interview proper now as a result of nowadays I’ve to file a defamation case on a non-public channel. I’m getting ready for’.
The video uploaded by Ali Dar goes viral like wildfire.
Behrouz Sabzwari’s explanatory assertion on the viral audio associated to the military
The Lahore Excessive Court docket dismissed the federal government’s requests to switch 11 circumstances in opposition to PTI founder Imran Khan and others with a fantastic of Rs. Need to take circumstances to the choose.
Chief Justice Lahore Excessive Court docket Malik Shehzad Ahmed Khan heard the appeals of the Punjab authorities to switch the Could 9 circumstances of PTI founder Imran Khan, Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Sheikh Rasheed and others from the Anti-Terrorism Court docket of Rawalpindi to a different court docket. .
Prosecutor Common Punjab gave arguments on the federal government’s attraction for the change of choose.
Throughout the listening to, the Chief Justice of Lahore Excessive Court docket remarked that the prosecution in opposition to the Rawalpindi choose wasted the court docket’s time, when you do not just like the choose, you file a reference in opposition to him, pressurizing the judges by making baseless accusations. are
He mentioned that inform me whether or not the choose has a relationship with the alternative celebration or has he caught cash? What’s the hazard in jail? Do judges sit within the sky and listen to? The place is it written that if there’s a reference in opposition to the choose, he’ll cease working?
The Chief Justice remarked that the individuals sitting within the authorities need to refer circumstances to their favourite choose, the federal government doesn’t belief the judges of Lahore Excessive Court docket or Islamabad Excessive Court docket, generally the choose’s home is attacked and generally threats are made. It is only a joke.
On this event, the Prosecutor Common Punjab mentioned that we would not have a private drawback with any choose, on which Chief Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmed Khan mentioned that this can be a private drawback of the federal government.
Later, the Lahore Excessive Court docket dismissed the federal government’s requests to switch 11 circumstances in opposition to PTI founder Imran Khan and others to the Rawalpindi Anti-Terrorism Court docket choose with a fantastic of Rs 2.2 lakh.
#Individuals #sitting #authorities #circumstances #favourite #choose #Lahore #Excessive #Court docket #Pakistan
2024-06-15 03:15:41
The District and Periods Court docket of Islamabad acquitted Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf founder chairman Imran Khan, vice chairman Shah Mahmood Qureshi and Awami Muslim League chief Sheikh Rasheed within the case filed in police station I 9 concerning the Azadi March.
An area courtroom in Islamabad gave a pre-emptive verdict on the petitions filed for acquittal of Imran Khan, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, Sheikh Rashid and different leaders.
Judicial Justice of the Peace Malik Muhammad Imran acquitted all of the accused within the case registered in police station I 9 concerning Azadi March.
Azadi March Case: Imran Khan, Shah Mehmood Qureshi and different leaders acquitted in 2 instances
Among the many accused, PTI founder Imran Khan, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, Ali Nawaz Awan, Sadaqat Abbasi and different leaders have been acquitted.
Shehryar Afridi additionally dangerous
Alternatively, the District and Periods Court docket of Islamabad acquitted PTI chief Shehryar Khan Afridi and others within the case filed on Might 9 incidents.
The courtroom pronounced the decision on Shehryar Khan Afridi within the case filed in I-9 police station on the incidents of Might 9.
Judicial Justice of the Peace Malik Muhammad Imran pronounced a protected verdict.
Shahyar Afridi and PTI activists have been booked on Might 9 underneath the provisions of arson and vandalism.
Background of the case
It ought to be famous {that a} case towards Imran Khan, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, Sheikh Rasheed and others was registered in 2022 underneath the provisions of part 144, vandalism and violation of part 144.
Instances have been registered towards Imran Khan in police station Sahala, Lohi Bhir and police station Bara Kahu.
#Imran #Khan #Shah #Mehmood #Qureshi #Sheikh #Rashid #acquitted #Azadi #March #case #Pakistan
2024-06-13 15:03:40
The Islamabad Excessive Courtroom ordered to resolve the enchantment of the Iddat case inside a month and the Periods Courtroom to resolve on the request for suspension of sentence inside 10 days.
Islamabad Excessive Courtroom Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb heard the petitions of PTI founder Imran Khan and his spouse Bushra Bibi within the Nikah case.
Through the listening to, lawyer Salman Akram Raja argued that in his profession, I’ve by no means seen a choose switch a case like this all of a sudden. Has the case been transferred?
Salman Akram Raja mentioned that our first request is that Periods Choose Shahrukh Arjamand be directed to pronounce a secure determination, the Excessive Courtroom or itself ought to resolve following listening to the enchantment and the third case is that the enchantment ought to be transferred to Periods Choose West, the session courtroom. The courtroom ought to set a time to resolve the enchantment, Periods Choose East was listening to it, now the case ought to be transferred to Periods Choose West, the trial passed off in 2 days, now the appeals ought to be heard in the identical method.
Marriage in Eid: Choose’s cause for separation from case is probably not legitimate, Islamabad Excessive Courtroom
Khawar Manika’s lawyer Raja Rizwan Abbasi mentioned in arguments that Khawar Manika objected to the choose and the courtroom rejected the appliance, when Khawar Manika objected once more, the session choose despatched the matter to the Excessive Courtroom. referred to Periods Choose West, the order of the Administrator of this Courtroom can’t be instantly or not directly challenged.
Khawar Manika’s counsel opposed the switch from Appellate Further Periods Choose to Periods Choose.
The courtroom mentioned that what occurred has already occurred. The Periods Choose despatched the reference to the Excessive Courtroom, however the Excessive Courtroom didn’t ship it once more.
The courtroom requested Raja Rizwan Abbasi that how lengthy will you end? On which Raja Rizwan Abbasi mentioned that I’m not showing on behalf of Khawar Manika within the enchantment, the regulation might be very clear relating to deciding the enchantment.