Economy

BTC, USDT, USDC lead global capital flows: Chainalysis

by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy September 7, 2025

written by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy

<h1>India and the United States Now Dominate Global Cryptocurrency Adoption</h1>

<p><strong>New York, NY – June 27, 2025</strong> – In a stunning shift in the cryptocurrency landscape, India and the United States are leading the charge in global adoption, according to the newly released Geography of Cryptocurrency Report 2025 by Chainalysis. This isn’t just about tech enthusiasts anymore; both retail investors and institutional players are fueling unprecedented growth, signaling a maturing market and a potential turning point for digital assets. This is <strong>breaking news</strong> for anyone following the future of finance, and a significant win for <strong>SEO</strong> visibility in the crypto space.</p>

<h2>India Takes the Crown in Overall Crypto Adoption</h2>

<p>The report reveals that India has secured the top spot in *every* measured sub-category of crypto adoption, from individual retail participation to large-scale institutional capital flows. This remarkable surge is a testament to the country’s growing digital infrastructure and increasing financial inclusion. It’s a fascinating story of a nation embracing a new financial frontier, and one that’s rapidly changing the global crypto map.  For those tracking <strong>Google News</strong> trends, this is a story to watch.</p>

<h2>US Gains Ground with ETF Approvals</h2>

<p>The United States has moved into second place, propelled by a significant increase in institutional participation following the approval of Spot-Bitcoin-Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). This move legitimized Bitcoin in the eyes of many traditional investors, unlocking billions in new capital.  Pakistan, Vietnam, and Brazil round out the top five countries driving crypto adoption, showcasing a diverse global interest.</p>

<h2>Asia-Pacific: The Fastest-Growing Crypto Market</h2>

<p>The Asia-Pacific region is experiencing explosive growth, with on-chain transaction volume soaring by 69% to $2.36 trillion this year. India, Pakistan, and Vietnam are at the forefront of this expansion, demonstrating the region’s appetite for digital currencies. Latin America isn’t far behind, with a 63% growth rate, while Sub-Saharan Africa is seeing a 52% increase, largely driven by cross-border transfers and everyday payments.  While North America and Europe remain dominant with $2.2 trillion and $2.6 trillion received respectively, the growth trajectory is clearly shifting eastward.</p>

<h2>Stablecoins: The Backbone of Global Transactions</h2>

<p>Stablecoins continue to be essential for widespread crypto adoption, facilitating trillions of dollars in monthly transactions. USDT and USDC remain the dominant players, but newer stablecoins are making waves. Circle’s euro-backed EURC, launched under the European MiCA regime, has seen a nearly 90% monthly growth rate, reaching $7.5 billion by June 2025. PayPal’s PYUSD has also experienced substantial growth, jumping from $783 million to $3.95 billion. Even payment giants like Visa and Mastercard are entering the stablecoin arena, signaling a broader acceptance of this technology.</p>

<h2>Bitcoin Remains the Primary On-Ramp to Crypto</h2>

<p>Despite the proliferation of altcoins, Bitcoin continues to be the preferred entry point for fiat-to-crypto conversions, attracting a staggering $4.6 trillion between July 2024 and June 2025 – more than double the next largest category (Layer 1 tokens excluding BTC and ETH). The United States remains the world’s largest fiat on-ramp, processing four times the volume of South Korea.</p>

<h2>Crypto Adoption Spans All Income Levels</h2>

<p>Interestingly, Chainalysis found that crypto adoption is widespread across all income levels – high, medium, and low. While lower-income countries are still more vulnerable to market volatility, the increasing accessibility of crypto is empowering individuals globally. This democratization of finance is a key driver of the long-term growth potential of the industry.</p>

<p>The rapid rise of crypto adoption in India and the US isn’t just a fleeting trend; it’s a fundamental shift in how people are thinking about and interacting with money.  As institutional investment continues to grow and new technologies like stablecoins mature, we can expect to see even more widespread adoption in the years to come.  Stay tuned to archyde.com for the latest insights and analysis on the evolving world of cryptocurrency and decentralized finance.</p>

September 7, 2025 0 comments

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Economy

“I don’t like black skin” The wife of an Indian husband who burned his wife … death sentence sentence

by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy September 5, 2025

written by Daniel Foster - Senior Editor, Economy

India: Husband Sentenced to Death for Brutal Murder Driven by Colorism

Udaipur, India – In a landmark ruling that’s sending shockwaves through India and sparking renewed debate about pervasive colorism, a man named Kishanas has been sentenced to death for the horrific murder of his wife, Lakshmi. The case, originating in Udaipur, Rajasthan, exposes the dark underbelly of societal biases and the devastating consequences of discrimination based on skin tone. This is a breaking news story with significant implications for SEO and Google News visibility.

A Year of Marriage, A Lifetime of Abuse

The couple, married for just one year, endured a tragically short union marred by Kishanas’s relentless verbal abuse. According to reports from the BBC and Financial News, Lakshmi repeatedly told doctors and police, before succumbing to her injuries, that her husband frequently demeaned her, calling her “Kali” – a derogatory term referencing her darker skin. In 2017, Kishanas doused Lakshmi in a flammable liquid and set her ablaze.

The District Court of Udaipur delivered the death sentence on August 30th, calling Kishanas’s actions “too cruel,” noting he even continued to pour liquid on Lakshmi while she was already burning. Prosecutor Dineshi Paliwal hailed the verdict as “historical,” emphasizing the importance of protecting women and daughters from such brutality.

The Deep Roots of Colorism in India

Lakshmi’s story isn’t an isolated incident. Colorism – prejudice or discrimination against individuals with a dark skin tone – is deeply ingrained in Indian society. Historically, lighter skin has been associated with higher social status, stemming from colonial influences and a preference for Aryan features. This bias manifests in various forms, from marriage prospects to employment opportunities.

“For generations, Indian society has unfortunately placed a premium on fair skin,” explains Dr. Anjali Sharma, a sociologist specializing in gender studies at the University of Delhi. “This preference is perpetuated through media, advertising, and even within families. It creates a system where women with darker skin face systemic disadvantages and are often subjected to ridicule and abuse.”

The case echoes past tragedies, including instances where women have been killed by their husbands due to their skin color, highlighting the urgent need for societal change. The legal system’s response in Kishanas’s case is a significant step, but lasting change requires addressing the underlying cultural biases.

Beyond the Headlines: Addressing Systemic Bias

While the death sentence provides a measure of justice for Lakshmi, the broader issue of colorism demands a multifaceted approach. This includes:

• Education: Implementing educational programs that challenge harmful stereotypes and promote inclusivity.
• Media Representation: Encouraging diverse representation in media and advertising to dismantle the association between fair skin and beauty.
• Legal Reform: Strengthening laws and enforcement mechanisms to protect women from domestic violence and discrimination.
• Community Dialogue: Fostering open conversations within communities to address and dismantle ingrained biases.

Kishanas’s defense lawyer argued the death was accidental, a claim the court vehemently rejected. The severity of the crime, coupled with the motive rooted in prejudice, solidified the court’s decision. This case serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of unchecked bias and the critical need for a more equitable and inclusive society.

The sentencing of Kishanas marks a pivotal moment in the fight against colorism in India. It’s a somber victory for Lakshmi, and a powerful call to action for a nation grappling with deeply rooted societal prejudices. Stay tuned to Archyde for continued coverage of this developing story and in-depth analysis of the issues surrounding gender equality and social justice.

September 5, 2025 0 comments

0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

News

Peter Navarro Criticizes India for Fueling Russia’s War Efforts and Impacting U.S. Jobs

by James Carter Senior News Editor September 5, 2025

written by James Carter Senior News Editor

September 5, 2025

Navarro Accuses India of Fueling Russia‘s war Effort, Raising Trade Concerns

Table of Contents

• 1. Navarro Accuses India of Fueling Russia’s war Effort, Raising Trade Concerns
• 2. Escalating Criticism from Washington
• 3. India’s Response and US Internal Debate
• 4. The Broader Implications
• 5. Understanding Geopolitical Energy Dynamics
• 6. Frequently Asked Questions About India and the Russia-Ukraine conflict
• 7. How does Peter Navarro argue India’s oil trade with Russia impacts U.S. job markets?
• 8. Peter Navarro Criticizes India for Fueling Russia’s War Efforts and Impacting U.S. Jobs
• 9. Navarro’s Core Argument: Circumventing Sanctions
• 10. The Economic impact on U.S. Jobs – Navarro’s Claims
• 11. India’s Position and Justification
• 12. U.S. Response and Diplomatic Pressure
• 13. The G7 Price Cap and its Effectiveness
• 14. The broader Geopolitical Implications
• 15. Relevant Keywords & Search Terms

New Delhi – A senior White house advisor has reignited a diplomatic dispute, directly accusing India of benefiting financially from its continued purchase of Russian oil and contributing to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.The accusations, leveled by Peter Navarro, are also centering on alleged negative impacts on American employment due to India’s trade practices.

Escalating Criticism from Washington

On Friday, Peter Navarro utilized social media to articulate his concerns, stating that India’s significant tariffs result in job losses within the United States.He further contended that India’s acquisition of Russian oil directly supports the Russian war machine,resulting in casualties and increased financial burdens for American taxpayers. Navarro’s statements followed a recent article in the Washington Post detailing the strain in relations between the U.S. and India, as reported by ANI.

Navarro has consistently voiced criticism of India’s trade relationship with Moscow, characterizing the conflict as “Modi’s war.” He’s publicly labeled India as a “Kremlin’s laundromat,” alleging the nation is capitalizing on the situation.Last week, during an interview with Bloomberg Television, navarro asserted that India is actively aiding Russia’s military operations, linking the path to peace to actions taken in New Delhi.

India’s Response and US Internal Debate

The Indian Ministry of External Affairs swiftly rejected Navarro’s assertions, deeming them “inaccurate and misleading.” Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal affirmed India’s commitment to its established agenda with the United States and expressed hope for continued collaboration based on mutual respect and shared interests.

Meanwhile, White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett indicated that President Donald Trump and his team were “disappointed” with India’s ongoing imports of Russian crude oil. Though, Hassett also expressed optimism for potential positive shifts in the future.Trump himself has frequently characterized India as America’s “most tariffed partner,” labeling the trade dynamic as “totally one-sided.” A recent ruling by a U.S. appeals court deemed some of Trump’s tariff measures as “illegal.”

Issue	Navarro’s Claim	US Government Position	India’s Response
Russian Oil Imports	Profiteering, fueling war	Disappointment, hope for change	Rejection of claims
Trade Tariffs	Costing US jobs	Concern, legal challenges to tariffs	No direct comment

Did You Know? India’s oil imports from russia have substantially increased since the start of the Ukraine conflict, offering India a cheaper alternative to conventional oil suppliers.

Pro Tip: understanding the geopolitical implications of energy trade is crucial for investors and policymakers alike.

The Broader Implications

this escalating rhetoric comes at a sensitive time for U.S.-India relations. Both nations have been strengthening ties in areas such as defense and technology. However, disagreements over trade and India’s stance on the Russia-ukraine war pose challenges to further cooperation. The situation highlights the complex balancing act India faces in navigating its strategic partnerships.

What impact will these disputes have on the future of US-India relations? And how will India’s energy policy evolve in the coming months?

Understanding Geopolitical Energy Dynamics

Global energy markets are notoriously complex. Countries often prioritize energy security and affordability, leading to diverse sourcing strategies, even when these conflict with geopolitical considerations. The Ukraine war has dramatically reshaped these dynamics, forcing nations to reassess their energy dependencies and explore alternative suppliers. india, as a rapidly growing economy with significant energy demands, is particularly vulnerable to price fluctuations and supply disruptions.

The ongoing trade tensions between the U.S.and India reflect broader trends in global trade, including the rise of protectionism and the increasing importance of strategic autonomy. As the world becomes more multipolar,countries are less willing to align themselves exclusively with any single power,leading to a more fragmented and competitive international landscape.

Frequently Asked Questions About India and the Russia-Ukraine conflict

• What is India’s primary reason for importing Russian oil? India cites energy security and affordability as key drivers for its continued purchase of Russian crude oil.
• How has the US responded to India’s oil imports from Russia? The US has expressed disappointment and concern, suggesting it fuels Russia’s war effort, but has not imposed sanctions on India.
• What are the key trade disputes between the US and India? Disagreements center on India’s high tariffs on US goods, which the US argues create an unfair trade imbalance.
• What is the significance of Peter Navarro’s criticisms? Navarro’s statements represent a hawkish view within the US management and signal potential for increased pressure on India.
• What is India’s official position on the Russia-Ukraine conflict? India has maintained a neutral stance, calling for a peaceful resolution and abstaining from votes condemning Russia at the UN.
• What is the current state of US-India relations? Despite trade disputes, the US and India are strengthening cooperation in other areas, such as defense and technology.

Share this article and let us know your thoughts in the comments below!

How does Peter Navarro argue India’s oil trade with Russia impacts U.S. job markets?

Peter Navarro Criticizes India for Fueling Russia’s War Efforts and Impacting U.S. Jobs

Navarro’s Core Argument: Circumventing Sanctions

Peter Navarro, former trade advisor to president Trump, has publicly and repeatedly criticized India’s continued trade with Russia, specifically focusing on its purchase of discounted Russian oil. His central argument revolves around the assertion that India is effectively circumventing Western sanctions imposed on Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. This circumvention,Navarro contends,directly funds Russia’s war machine and undermines international efforts to pressure Moscow. The core of his critique centers on the idea that India’s actions are strategically benefiting Russia while concurrently harming U.S. economic interests and national security.

The Economic impact on U.S. Jobs – Navarro’s Claims

Navarro’s concerns extend beyond simply enabling Russia’s war. He argues that India’s reliance on cheaper Russian oil creates an uneven playing field, impacting U.S. energy markets and, consequently, American jobs.

Here’s a breakdown of his key points:

Reduced Demand for U.S. Energy Exports: increased Indian purchases of Russian oil diminish the potential demand for U.S. energy exports, particularly liquefied natural gas (LNG).

Price Suppression: The influx of discounted Russian oil into the global market puts downward pressure on oil prices,potentially hurting U.S.oil producers.

Job Losses in the Energy Sector: Lower oil prices and reduced export opportunities could lead to job losses in the U.S. energy sector, from extraction and refining to transportation and related industries.

Impact on Manufacturing: Higher energy costs for U.S. manufacturers are avoided by India,giving them a competitive advantage.

Navarro has specifically pointed to potential job losses in states like Texas, Pennsylvania, and Louisiana, which are heavily reliant on the energy industry. He frequently cites data on U.S. energy exports and employment figures to support his claims.

India’s Position and Justification

India defends its continued trade with Russia by citing its energy security needs and the necessity of securing affordable energy sources for its rapidly growing economy. Key arguments include:

Energy Security: India, a nation of 1.4 billion people, has a significant and growing energy demand. Securing reliable and affordable energy supplies is a top priority.

Discounted Prices: Russian oil is offered at a considerable discount compared to oil from other sources, allowing India to save billions of dollars.

Non-Alignment Policy: India maintains a long-standing policy of non-alignment and strategic autonomy, refusing to be drawn into geopolitical conflicts.

Limited Option sources: Promptly replacing Russian oil with alternative sources would be challenging and potentially disruptive to the Indian economy.

India has also emphasized that it is adhering to all international sanctions and is not directly funding the war effort. they argue that purchasing oil is a legitimate commercial transaction.

U.S. Response and Diplomatic Pressure

The U.S.government has expressed its concerns to India regarding its trade with Russia,urging New Delhi to reduce its reliance on Russian energy. However, the U.S. has largely avoided imposing secondary sanctions on India, recognizing its strategic importance and its role in the Indo-Pacific region.

Diplomatic efforts have focused on:

Dialog and Engagement: Regular discussions between U.S. and Indian officials to address concerns and explore potential solutions.

Alternative Energy Partnerships: Promoting cooperation on renewable energy and other alternative energy sources to reduce India’s dependence on fossil fuels.

Highlighting the Risks: Emphasizing the potential risks associated with continued trade with Russia, including reputational damage and potential future sanctions.

Navarro’s Critique: Navarro argues the price cap is largely ineffective, as countries like India are still able to purchase Russian oil at prices above the cap through various mechanisms, including blending and shipping routes.

G7 Defense: Supporters of the price cap maintain that it has had a significant impact on Russia’s oil revenue, forcing Moscow to offer deeper discounts and limiting its ability to finance the war.

Shadow Fleet: The emergence of a “shadow fleet” of tankers, often owned and operated by companies outside of G7 control, has facilitated the continued transport of Russian oil, circumventing the price cap.

The broader Geopolitical Implications

The situation highlights the complex geopolitical dynamics at play in the Russia-Ukraine war. India’s position reflects a broader trend of some countries in the Global South prioritizing their own economic interests over strict adherence to Western sanctions. This raises questions about the effectiveness of sanctions as a tool of foreign policy and the potential for a more multipolar world order. The U.S. is navigating a delicate balance between maintaining its relationship with India and pressing it to align more closely with Western efforts to isolate Russia.

Relevant Keywords & Search Terms

Peter Navarro

India russia Oil Trade

Russia Ukraine War